I have had one before. Sadly we lost our baby girl to a terminal diagnosis in the second trimester in 2012. I opted for this after a NT scan that showed many markers for a chromosomal abnormality. We were completely blindsided because everything seemed to be progressing perfectly up until that appointment. Going forward I would only do the CVS if we found markers from our NT scan that indicates that we should get more information. The CVS does far more than just test for trisomy 21. Our daughter didn't have any of the trisomies that they typically test for in the blood tests offered by week 10 so it wouldn't have come up then though this pregnancy I will do the blood test just for some peace of mind given my history.
The procedure itself was obviously very emotional given the situation but physical pain wise it just felt like pressure. They do it of course via ultrasound so they don't harm the baby. Like any procedure it comes with risks but we were able to conclude our baby girl's diagnosis. They essentially take DNA from the placenta and we received the results a week or two after.
Thank you. I don't mean to scare anyone at all. Please understand that the chances of this happening are very rare but I did want to share my experience in case it can help someone considering it.
I have not had one before, but I have had some experience with the other tests that can lead up to such a test. With my first pregnancy, we did the NT scan and got some inconclusive, but worrying news (Zoë was a mover and a shaker, and made things difficult in the tech) and were sent to a specialist. The wanted to do amnio but do to the position of the placenta and a few other factors, it was extremely risky (especially since they were sort of unsure) so we chose to do a blood test know as Verfi. They took some of my blood, and from that, isolated some of Zoë's chromosomes. The test came back showing she had trisomy 13. Generally speaking, Verfi is a newer test and used to help prove amnio. But after an US at 17 weeks, it was pretty obvious that she was not well, and that the blood test was accurate. The details are pretty sad and gruesome so I'll leave that out. We chose to terminate after that, to spare her a life of pain.
The reason I am telling my story is because there are other options, not that the CVS test isn't reliable
Edit: spelling, 'cause apparently, I can't tell the difference between are and our @-)
My sister was told there was a 90% chance my niece had down syndrome, she worried for weeks. Nothing was wrong. I have no risk factors, I won't be doing the testing. It also wouldn't change anything for me to know that.
This is an odd question because most people don't go straight to a CVS. With DS I did the NT screen and the quad screen and got questionable results. Based on that, I made an appt for a CVS, but the MFM who did my u/s at that appointment recommended against it. It was his opinion that my questionable numbers weren't questionable enough to justify the CVS, especially when combined with a good u/s result. So I didn't do it (baby was fine). This time around, the early genetic screening is more readily available (Maternity21, Harmony, etc) so I plan to do that.
I didn't answer the poll because I don't plan to get a CVS, but I do plan on genetic testing, and if early tests reveal a need for a CVS, then I'll get one.
Also, I'm sure this will come up a zillion times in the next few months, but it's not true that a diagnosis "wouldn't change anything." It might change where you deliver. It might change how you prepare. It might change what services you need in the first few months and beyond. It most certainly would change something.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I don't really understand why it would be worrying to have CVS besides waiting for the results and the inherent risks of the test. If the CVS test obtains tissue, you will know almost 100% if the baby has downs, tri13, tri18 or other chromosomal abnormalities. It's not like you do CVS and they tell you it's 75% likely for a chromosomal abnormality, it's all or none. After the results come back, you would either stop worrying (about chromosomal problems) if the test was normal or then decide what to do if the baby does in fact have a chromosomal issue.
Tests that give you fetal cells give you yes or no answers and aren't the same as tests like the triple/quad screen or the nuchal translucency U/S that gives you a percent risk.
I'll be above 35 at deliver, so will get maternit21 testing included which is a non-invasive test that looks at the babies DNA. CVS has a slightly higher rate of miscarriage than amnio so I personally would wait. If there are concerns with the maternit21 results I would get a amnio for confirmation before making any final decisions.
Also, I'm sure this will come up a zillion times in the next few months, but it's not true that a diagnosis "wouldn't change anything." It might change where you deliver. It might change how you prepare. It might change what services you need in the first few months and beyond. It most certainly would change something.
Thank you for saying this. This is so true and having been through it I can definitely say it changes everything and always will.
This is an odd question because most people don't go straight to a CVS. With DS I did the NT screen and the quad screen and got questionable results. Based on that, I made an appt for a CVS, but the MFM who did my u/s at that appointment recommended against it. It was his opinion that my questionable numbers weren't questionable enough to justify the CVS, especially when combined with a good u/s result. So I didn't do it (baby was fine). This time around, the early genetic screening is more readily available (Maternity21, Harmony, etc) so I plan to do that.
