I saw a post from earlier today about interviewing pediatricians, and it reminded me of this question that I had.
Does any one have a preference for pediatricians vs. family medicine doctors? From what I have read, family medicine docs basically provide the same services for children as peds docs do, except they can treat the whole family. Does anyone have strong feelings toward one type or the other? What are the benefits of one vs. the other? Does your family all see one doctor, or do you go to different doctors?
Re: Pediatrician vs. Family Medicine Doctor
All the outcomes-based studies I've seen pretty much all show that generalists are just as good at taking care of kids as pediatricians. It's just that pediatricians can deal with the extreme stuff. I just don't see how a pedi would be any better at giving vaccines and diagnosing bronchiolitis than a family doc, and only the family doc can treat the whole family the way I very fondly remember "Denny" doing (actually, Grampa still sees him!)
I'm a bit of a special case, though, because I'm certified in family practice myself (although my current practice is 99% adult). This a) biases me in favor of generalists, and b) gives me the UTMOST confidence that between the family practice doc that I trust, and my own knowledge, we're not going to miss anything, and my kid will be appropriately referred if necessary.
I guess I'm even further biased because neither I nor my husband nor any of our sibs ever had a childhood illness more dramatic than ear infections and chicken pox. Totally manageable by a family provider.
ETA: Oh, and to further bias me, one of my BFFs is a family practice doc.
So even though I couldn't have her do my deliveries she takes care of DS and I, and will be the primary for these two as well. I trust her and she's been fantastic, even with DS's extra issues at the beginning.