Working Moms

daycare vs nanny?

I've been back at work for 2 weeks part-time (I go back full time after the new year).  DS currently goes to daycare 2 days a week and we've already had a few issues with them.  One was more of an issue than the others - the afternoon lady who takes over after his primary caregiver leaves told my husband that I had said not to overfeed the baby so she was letting him cry a bit before giving him a bottle (which I never in a million years would have said, I was wondering why he consistently ate 1 bottle less than I was sending).  We spoke with that woman as well as the director of the daycare and hopefully that is now resolved.  The other issues were small - his primary caregiver keeps calling him by the wrong name (the name of someone she has in the early morning, so she says) and on his daily log one day an activity listed was "looking around the room" (so basically he was just left in a chair to entertain himself???  they never really clarified this when we asked).  He's also the youngest at 3 1/2 months, the rest of the kids in his infant room are either crawling or walking and aren't as dependent on the caretakers for every activity.

My husband brought up looking into getting a nanny.  But I'm not 100% sold on them.  I get it will be more individual attention and there's the added bonus of not having to rush out of work early to pick him up, or even rushing in the morning to get him out the door so I can make my train.  But my concern is that he'll lose out on the socialization aspect of daycare and the whole "learning from watching the older children".  Also, in my own "mommy guilt" kind of way I feel that if we have a nanny that takes him to Gymboree and storytime at the library, etc I'll be jealous that I should be taking him to that stuff.

Anyone care to share their experience with choosing daycare vs a nanny?  If we have another issue with this daycare then we'll pull him out, but we do have other dc options if we don't go the nanny route.  We haven't priced out nannies, but I know that dc in our area isn't the cheapest so it might not be that much of a difference.  And while we have a guestroom I wouldn't want a live-in nanny.  Just someone who comes to our house M-F while we're at work.
Lilypie First Birthday tickers

Re: daycare vs nanny?

  • I understand your feelings.  We had DS1 in an in-home daycare that ended up closing right after I had DS #2.  After my maternity leave, we put both boys in a center, and I really was unhappy with them there.  I can see how it's great for many other kids and parents, but it was just so different (for me, in ways that felt negative) to the small, in-home setting we were used to.  I felt a lack of personal attention and care, and that my 4 month old was literally in a swing all day.  Anyway, we decided to look into the nanny route, and we couldn't be happier.  We have a live out nanny too - her hours are set from 8:15am - 5:15pm M-F.  We pay her weekly, in cash.  We wrote up a contract (found the template on Care.com), and had her sign it before starting with us, and it covers everything from TV time, to meals, to visitors, etc.  We give her 10 paid days to take per year (vacation or sick), in addition to the holidays I get off from work (there are 13 days).  We also give her off the week in between Christmas and New Years, because I am off during that time.  It has been awesome not having to prepare lunches for daycare, get them out the door in the morning, no drop offs/pick ups, etc.  What we pay her actually ends up being less than what we would have paid daycare for the 2 boys (not by a lot, but still!).  She does take them on scheduled trips during the week, and I too was a little jealous at first.  But, you'll quickly realize your happier with the childcare situation overall, and that they are having fun!  So, they do get interaction at library story times, and all the other kids places she takes them.  When hiring her, one of our requirements was someone who created a daily list of activities for the kids.  So, each month, she creates a calendar of weekly "themes", a monthly number and letter, and then daily activities that correspond to all of that.  She will write out a list of supplies that she needs each month, and we'll buy it all for her.  It works out awesome.  

    Like I said, everyone has different preferences and feelings on childcare, and I'm not knocking centers for anyone else.  However, for us, a nanny was the right fit.  Good luck!
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • Loading the player...
  • DS is in a larger day care center and overall we are happy with it. My childcare situation fell apart very last minute and I basically had 1 week to find something else. I interviewed 4 nannies and cried with each one that came over. I just was not comfortable and didnt have time to keep interviewing people, and then would want to have them shadow me for a bit to get used to DS schedule. We went the day care route and its been working out. My biggest complaints are: taking him out in the cold at 7am (we dont wake him, he gets up earlier than that on his own but still stinks to get him out of the house that early) and the amount he has gotten sick the first year. Other than that he has great socialization, the center sends me pictures every day if i want, they do a ton of activities and i know his teachers love him. nothing is perfect....you would have gripes with either situation...you just need to pick your battles and figure out whats most important to you. People have great stories with both nannies and day care.

