OK, school me ladies. A FB friend, who is annoyingly chronicling every detail of her workout regime/weight loss online, mentioned that she works out first thing in the morning because she burns more fat on an empty stomach. True or an old wive's tale? I always just approached eating/exercising from the standpoint of creating a calorie deficit to lose weight. I didn't think about whether it mattered if I exercised morning, noon or night.
Re: Exercising on an empty stomach
I thought I read somewhere that's it's worse to exercise on an empty stomach when it comes to building muscle and strength. So I don't know for sure about calories.
Not to mention, I have worked out in the morning before eating anything and I'm just more tired when I'm running. I would rather have more stamina then try to burn a few more calories by being hungry.
But, I'm not an expert...
Big Kid Jan 2010
Littlest Man Sept 2012
Jillian Michaels doesn't agree. She says calories are calories, but I always preferred to work out in the morning and then wait 30 minutes to have a shake (because if you get your heart rate to the right zone your body will keep buring calories after you're done).
Those two books are great resources for how your body burns calories and how to get it to burn calories more efficiently after your workout.
I'm in the 'do what makes you feel more comfortable' camp. If you get off your ass and get some exercise, ya dun good. Even if it could "technically" make a difference, you're talking about what.... burning 335 calories during your workout versus 326? Burning an extra 10 'fat reserve' calories? Cool, in 2 years worth of every other day workouts you will have lost an extra pound of fat. It's just a moot point for me. It's like spending two hours shopping around to save $1 on a $200 purchase, or cleaning out my car trunk to save 1/75th of a gallon per mile.
People always say to stay in the 'fat burning zone' because it is most efficient (60:40 ratio of fat to carb calorie burning). At a higher heart rate, the body only burns at a 50:50 ratio. So the fat burning heart rate is most efficient. BUT, in a 30 minute workout, you'll burn 300 cals in the fat burning zone (180 fat and 120 carb), and 400 at the higher rate (200 fat and 200 carb). You burned more actual fat calories at the level above the fat burning zone even though ratio indicates a loss of fat burning efficiency.
So, I'd argue that while it might be the most efficient fat calorie burning practice, it might not result in the maximum amount of fat calories burned in a workout "x" minutes long.