Parenting

Harry Potter ?'s (MAJOR nerd alert)

littlestjerrylittlestjerry member
edited January 2014 in Parenting
Ok, I've been re-reading all the HP's because I hadn't read them in years. But I have some questions that Google isn't really helping me answer. Spoiler alert, in case anyone cares.

1. I'm really confused by the ending of Prisoner of Azkaban and the time turner thing. Like, how did Harry see himself save himself from the dementor? And did Buckbeak ever get executed the first time around or no? Because I thought they couldn't change events in time per Dumbledore (because of the consequences), and I'm confused about how they could see things happen the first go around that hadn't happened yet. I feel like I can't articulate my question, but, whatever, that part confuses me.

2. At the end of Goblet of Fire, Voldemort is going around the circle of Death Eaters and talks about the missing ones. He talks about how he has one faithful servant still at Hogwarts and that turns out to be Barty Crouch. But what about Snape? He still thinks Snape is on his side right? So didn't he have two faithful servants at Hogwarts? 






Image and video hosting by TinyPic
                                     DS is 1DAF

"I realize I say the word fuck a lot, and I'd like to apologize but I don't give a shit." -Lewis Black

Re: Harry Potter ?'s (MAJOR nerd alert)

  • This post is hilarious! ;)
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Loading the player...
  • 1) Buckbeak was never killed. They didn't watch it happen. They saw them walk out toward the garden, heard the chop, heard hagrid sobbing, and assumed. The executioner was angry that Buckbeak was missing and lost his temper and chopped something else.

    Time traveler Harry saw the "regular" Harry about to die and sent the patron us to save himself. Remember there were two versions of himself there. Regular Harry assumed it was someone else who saved him. Time travel Harry knows the truth.


    image image
  • 2) he thinks Snape left him. Snape managed to convince him later that was not true and then Voldemort trusted him again.


    image image
  • 1. The two stories overlap since it's the whole space-time continuum stuffs. So Buckbeak never died. When they went through it the first time there was also future Harry. So, when you think about it they are constantly looping those events since when one Harry wakes up in the hospital wing, they go back in time and become future Harry during the same events. It also makes that whole year confusing as there are so many Hermiones replaying the same classes and exams over again in different realities just always relooping things.

    2. Snape waited to got to Voldemort so that Dumbledore would think he's still good. This way he can stay as a spy at Hogwarts. In reality Snape was really Dumbledore's guy and went back to Voldemort on his command. Snape was very good ac acclumency, so Voledmort never suspected.
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickersLilypie Third Birthday tickersImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • I guess because there are so many alternate realities going on that things are always in a loop. It might be that there was never a first event, just the same events repeating. Time travel stuff is always confusing.
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickersLilypie Third Birthday tickersImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • LexiLupin said:

    It's not the sequence of events that confuses me but rather the question of how the time travel loop gets started in the first place. How is it that no one had to make the conscious plan the first time to fix things?
    Kind of a deus ex machina thing going on I guess?

    Dumbledore started the loop.

    He was at the failed execution. He knew that Buckbeak didn't die. He likely knew the the regular trio was on the hill (I believe he could see or sense through the invisibility cloak), but even if he didn't, he still knew that someone saved Buckbeak and that it seemed no one was in a position to be able to do so.

    Then he was in the hospital wing and knew Hermione had that time turner and he knew she and Harry could have been the ones to save Buckbeak... And that if they did, they could also save Sirius.


    image image
  • LexiLupin said:
    This is the BEST thread today. I need to go reread all the books.
    ME TOO.
    It's been quite enjoyable. Like coming back to an old friend. 

    I said the above to DH at dinner earlier, and he was like "WOW, you're a nerd." Ah well, sometimes you must face the truth. 



    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
                                         DS is 1DAF

    "I realize I say the word fuck a lot, and I'd like to apologize but I don't give a shit." -Lewis Black
  • I just started Book 5, so there could be more question threads coming. Prepare yourselves! 



    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
                                         DS is 1DAF

    "I realize I say the word fuck a lot, and I'd like to apologize but I don't give a shit." -Lewis Black
  • LexiLupin said:

    LexiLupin said:

    It's not the sequence of events that confuses me but rather the question of how the time travel loop gets started in the first place. How is it that no one had to make the conscious plan the first time to fix things?
    Kind of a deus ex machina thing going on I guess?

    Dumbledore started the loop.

    He was at the failed execution. He knew that Buckbeak didn't die. He likely knew the the regular trio was on the hill (I believe he could see or sense through the invisibility cloak), but even if he didn't, he still knew that someone saved Buckbeak and that it seemed no one was in a position to be able to do so.

    Then he was in the hospital wing and knew Hermione had that time turner and he knew she and Harry could have been the ones to save Buckbeak... And that if they did, they could also save Sirius.
    I would argue that Dumbledore recognized the loop and ensured it continued. Not that he started it. Not that we see anyway.
    But I don't think my question has an answer.



    But see, a time loop doesn't really HAVE a start. It just is.


    image image
  • I want to read the books but I don't own them. I'm fairly certain my cousin took them and "forgot" to return them.

    The cost of the set makes me flinch.

    But I want them.


    image image
  • 1) Buckbeak was never killed. They didn't watch it happen. They saw them walk out toward the garden, heard the chop, heard hagrid sobbing, and assumed. The executioner was angry that Buckbeak was missing and lost his temper and chopped something else.

    Time traveler Harry saw the "regular" Harry about to die and sent the patron us to save himself. Remember there were two versions of himself there. Regular Harry assumed it was someone else who saved him. Time travel Harry knows the truth.

    This!
  • LexiLupin said:
    Didn't they just come out with special edition covers? (Maybe just UK version?) My books 1-4 could seriously use replacing, I want something fun!
    They did just do some special edition covers. They look awesome. Go look at the freaking Swedish covers. They kick ass. I keep trying to get SO to buy them for my collection.
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickersLilypie Third Birthday tickersImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • There's used sets of all 7 on amazon for around $35! I buy used books off amazon all the time and have never had any quality issues. Just FYI! 



    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
                                         DS is 1DAF

    "I realize I say the word fuck a lot, and I'd like to apologize but I don't give a shit." -Lewis Black
  • Now I want to go back and re-read all of the books. I did that several years ago, and it was great. I have all of the movies, but haven't watched them all.
  • The Order of the Phoenix came out while I was in London on a trip so I have that copy in the British edition. It's pretty cool!
    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"