  • Nanny all the way here.  Never even considered the alternative.  The benefits far outweigh the perceived negatives you mention.  If you can afford the nanny, I would go for it.

    First, on the socialization aspect.  Consider if you were a SAHM, your child would only be with you.  Would you be worried then?  How would you address?  You would take them to Gymboree, etc.  So your nanny will do this.  As to feeling jealous about your nanny doing those things, I don't see it any differently than a daycare getting to spend that time with your child.  So you just have to realize that for either need or want, you are working.  Someone else is getting to spend that time with your child (which incidentally is good for them to see you working and them getting more love all around).  It's additive, not replacement.  Just make the time you get count.  Put down the iPhone, turnoff the TV and interact.  Your child will always have a special relationship with you despite having a great one with the nanny.  That's really want you hope for; that your child loves your nanny.  When I'm at work, my kids ask for me all the time.  And when I'm home, they ask for our nanny.  I don't let it hurt my feelings.  It just is.

  • We went with a nanny for a number of reasons.  My DH travels quite a bit for work, and I have an hour commute each way.  It was going to be really difficult for me to get to daycare for pick-up when he was out of town.  Also, DD1 was 4 weeks early, during a time when H1N1 was at its peak.  We have an issue of respiratory issues in my family, and she would have been going to daycare in January.  I thought it best to keep her out of daycare for her first year, and then re-evaluate.  Things went pretty well, so we stuck with our nanny.

    As far as socialization, both DD's are with other kids a ton.  There's music, gymnastics, swim, tennis, trips to the park, storytime at the library or local bookstores, nature walks, etc.  DD1 is in preschool now 3 days a week (she's 4).  Our nanny meets all the other parents, so DD1 even has playdates during the week.  

    Benefits: greater flexibility, we're not jamming all DD's activities in on the weekend, our nanny routinely picks up the house, throws in laundry, etc., no rushing out the door in the morning, I don't miss work when the kids are sick (unless they're really sick and I want to stay home), and they're really not sick that often.

    Cons: we need to scramble a bit for back-up care when she's sick.  We can usually plan for vacation time, and I get 20 free days per kid per year at a back-up center through work. 

    We went through 2 nannies before we found our current.  She can be quirky (who can't??) but she's wonderful.  She loves my kids, and they love her.  And I love her.  She does things with the kids that I just can't.  I'm not crafty - she's incredibly talented, so she teaches DD everything.  I'm not really into seasonal decorations, and she is, so with my permission, she made beautiful Christmas decorations and decorated my whole freaking house on Monday.  In general, I don't worry about the kids when she's with them, and she makes all of our lives easier.

    Good luck with your decision!!!
  • My girls (4 and 2) have always gone to a large daycare center (since 12 weeks), and we're very happy with it. Sure, there have been some ups and downs, but I think you'll have those with any childcare provider. Personally, I like the oversight and regulations that are required for daycare centers. I like that I never have to scramble to find a provider because someone is sick or has an emergency. I'm also not sure I would be comfortable with someone else being in my home everyday. I know there are people who feel differently and have had great nannies that have worked out really well for them.

    I think a lot of the "problems" you're experiencing now are kind of just part of being new to daycare. Some of them (like the bottle issue) could also happen with a nanny. I really believe that as you become more comfortable with daycare and as they get to know your son better, you won't feel the same way about these things. For example, the activity "looking around the room" at 3 months wouldn't bother me at all.

    For what it's worth, my girls love their daycare (school). They're almost always excited to go there. They have great friends and teachers, and they learn so much. I wouldn't have it any other way.  
    Lilypie Fifth Birthday tickers Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
  • I know it's hard trusting some one else to care for your baby when you first go back to work but I don't think any of the concerns you raise are big red flags. I think letting baby cry for a few minutes before a feeding isn't that big a deal in the grand scheme of things because in practical terms, there will be numerous occasions in which your kid starts to cry but something more urgent with another kid means the staff take 2-5 minutes to pick up yours. That's what happens in group care and what you'd have to do yourself if you had twins. The other thing is that daycare providers often do, in fact, overfeed young infants and rely excessively on bottles for comfort because it's easy, when the kid should get other forms of comfort as well - like rocking, holding, singing, etc. So, I wouldn't take that as a sign of bad judgment, but you talked to the staff and director and I'm sure they'll be happy to just give your kid a bottle next time he cries. It is easier for them, so no reason not to if that's what you want. To your second concern, looking around the room - that is a form of stimulation for a 3 month old. I think that's legit, especially if your kid seemed content while doing it. They learn a lot by staring at shapes, colors, other kids playing, etc. 

