I tried the search function, but it's awful and not helpful at all.
One of the doctors in my practice brought this up at my last appointment. This baby has been measuring exactly on time throughout the pregnancy, but the fundal height measurement at my 37w appointment was 3cm over (40w). She ordered an ultrasound, which I'll have on Tuesday. If baby is looking huge, we'll discuss a 39w-induction.
Some other factors:
- a u/s at 33w had LO at 6lb1oz already
- DS1 came on his own at 37w1day, so we're thinking I won't make it to 39w anyways
- DS1 weighed 8lb5oz 3w early, so I do make big babies ... However, his birth was uncomplicated and easy, even
- part of me is concerned that there's something else going on that would cause such a huge jump in measurement. I also understand FH measurements can differ from dr to dr, so maybe this is all a moot point
I really don't want an induction, and I know it's my call in the end. I've heard that induced labors are more difficult and lead to a c/s more often than natural labors.
Just curious others' feelings towards this viewpoint.
Re: Discuss: induction due to "big baby"
In your shoes, I would want to know how much additional risk comes with the baby being larger. My sister delivered a healthy 10lb 8oz baby vaginally at 41 weeks without complications. I'd say if it's possible to wait, then waiting is what I would want to do. Even though I'm so dang uncomfortable. right now :P
ETA numbers are hard
My personal concern would be 'how quick will they jump to c/s?' If you don't want a c/s & they're saying your only other option is to induce, then perhaps that's a route you'd prefer.
There are lots of induction techniques too besides just hooking you up to Pitocin. It might be helpful to research those & discuss with your doctor what you would be comfortable trying if you decide to give induction a try.
It's really just up to you and your doctor. I had successful experiences with induction (DS1 was induced, DS2 was not a scheduled induction but required Pitocin, and DS3 will be induced), but not everyone does.
Induction is usually a more painful labour as you don't build up the natural pain relief and its a forced process. It can also take 3-5 days to get to actual labour, which is why a c-section is more common with induction as Mum's too tired to push by that point!
Hope some of that's useful.....personally I'm going for the old wives tales a couple of days before my induction in the hope things kick off naturally and I get less pain!
I am small/average framed - read small pelvis/birth canal (yeah, yeah, 'because small'... it's relevant when it comes to fetal macrosomia.) and gave birth to a 9 pounder after measuring four weeks behind in fundal height.
With this one I'm measuring four weeks ahead, have had a large fetus in multiple ultrasounds and I'm projected to have around a 10 pounder. .. we'll see. ..
My doctor said that because I did okay birthing my first vaginally there would be no need for a late growth ultrasound or induction with this one.
June/July 2011 - IVF #1 - Transfer cancelled due to OHSS
23 perfect embryos. All 23 made it to freezing!
September/October - FET #1 - October 12th - 2 Grade A embies
October 20th - BFP??! EDD - July 1, 2012
Beta #1 = 154, Beta #2 = 352 Beta #3 = 3,800
U/S #2 - November 14th = 133 bpm! U/S #3 & 4 - November 30th and December 7th = 163 bpm! U/S#5 - January 30th - TEAM PINK!!!
Baby Sweets born on her due date!
That said, I agree with PP that it's your body/baby and if your doctor recommends something it's between you and him.
June/July 2011 - IVF #1 - Transfer cancelled due to OHSS
23 perfect embryos. All 23 made it to freezing!
September/October - FET #1 - October 12th - 2 Grade A embies
October 20th - BFP??! EDD - July 1, 2012
Beta #1 = 154, Beta #2 = 352 Beta #3 = 3,800
U/S #2 - November 14th = 133 bpm! U/S #3 & 4 - November 30th and December 7th = 163 bpm! U/S#5 - January 30th - TEAM PINK!!!
Baby Sweets born on her due date!