Anyone else considering cord blood stem cell banking? I have a cousin who do it with their kids and he ended up needing it after he was diagnosed with Leukemia. Between the stem cells, chemo and surgery he is in remission now for 6 months. It's just hard to swallow the initial cost!
Re: Stem Cells
When you use your own stem cells the chance of reoccurance is really high because you are introducing cells that already know what they are doing with your body. If you put them in someone else they have to restart themselves.
My BFF was saved off donated cells.
me: 37 unexplained infertility, DH 37 normal
ttc for 18 months before seeing RE
Letrozol on CD 3-7, overdril trigger
IUI#1, 2 follicles 17.4 and 20mm BFN
Letrozol and TI cycle BFN
IUI#2 2 follicles (RE noted fluid in uterus, and then realized it was there last time too) BFN
Letrozol and TI BFN
IUI#3 one follicle 21mm (fluid there again) BFP!!!
02/10 beta#1 335 (at 4weeks1day), 02/12 Beta#2 751 :-)
n Chart</a>"http://www.fertilityfriend.com" style="font-size:smaller;" >Ovulation Charww.fertilityfriend.com" style="font-size:smaller;" >Ovulation Chart</a>
https://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/there-was-a-lot-of-talk-yester/
Edited for spelling.
ETA: I do think cord blood donation is awesome, though, so it's great if it's something you want to do!
We did the same thing with our daughter and will do it again with this one.
The cord and placenta are the baby's oxygen source, so as soon as the cord is clamped, baby MUST be breathing in order to receive oxygen. Allowing the cord to remain intact while baby is initially observed protects his oxygen supply.
Delayed cord clamping supplies lots of blood and iron to babies, making their levels higher and reducing the risk of jaundice and anemia.
There are other benefits too. Google it.
Ditto what Emerald27 said. I can't remember the percentage off the top of my head, but we also learned in our birthing class that a large amount of baby's blood lis still in the cord and placenta when the baby is delivered. Not clamping the cord right away allows that blood to be pumped back into the baby, and it only takes a couple minutes for the cord to stop pulsing, I believe. I agree, you should google it!
https://www.cancercenter.com/leukemia/stem-cell-transplantation/
Married 8/27/2011
BFP #1 9/28/2011 DS born 5/22/2012
BFP #2 4/24/2013 m/c 4/25/2013 at 4w
BFP #3 1/31/2014 DD born 10/14/2014
BFP #4 1/20/2016 m/c 2/12/2014 at 7w2d
BFP #5 8/19/2016 DS2 born 4/29/2017
BFP #6 3/7/2018 EDD 11/18/2018
30 dx with PCOS 2010 treating with metformin
DS1 12-29-11 DS2 11-4-14
BFP 10/19/13 missed mc at 5 weeks d&c 11/18/13
BFP 2/16/14 Please stick baby! ! EDD 10/31/14
DX with septate uterus 3/1/14
October 2014 April Siggy Challenge: Favorite Flower - Lilacs
Ditto what Emerald27 said. I can't remember the percentage off the top of my head, but we also learned in our birthing class that a large amount of baby's blood lis still in the cord and placenta when the baby is delivered. Not clamping the cord right away allows that blood to be pumped back into the baby, and it only takes a couple minutes for the cord to stop pulsing, I believe. I agree, you should google it!
*** end quote****
We also did delayed cord clamping with our son. The doctor actually came into the room and said "after the baby is born we'll wait until the cord stops pulsing to cut it". Which was great, because I'd totally forgotten that I wanted that to happen. There is some research out there that says it may slightly increase the risk of jaundice after birth, but I think most babies are jaundiced anyway after birth and as long as they're closely monitored it's not a big deal.
We seriously considered banking the cord blood but the likelihood of a member of our family benefiting from it combined with the cost made us decide against it.
Edited because quoting is hard.
It's only necessary to cut the cord right away when life-saving measures away from mom are required immediately.