    Your daycare sounds fine to me based on what you've described, but all that said, if I could afford a nanny to come to my home and take care of washing bottles and baby clothes during naps, I would definitely go for it. It would make my life so much easier. When I traveled for work and temporarily hired a local nanny, it was amazing how much easier my day to day tasks were, even though I was solo parenting on a work trip without my husband. If you can swing it, why not? You can shift back to a daycare/preschool when your kid is older. 
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    BabyFruit Ticker
  • I love daycare, but socialization is really a non-issue for at least the first year.  The important thing is bonding with caregivers, whether that is a daycare teacher or a nanny.  That is really odd that your LO's main teacher calls him the wrong name.  There are pros and cons to both daycare and nannies, and only you can decide what is best.  But maybe this particular daycare is not a good fit for you.  Don't judge them all by what you see at this one.
    DS born 8/8/09 and DD born 6/12/12.
  • Thanks for your insight.  I think I may try to convince DH to keep him in daycare for now and see how it goes once I'm full-time in January.

    And with the crying before a bottle, I didn't want to write a novel in my OP, but the lady actually told my husband that DS "exhausted himself crying because he was hungry", meanwhile he had 2 full bottles in the fridge.  Then when we spoke to her about it she said she never said that.  That was what caused the concern.

    I'm off during the holidays but will put him in daycare for part of the day on days he's usually there, so I'll just show up to pick him up unannounced and see what they're doing with him.
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • amy052006 said:
    Personally, I think "socialization" of an infant is a complete load of crap.  It's absolutely not necessary.  A mobile toddler learning about interacting with the world, sure.  But to me, I would definitely prefer one on one care in my home under the age of 12-18 months.

    We started DS1 is a great, highly ranked daycare at three months.  Within two days they started requesting more breastmilk.  His naps were shit. The sickness was constant.  

    When I went to PT, we pulled him, and he transitioned to pre-school at just before three this year with no issues.  If socialization was THAT important as an infant, pre-school would start earlier.

    While I agree with you about socialization being crap for babies, I would like to point out that there are many excellent daycares where young babies thrive.  There are centers where the importance of bonding closely with consistent caregivers is emphasized.  Not everyone can choose to hire a nanny or work part-time or have family care for LO or SAH.  They can still choose wonderful, safe care for their babies.  Don't judge all centers by your one experience and stop daycare-bashing on the WM board.
    DS born 8/8/09 and DD born 6/12/12.
  • I do an in home daycare here. My babysitter doesn't keep more than 6 kids (even though she could take more) and she is also licensed by the state. I love her! Her prices are reasonable especially for an infant (daughter is now 10 months). However, my daughter did attend a center for about 6 weeks until the in home care spot opened up. I don't prepare any meals either. The only thing I supply is diapers and wipes. My babysitter makes all the food for the kids.
  • Curls218 said:
    Thanks for your insight.  I think I may try to convince DH to keep him in daycare for now and see how it goes once I'm full-time in January.

    And with the crying before a bottle, I didn't want to write a novel in my OP, but the lady actually told my husband that DS "exhausted himself crying because he was hungry", meanwhile he had 2 full bottles in the fridge.  Then when we spoke to her about it she said she never said that.  That was what caused the concern.

    I'm off during the holidays but will put him in daycare for part of the day on days he's usually there, so I'll just show up to pick him up unannounced and see what they're doing with him.
    Oh, okay that's different then. I don't think that's cool - baby should not be wailing to the point of exhaustion. I'm surprised they let two full bottles just sit in the fridge while that went on. It's good you brought that to the director's attention. 
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    BabyFruit Ticker
  • emberlee3 said:
    amy052006 said:
    Personally, I think "socialization" of an infant is a complete load of crap.  It's absolutely not necessary.  A mobile toddler learning about interacting with the world, sure.  But to me, I would definitely prefer one on one care in my home under the age of 12-18 months.

    We started DS1 is a great, highly ranked daycare at three months.  Within two days they started requesting more breastmilk.  His naps were shit. The sickness was constant.  

    When I went to PT, we pulled him, and he transitioned to pre-school at just before three this year with no issues.  If socialization was THAT important as an infant, pre-school would start earlier.

