Myself, DD1 and DD2 all have colds this week. I'm pretty sure it's just a cold anyway. Scratchy throat, stuffy/runny nose. Nobody has a fever and everyone is eating, sleeping, playing pretty normally. LO is maybe slightly more fussy and slightly less hungry, but she's also cutting 2 top teeth and I think that's a major contributing factor.
So here's what I am wondering....
I'm trying to decide if I should take LO (or DD1 or myself) to the doctor?
We would not normally go to the doctor for a cold, but I've never had a baby LO with a cold before, DD1 didn't get sick for the first time until she was 17 months. Do you normally take LO in for a cold?
Also, of note, tomorrow is our last day of medical insurance until March 1st, due to my job change. I'm worried that if I take her in for a cold, which she will most likely get over within a week or so on her own, that I'll expose her to the flu (tho she has had her shot), or something worse, landing us back in the doctor when we don't have insurance anyway.
So, what do you ladies think, should I take her in?
TIA
Re: Should I take her to the doctor?
But watch her if she has a fever, is acting lethargic, won't eat or drink for more than a day, and is crying even after you have given Tylenol. Then I would go in.
Your right about going in and catching another germ that's usually what happens to me too. So unless its bad I don't go in.
We have had one ear infection so far this winter, and major eye drainage was what brought us in for that one.
I think I will give the office a call and just see what their thoughts are- though I imagine they'll want to err on the side of caution and have me bring her in. Ugh- this is a tough decision!
I'll find out what a sick visit costs too- it might not be that bad. We did look into Cobra, and we have 60 days to apply and it becomes retroactive to the first date we didn't have insurance. It's $1,000 bucks for 1 month, unfortunately.