Twinkie Tush fluff mail! ***edited w/ PIP!

Re: Twinkie Tush fluff mail! ***edited w/ PIP!

• Bemyselfandi member

  January 2014

  Pics

  ">
  
  
  
  

  Report0 Reply
• Loading the player...
• Into+the+Kitty member

  January 2014

  Pictuuuuure

  
  
  Suddenly my life doesn't seem such a waste,
  It all revolves around you.
  

  Report1 Reply
• Into+the+Kitty member

  January 2014

  Seriously, your badge should be 'Waddatease!'

  
  
  Suddenly my life doesn't seem such a waste,
  It all revolves around you.
  

  Report4 Reply
• Danie007 member

  January 2014

  MUST. SEE. PICTURES!!!!!

  
  

   

  
  

  }

  Report0 Reply
• freezorburn member

  January 2014

  Will post pic tonight after I've put DS to bed.
  

  Report3 Reply
• JEPES1348 member

  January 2014

  I'm so jealous of all these new Twinkie Tushes! I don't know how I haven't justified buying one to myself yet!

  
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  Report0 Reply
• emw9985 member

  January 2014

  I got my first 3 like 2 weeks ago.  Bought another one today and am contemplating another one yet!  Addicted.  Welcome to the club!  And yes, pics please!

  
  

  
  

  
  

  Erin-30.  Dealing with severe endo. 

  Married to DH-29.  Possible low sperm count/low motility.

  Harper-born 2/28/13

  TTC #2 for 21 months and counting...after 2 laps/HSGs and 9 rounds of clomid, next step, consult with RE.

  Report0 Reply
• Unknown

  January 2014

  This content has been removed.
• unaveragejane member

  January 2014

  Into+the+Kitty said:

  Seriously, your badge should be 'Waddatease!'

  I had a slightly dyslexic moment where this looked like you were giving her a very inappropriate anatomical nickname.
  

               

  
  

  

    

      
  

   
  

  
  

   
  

  Report3 Reply
• Danie007 member

  January 2014

  Awww...so pretty and soft looking.

  
  

   

  
  

  }

  Report0 Reply
• freezorburn member

  January 2014

  Softest diapers ever!
  

  Report0 Reply
• freezorburn member

  January 2014

  Yes but these are so soft I want to pet them and feed them and call them George.
  

  Report3 Reply
• Danie007 member

  January 2014

  Chickypoo2468 said:

  Not to be a downer... But the reason they're so great is bc they're so absorbent, which is because there are so many layers, correct?

  Yes
  
  

  
  

   

  
  

  }

  Report0 Reply
• emw9985 member

  January 2014

  Chickypoo2468 said:

  Not to be a downer... But the reason they're so great is bc they're so absorbent, which is because there are so many layers, correct?

  I believe so.  They are my first and only fitteds and I do love them so far.  My favorite part is all of the gorgeous prints they come out with!  They just seem like they'd be so comfy to wear!
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  Erin-30.  Dealing with severe endo. 

  Married to DH-29.  Possible low sperm count/low motility.

  Harper-born 2/28/13

  TTC #2 for 21 months and counting...after 2 laps/HSGs and 9 rounds of clomid, next step, consult with RE.

  Report0 Reply
• Danie007 member

  January 2014 edited January 2014

  Chickypoo2468 said:

  freezorburn said:

  Yes but these are so soft I want to pet them and feed them and call them George.
  

  LLOL
  
  k but so for those of us that just can't take the plunge, they're not trimmer than normal right? So adding inserts to what we have is the same idea?
  
  I'm totally not trying to rain on anyone's parade. They look super soft and squishy.

  I don't have one, but I'm pretty sure they are fairly bulky.

  
  

   

  
  

  }

  Report0 Reply
• kldole3 member

  January 2014

  Are they similar to Sbish OBF in bulkiness or are they more so? Trying to determine if I want to try. You ladies talking it up make me want to give it a shot, but she's not soaking through an OBF right now unless she wakes up multiple times in the night to nurse.

  Report1 Reply
• Into+the+Kitty member

  January 2014

  bookitup said:

  I only have regular TT, which I'm assuming are less bulky than TTNN.  The TT I have are definitely bulkier than OBF. However, TT are OS: OBF are not. I wish I had just bought some TT in the beginning and skipped the OBF size medium. But if you are looking for something for a smaller baby during the early months (for us this wouldn't have been worth it because he didn't STTN until after 6 months, anyway) I'd go with OBF.

  
  

  Geez, I feel like I just wrote a secret code...all those abbreviations! 

  
  Lol this brought me back to my lurking days when the whole board looked like a foreign language to me. I remember thinking, 'Gosh, this is all so complicated!' Except probably adding a few expletives in there.