    While I agree with you about socialization being crap for babies, I would like to point out that there are many excellent daycares where young babies thrive.  There are centers where the importance of bonding closely with consistent caregivers is emphasized.  Not everyone can choose to hire a nanny or work part-time or have family care for LO or SAH.  They can still choose wonderful, safe care for their babies.  Don't judge all centers by your one experience and stop daycare-bashing on the WM board.
    I am with you. Personally we can afford a nanny and day care just the same and we have been happy with LOs day care. I think he is nurtured and cared for. I have popped in without notice and often seen DS sitting in the teachers lap singing a song, etc, and hes 10 mos old. Plenty of centers are really wonderful.
  • I haven't read all the PP, so apologies if it has already been said.  I think it greatly depends on finding the right center and/or the right nanny.  DS goes to a very good DC and we are very happy with it.  Every teacher there knows him by name and I feel like they genuinely care about him.  But some centers aren't as great.  Same with nannies - one of my friends have a fantastic nanny who takes her 2 boys out to activities every day and has multiple play dates a day.  Her boys are engaged and active all the time.  But I also have friends whose nannies don't do much with the kids. 

    Personally, I think that a great nanny is harder to find than a great center.  That's why we are keeping DS in a DC.  However, DS didn't go to DC until he was about 10 months (he was watched by my parents before that) and I feel like that was the right age.  I think it would be hard for me emotionally to put a very young infant in DC.

  • OK, well I will share my personal experiences with pros and cons of both daycare and nanny.

    DS went to daycare starting at 6 weeks.  His main teacher had been in the very same classroom taking care of babies for 17 years.  The other main teacher (2 teachers, 8 babies) had been there 6 years.  Both were warm, loving, joyful women.  DS was always being held and doted on; the teachers sat on the floor and snuggled the babies, read books, sang songs, etc.  I learned a great deal from them.  There was only 1 floater for the room, so the caregivers were very consistent.  The only con was that DS was sick all.the.time.  We had my mom to help, and my job was a bit more flexible then, so I could take a few sick days.

    DD had a nanny share for the first year.  She got sick less, and DS could stay with the nanny if he couldn't go to school.  The nanny herself was great, very helpful, experienced, and reliable.  The cons were the expense and the fact that I didn't enjoy being an employer.  At 1, DD started daycare, and it has been wonderful for her.  I can't say enough about how much I love my children's school.  My employer now offers back-up care, so I think if we decide to have a third child, I will send the baby to daycare.
    DS born 8/8/09 and DD born 6/12/12.
  • FemShepFemShep member
    edited December 2013
    There's no right or wrong answer.  For me, personally, I've had great and OK experiences with daycare centers and a terrible experience with a nanny.

    DD1 was in an amazing daycare center from 10 weeks until 3 1/2.  We only switched her because we moved.  The franchise was run by a family, and it really did feel like they saw her as part of their family.  I loved the constant supervision and accountability, never needing backup care, and the socialization she got.  She also had a runny nose for pretty much her entire first winter, which sucked, but she's been sick very little since.  It's been my experience with two LOs that they'll get sick frequently whenever they go to "school" for the first time.  

    When we moved, we had to find a daycare center on short notice in Boston-easier said than done.  We ended up at a center that was ok, and I had no complaints about the care she received or her teachers, but I didn't love it the way I did with her first center.  DD1 started school the following fall, and a few years later, we engaged a nanny to pick her up and care for her after school.

    The nanny experience was terrible.  While the nanny was nice, and clearly cared about DD1, there were many, many issues.  She wanted to be paid under the table.  She had multiple minor car accidents.  Bad luck?  Maybe-but I didn't like her driving DD.  She asked inappropriately personal questions and shared personal information I didn't want to know.  After we dismissed her, we allowed her to continue to keep in touch with my daughter until, when DD1 told her we had to put our cat to sleep because of a very painful inflammatory bowel disease, she called me a murderer to DD1.  This was a woman who had excellent references and passed all of the standard background checks.

    So, especially given our good experience with a center and bad experience with a nanny, DD2 has also been at a center since 10 weeks.  She's bonded with her caregivers and with the other kids in her classrooms, and we've generally been very happy. I'm fortunate to have an employer that understands that I *must* leave by a certain time to pick her up, and I'm able to WFH or take PTO when either kiddo gets sick.