I didn't answer the poll because I don't plan to get a CVS, but I do plan on genetic testing, and if early tests reveal a need for a CVS, then I'll get one.
Also, I'm sure this will come up a zillion times in the next few months, but it's not true that a diagnosis "wouldn't change anything." It might change where you deliver. It might change how you prepare. It might change what services you need in the first few months and beyond. It most certainly would change something.
All of this. We did the NT scan with my first pregnancy and numbers were low risk, so no additional screening needed. Last time we did the Panorama genetic blood test (similar to MaterniT). Again, low risk results so nothing more needed.
I absolutely think that information is power. I don't think the people getting these tests are doing so because they would choose to terminate a pregnancy based on the results. It's so that they know what is going on in their pregnancy and can plan whatever may be needed to handle things. If something were to happen, wouldn't you want to be as prepared as possible?
BFP #1- 4/2011; DD Brynn born 12/2011
BFP #2- 7/13; EDD- 4/2/14; Lost DS at 20 weeks (11/16/13) due to cord accident
BFP #3- 3/14; EDD- 11/28/14; Lost DD at 15 weeks (6/7/14)- cause unknown
To my angels- I held you every second of your lives and I'll love you every second of mine.
My friend did it and it was a positive test (baby would have DS) the baby came out completely normal and healthy....I am not putting myself through that kind of worry if it is not 100%
I have been wondering the same thing...get the test done or not. It's a hard decision.I'm not sure if I want to worry my entire pregnancy or deal with whatever issues may arise once my sweet baby is born.
Ps I'm pretty sure tarynleann meant it wouldn't change her decision on whether she would terminate the pregnancy... I
I agree with @babyknutson. If the test isn't a 100% guarantee then I don't want it to affect the next 6 months of what should be one of the happiest times of our lives. There's enough to worry about as a FTM and PGAL.
I'm having a NT scan and maternal serum screening later on this month. If that comes back saying I'm high risk for abnormalities, I suppose SO and I will have a long discussion with our doctor and make our decision then.
I'm having a NT scan and maternal serum screening later on this month. If that comes back saying I'm high risk for abnormalities, I suppose SO and I will have a long discussion with our doctor and make our decision then.
This - if my NT scan comes back at at high risk, then I'll do the CVS scan. Last time, my NT scan came back with a very low risk so I chose not to have a CVS.
Re: Who is getting a CVS test - testing for down syndrome
The procedure itself was obviously very emotional given the situation but physical pain wise it just felt like pressure. They do it of course via ultrasound so they don't harm the baby. Like any procedure it comes with risks but we were able to conclude our baby girl's diagnosis. They essentially take DNA from the placenta and we received the results a week or two after.
The reason I am telling my story is because there are other options, not that the CVS test isn't reliable
Edit: spelling, 'cause apparently, I can't tell the difference between are and our @-)
I didn't answer the poll because I don't plan to get a CVS, but I do plan on genetic testing, and if early tests reveal a need for a CVS, then I'll get one.
Also, I'm sure this will come up a zillion times in the next few months, but it's not true that a diagnosis "wouldn't change anything." It might change where you deliver. It might change how you prepare. It might change what services you need in the first few months and beyond. It most certainly would change something.
We're having the nt scan at 12 weeks and harmony test same day. Having a daughter with special needs and knowing what I know, I want to be prepared!
All of this. We did the NT scan with my first pregnancy and numbers were low risk, so no additional screening needed. Last time we did the Panorama genetic blood test (similar to MaterniT). Again, low risk results so nothing more needed.
I absolutely think that information is power. I don't think the people getting these tests are doing so because they would choose to terminate a pregnancy based on the results. It's so that they know what is going on in their pregnancy and can plan whatever may be needed to handle things. If something were to happen, wouldn't you want to be as prepared as possible?
BFP #1- 4/2011; DD Brynn born 12/2011
BFP #2- 7/13; EDD- 4/2/14; Lost DS at 20 weeks (11/16/13) due to cord accident
BFP #3- 3/14; EDD- 11/28/14; Lost DD at 15 weeks (6/7/14)- cause unknown
To my angels- I held you every second of your lives and I'll love you every second of mine.
My friend did it and it was a positive test (baby would have DS) the baby came out completely normal and healthy....I am not putting myself through that kind of worry if it is not 100%
[URL=http://media.photobucket.com/user/matrevir/media/Gifs/0021qfqr.gif.html][IMG]http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e236/matrevir/Gifs/0021qfqr.gif[/IMG][/URL]
.
Amalia Anne Knutson 11-6-14
This - if my NT scan comes back at at high risk, then I'll do the CVS scan. Last time, my NT scan came back with a very low risk so I chose not to have a CVS.