  
  
  Suddenly my life doesn't seem such a waste,
  It all revolves around you.
  

  Report5 Reply
• freezorburn member

  January 2014

  If this helps, here is a photo of the diapers laid out. The lighter one is the regular fitted, the darker one is the TTNN.
  
  The inserts are thinner and not as stiff as Sbish inserts. The long inserts double over and have snaps in the center. So you have lots of options to customize the absorbency with these. The diaper itself is pretty similar between the fitted and the NN, the difference is how the snaps are laid out in the NN for the additional soaker.
  
  I'll comment on trimness once I have had a chance to try them out on DS. I think the ability to customize how many layers I use will make a big difference.
  
  I'm excited about the snaps. My Sbish are snapless and I am looking forward to some ON-worthy fitteds that can be put on without pins. I don't mind pinning, but I mind being the only person in the house who can pin a diaper.
  
  As it happens, I find Sbish pretty trim, but when I use both inserts then I don't get a great fit at the crotch. The Sbish inserts are so thick that they  push the crotch away from DS's legs and there's a bit of a gap. Haven't had any leaks from this, but if I have, then my wool cover has been a great second line of defense.
  

  photo.JPG 109.2K

  Report5 Reply
• nanabanana06

  January 2014

  The reason TTs are so nice is that, yes they are very absorbent. However, the way they are cut allows for much longer use as they are cut very large. So my chunky monkey fit one great. They look fab on a toddler as well. The materials are very plush and high quality as well, plus the prints are adorable. Many people do save 10 $ and buy Goodmamas since they were the old version of TT. However, Goodmamas are cut much smaller and only has 1 soaker. It's not nearly as absorbant as a TT. TTNNs on the other handare sslightly bigger and bulkier, but they have a wonderfully huge wetzone soaker and 19 total layers of OBF instead of 11 like a regular TT. I love both. The TTNNs were the only solution I've found for ON though. That giant ass soaker is the key there. It's amazing. I use the regular TTs for pics and daytime now.

  

  Report3 Reply
• ElleBeeDub member

  January 2014

  So... I'm really jealous of all of you who have TTs and S'bish. I would LOVE more fitteds, but can't justify the cost when my (2nd-hand zombified) BSRBs work just fine. Lucky for me, I HATE fold down rise. I'm pretty sure it's the only thing standing between me and a Batman TT.

   

  

  
  

  Report0 Reply
• joyfultrex member

  January 2014

  Nana_Osaki06 said:

  The reason TTs are so nice is that, yes they are very absorbent. However, the way they are cut allows for much longer use as they are cut very large. So my chunky monkey fit one great. They look fab on a toddler as well. The materials are very plush and high quality as well, plus the prints are adorable. Many people do save 10 $ and buy Goodmamas since they were the old version of TT. However, Goodmamas are cut much smaller and only has 1 soaker. It's not nearly as absorbant as a TT. TTNNs on the other handare sslightly bigger and bulkier, but they have a wonderfully huge wetzone soaker and 19 total layers of OBF instead of 11 like a regular TT. I love both. The TTNNs were the only solution I've found for ON though. That giant ass soaker is the key there. It's amazing. I use the regular TTs for pics and daytime now.

  thanks for this, I've always wondered about the difference between goodmamas and TT. TT gets much more love on this board, but I've heard people in other places rave about goodmama. I think I will continue to save up for a TT one day.
  

  

  
  <a href="http://www.thebump.com/?utm_source=ticker&utm_medium=HTML&utm_campaign=tickers" title="Parenting Tips"><img src="http://global.thebump.com/tickers/tt1d74a9" alt=" Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker" border="0"  /></a>
  

  
  

  
  

   

  Report1 Reply
• Unknown

  January 2014

  This content has been removed.
• freezorburn member

  January 2014

  SecretAgentKate said:

  So if your kid is just an average wetter and not a heavy wetter, a regular TT would likely get you through ON or no?

  Just based on handling the diapers out of the box, I would say yes, but I will let you know for sure over the weekend.
  

  Report0 Reply
• nanabanana06

  January 2014

  SecretAgentKate said:

  So if your kid is just an average wetter and not a heavy wetter, a regular TT would likely get you through ON or no?

  Absolutely. It's what I used ON for Rosie for a time and for Cade before he started peeing more.

  

  Report0 Reply
• freezorburn member

  January 2014

  DS is still under 19 lbs. and only occasionally saturates his Sbish snapless. Most nights I don't even add another hemp doubler like many people do.
  
  I'm guessing with the TTNNs I won't need to use all of the inserts initally. For one thing I don't think he needs that much absorbency, and for another I think they'll fit better with fewer inserts. It's nice to have a diaper with room to grow.
  
  
  

  Report1 Reply