    That's my experience, YMMV.  But blanket generalizations, like nanny is always better or daycare is always better, are stupid.  Every family, and every child, is different.
  • From the jump I was skeptical with putting DS into the Child Development Center, and I never did. Even though it is convenient and right here on base, it just wasn't what I felt would be right for DS. For almost a year, my best friend lived right up the street and her Grandmother lived with her. She kept DS and was great with him, but we were starting to run into issues. She starting having a lot of medical appoitments, she would tell me last minute that I'd have to make alternate arrangements the day prior, ect. I found an in-home DC through my cousin, and I've never been happier. It's a small, cozy atmosphere, DS gets alont with the other kids great and overall we are all happy. So even though a large, Daycare Center wasn't the right fit for us, a smaller in-home worked out.
    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers
  • amy052006 said:

    emberlee3 said:


    amy052006 said:

    Personally, I think "socialization" of an infant is a complete load of crap.  It's absolutely not necessary.  A mobile toddler learning about interacting with the world, sure.  But to me, I would definitely prefer one on one care in my home under the age of 12-18 months.

    We started DS1 is a great, highly ranked daycare at three months.  Within two days they started requesting more breastmilk.  His naps were shit. The sickness was constant.  

    When I went to PT, we pulled him, and he transitioned to pre-school at just before three this year with no issues.  If socialization was THAT important as an infant, pre-school would start earlier.

    While I agree with you about socialization being crap for babies, I would like to point out that there are many excellent daycares where young babies thrive.  There are centers where the importance of bonding closely with consistent caregivers is emphasized.  Not everyone can choose to hire a nanny or work part-time or have family care for LO or SAH.  They can still choose wonderful, safe care for their babies.  Don't judge all centers by your one experience and stop daycare-bashing on the WM board.


    Sometimes the defensiveness on this board is out.of.control.  The OP wanted experiences.  Mine sucked.  That was actually his second daycare.  She does have the option, that's why she is asking.  So are people really not suppose to weigh in on the pros and cons because god forbid it hurts someone's feelings?  If you have a great daycare experience, by all means share it!

    Eh, I don't think she was really bashing.
    FWIW, I have been using the exact center Amy refers to since 2008. First my son started at six weeks, then my daughter. EBF for 6 and 12 months and napped like champs.
    The key, OP, is that you have to feel comfortable with your choice. Honestly, your description about what happened around him crying while hungry suggests that the caregiver is being dishonest. This would really bother me. Also, the wrong name would too. Especially if it was frequent. Maybe you could tour a few other centers and get an idea of what your other options are before you make any decisions.
    We have loved using a center but are considering a nanny next year solely bc of the flexibility we need. I'm not really thrilled about it because 1. I prefer not having someone in my house, 2. Having to deal with her sick days , and 3. The lack of accountability/backup/oversight. I like the team nature of a center.



  • I didn't read all of the prior posts but I truly do not understand this whole "socialization" idea for an infant under 1 (if not under 2). If you were a SAHM would you think it was bad bc he was not being socialized? He's 3.5 months--he doesn't need to be socialized. He needs to be fed on time and held instead of put down somewhere to "look around the room". Seriously! What exactly do you expect for him to do in terms of socialization? Play hide-n-seek w other kids? Have a tea party? He's 3.5 mos.

    There is NOTHING wrong with daycare. I repeat nothing. But if you're only choosing it bc you think he will be socialized and bc you'll be jealous if the nanny takes him to storytime them you have your priorities mixed up. You need to do what's best for your son at this time.

    For what it's worth we have a nanny, we love it, and my 13 month old is still not at a developmental age where she would socialize w other kids. At best she likes side-by-side play and that's fine. I'm not trying to rush her socialization. She's just fine. Remember before daycare people used to stay home with their kids more and they were none the worse. I think this whole socialization aspect of daycare is overplayed and I hate that people think having a nanny means your kid is going to be some anti social freak bc they weren't around other kids socializing from 6 weeks old!
    BFP#1 10/17/11, m/c due to SCH 11/21/11 @ 8w4d; BFP#2 2/26/12, baby girl arrived 11/1/12; BFP#3 12/3/13, EDD: 8/18/14.

    image

    image



  •  I agree with the socialization for a child not just under 1 but under 4 really is not necessary.  daycare is daycare. its not school. play is parallel. you can get them out and about even if not in daycare. it is ok if your choice (we did it for a while) and now we have a nanny. our lives are vastly easier and the kids are thriving
    This isn't always true.  

    I went to an in-home daycare, and didn't really get any prep for school.  I played with other kids *all the time*, but I wouldn't say it was helpful in adjusting to school or becoming better socialized.

    On the other hand, both DDs have gone/are going to daycare centers that follow specific curriculums and schedules.  DD1 had a *really* easy time adjusting to "school" (her teachers remarked on it consistently), in part because she thought she'd been going to "school" her entire life.  She was used to circle time, lines, schedules, writing, playing with others, she was ahead of other kids in her classroom in terms of life skills.....

    DD2 is 18 months, and while it's mostly parallel play, she does socialize constantly with her classmates.  The other day, when DH was dropping her off, she started to get sad and one of her classmates came over and gave her a hug.  I've seen multiple examples of behavior like this where kids learn to share, comfort, and play with each other, especially from 2-4.  Those social milestones are well documented.

    That's not to say a kid with a nanny (or an in-home DC) can't get practice socializing with other kids, or that they're not well-prepared for school.  But to say socialization isn't important before 4 ignores scientific fact, and to say that daycare isn't school is also not true for many programs.
  • I didn't read the other posts, but wanted to share my experience and opinion. We are financially able to afford either. I was dead set on not sending my kids to a center. I have always been against day care. Then I had my son and actually started looking into the options and we decided to put him in a day care center! Lol The first month or two was really tough as we both transitioned. There were times I considered pulling him out, but tried to be patient as the teachers learned about his needs. I learned I just needed to be more vocal. He is now 17 months and still there and he seems to really like it. He rarely if ever cries when we leave, his teachers just love all over him and I am absolutely going to put DS in the same place after my mat loa is over. (I'm due in 6 weeks). I really like that there are several teachers to hold each other accountable. For me, with a nanny, I was only comfortable going with someone I knew or knew someone I knew. I was worried they could be in my home all day not following my direction and I would never know. Best of luck to you. It is so hard at first but it does get easier!!
  • FemShep said:




     I agree with the socialization for a child not just under 1 but under 4 really is not necessary.  daycare is daycare. its not school. play is parallel. you can get them out and about even if not in daycare. it is ok if your choice (we did it for a while) and now we have a nanny. our lives are vastly easier and the kids are thriving

    This isn't always true.  

    I went to an in-home daycare, and didn't really get any prep for school.  I played with other kids *all the time*, but I wouldn't say it was helpful in adjusting to school or becoming better socialized.

    On the other hand, both DDs have gone/are going to daycare centers that follow specific curriculums and schedules.  DD1 had a *really* easy time adjusting to "school" (her teachers remarked on it consistently), in part because she thought she'd been going to "school" her entire life.  She was used to circle time, lines, schedules, writing, playing with others, she was ahead of other kids in her classroom in terms of life skills.....

    DD2 is 18 months, and while it's mostly parallel play, she does socialize constantly with her classmates.  The other day, when DH was dropping her off, she started to get sad and one of her classmates came over and gave her a hug.  I've seen multiple examples of behavior like this where kids learn to share, comfort, and play with each other, especially from 2-4.  Those social milestones are well documented.

    That's not to say a kid with a nanny (or an in-home DC) can't get practice socializing with other kids, or that they're not well-prepared for school.  But to say socialization isn't important before 4 ignores
    scientific fact, and to say that daycare isn't school is also not true for many programs.



    Yes but she is talking about socialization for a 3.5 month old! I mean c'mon. There are better reasons for daycare like oversight and money saving. Socialization at that age makes no sense.

    Also how do you know your first DD transitioned better to school bc of daycare? Unless you were able to simultaneously have her home w a nanny and in daycare I don't understand how you can make that statement. Maybe she would have transitioned well to school regardless of daycare, nanny or SAHM.

    I just feel like there's so much negativity and suspicion of nannies on this board and people who post get a skewered version.

    We could not function without my nanny and in addition to loving DD like her own, DD is learning a third language, is under constant supervision, has a great schedule and she helps with housekeeping. So many great benefits. Nannies should not be seen as spoiling children or for some uber rich. When our new baby arrives our nanny will take care of both of them, just like if I SAHM I would've had one on one with DD then parented both kids. I don't see what is so exotic or strange about having young children not preschool age stay at home and why this alleged benefit of daycare is so much better.
    BFP#1 10/17/11, m/c due to SCH 11/21/11 @ 8w4d; BFP#2 2/26/12, baby girl arrived 11/1/12; BFP#3 12/3/13, EDD: 8/18/14.

    image

    image



  • glaw said:

    Yes but she is talking about socialization for a 3.5 month old! I mean c'mon. There are better reasons for daycare like oversight and money saving. Socialization at that age makes no sense. Also how do you know your first DD transitioned better to school bc of daycare? Unless you were able to simultaneously have her home w a nanny and in daycare I don't understand how you can make that statement. Maybe she would have transitioned well to school regardless of daycare, nanny or SAHM. I just feel like there's so much negativity and suspicion of nannies on this board and people who post get a skewered version. We could not function without my nanny and in addition to loving DD like her own, DD is learning a third language, is under constant supervision, has a great schedule and she helps with housekeeping. So many great benefits. Nannies should not be seen as spoiling children or for some uber rich. When our new baby arrives our nanny will take care of both of them, just like if I SAHM I would've had one on one with DD then parented both kids. I don't see what is so exotic or strange about having young children not preschool age stay at home and why this alleged benefit of daycare is so much better.
    Just wanted to jump in here to say that we're hoping to keep DS at the same place for several years.  Not like I'm worried right this second about him being "social", but for a 2 1/2 year old it is something I'm looking for.
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • Well, lots of people start their kids in some form of in-home care and then switch around 2 or 3 to preschool. However, my son has been in the same small center since he was 3 months, and we love it. He's 2.5 now, and I really think he gets a lot out of his time there. I don't know when exactly I started noticing the good effects of socialization, but it's been for awhile now. I remember the first day moved up into a new classroom, at 16 months. He was quite a bit younger than the other kids in that room (20 months to age 3) and I wasn't really sure how that would go. I tuned into the webcam to watch, and the first thing they were doing was "circle time", where they put mats in a circle on the floor, and each child has an assigned mat that they sit on for a story, song, whatever. They stay there for about 15-20 minutes. I thought, oh man, there's no way Isaac is going to do this on his first day. I don't think I've seen him sit in one spot for 2 minutes, let alone 20. But lo and behold, they pointed out a mat for him and he plopped right down with the rest of them. He loves his classmates, he tells me all the time about the stuff they're doing, who he played with that day, etc. 

    I wouldn't worry at all about the time your LO spends just hanging out in a chair, as long as it's not all day. They really are learning at every moment at that age, he could be starting to focus his eyes on near and far objects, listening to the other children playing, waving his hands around to work on muscle control, etc. The screaming for a bottle is obviously a problem, but hopefully it's just a temporary miscommunication.
    Lilypie - (8zJg)Lilypie - (Eu83)
    image
  • I'm seriously side eyeing everyone here who doesn't think that infants notice or care about being around other infants. If you want to define socialization as solely talking and cooperative play, then you're right - infants certainly don't do that. But by 6 months mine were easily able to recognize their friends at daycare; they would smile and coo at each other, watch each other, copy each other. By 8/9 months they would sit together and "talk" in between their bouts of parallel play. They would hold hands and already had "favorite" friends. At 2 my son easily goes through the class picture reciting everyone's names. So if you think that socialization doesn't happen or isn't important until a child is 4 or in preschool, I have to wonder how much attention you pay to your kid.
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers Lilypie Second Birthday tickers
  • Maybride2 said:

    I'm seriously side eyeing everyone here who doesn't think that infants notice or care about being around other infants. If you want to define socialization as solely talking and cooperative play, then you're right - infants certainly don't do that. But by 6 months mine were easily able to recognize their friends at daycare; they would smile and coo at each other, watch each other, copy each other. By 8/9 months they would sit together and "talk" in between their bouts of parallel play. They would hold hands and already had "favorite" friends. At 2 my son easily goes through the class picture reciting everyone's names. So if you think that socialization doesn't happen or isn't important until a child is 4 or in preschool, I have to wonder how much attention you pay to your kid.

    RIGHT! I wonder how much attention YOU pay to your kid if you rely only on daycare for his socialization and development. Bc yes those of us with nannies keep our kids away from everyone else at all times. And no, infants and young toddlers don't need 40+ hours with other infants and toddlers. That is not the point of daycare. Btw, most of us with nannies do send our kids to preschool and do other activities like play dates and Gymboree. Apparently you do nothing with your kid bc he already gets all his socialization at daycare! Good for u! And yes, everyone who grew up in pre-daycare eras must be anti-social. Whatever did we do??? I don't know get together w family and friends???
    BFP#1 10/17/11, m/c due to SCH 11/21/11 @ 8w4d; BFP#2 2/26/12, baby girl arrived 11/1/12; BFP#3 12/3/13, EDD: 8/18/14.

    image

    image



  • Maybride2Maybride2 member
    edited December 2013
    HolyHell glaw, defensive much? If you read what I posted, I never said ANYTHING about nannies or SAHMs not providing anything. I said nothing about nannies - I've never had a nanny, I can't speak to having one. I can't answer that question and wasn't attempting to. The ONLY thing I said was that infants do socialize. And I never said that there was only one way that they could see other babies.

    And Amy, wtf? Seriously, wtf is your problem? No one is putting you or your choices down here, but holyshit do you come unhinged. I don't need to have a PhD in psychology to see that you have issues. But for poops and giggles, please share what makes YOU an expert on child development, please. Good for you that you work part time, want a cookie? Again - I wasn't making an argument against nannies/for daycare. I sure asshit wasn't saying that socialization was the reason I choose daycare. I stated that babies notice other babies and appreciate them. In whatever context. With a nanny, with a SAHM, with a fox, in a box, whatever.
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers Lilypie Second Birthday tickers
  • Well I certainly don't share that opinion. And I guess I'm not around enough anymore to know that people feel that way. My comments were solely addressing babies being social because humans are social creatures. I don't understand not seeing your child react to other children in whatever social context you have them in, whether it be siblings or daycare or Gymboree or cousins or kids at the park. Even if your infant can't/doesn't crawl over and hug other infants, they do watch them. However, I don't care what form of child care you use. If anyone else got the impression that I thought daycare was superior to all other forms of childcare for every family, I certainly don't think that and wasn't trying to imply anything of the sort.
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers Lilypie Second Birthday tickers
  • Maybride2 said:
    Well I certainly don't share that opinion. And I guess I'm not around enough anymore to know that people feel that way. My comments were solely addressing babies being social because humans are social creatures. I don't understand not seeing your child react to other children in whatever social context you have them in, whether it be siblings or daycare or Gymboree or cousins or kids at the park. Even if your infant can't/doesn't crawl over and hug other infants, they do watch them. However, I don't care what form of child care you use. If anyone else got the impression that I thought daycare was superior to all other forms of childcare for every family, I certainly don't think that and wasn't trying to imply anything of the sort.


    I am going to agree here. The post was taken out of context. It has nothing to do with nannies or daycares being a better choice...it has to do with the pure fact that babies do socialize before the age of 3/4 or whatever was assumed. whether its needed or necessary or anything else...they do enjoy being around other children and watching and observing. You can get that from day care....we do...and for me to get my fill we also do Little Gym on saturday mornings. If you have a nanny, its a great idea to get them involved in activities or organize play dates because kids enjoy it! I actually think DS gets a little bored at home with just me when I am off work! He likes the interaction and the stimulation and the activities at daycare like finger painting and circle time.

    The point is....kids of all ages like to socialize and its healthy for them. It can happen in many ways...but its good/necessary. I know for a fact that my mom was a SAHM and we never sat in the house all day we were constantly out and about with other kids from very very early on doing tummy time together, etc! Its all good.

    OP -- whatever you choose, it will be great. And the best part is, nothing is permanent so you can switch at anytime!`

  • I also have to agree with PP. I believe children get the MOST out of group care as preschoolers but they certainly still socialize as infants and toddlers. Their are great things about nannies and great things about centers... As long as your doing what is right for your LO and family then that is really all that matters!!
  • amy052006 said:
    Personally, I think "socialization" of an infant is a complete load of crap.  It's absolutely not necessary.  A mobile toddler learning about interacting with the world, sure.  But to me, I would definitely prefer one on one care in my home under the age of 12-18 months.

     

     


    I agree with this.  DD has gone to daycare since about 4 months old.  Luckily, our daycare has be amazing since the beginning.  As an infant DD was in a room with 2 teachers and only 4 total babies right in the hospital where I worked.  It was wonderful, but I know not everyone is lucky enough to have that situation. 

    DD really started socializing at 12-14 months.  She was an early walker and began playing with the other walkers pretty early as well.  From that point on, I would never have chosen a nanny over daycare.  But like I said, we've had no complaints with our centers and have been extremely lucky.

    If we do have another child, we will get a nanny for the baby for the first 10-12 months and continue to send DD to pre-school. 

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • I'm late to the convo here but....We have done both.  DS was in daycare from 12 weeks until 7 months, and then one of his teachers at DC became our nanny (I know, we are rebels like that).  She's been with us for just over a year now.  We LOVED the daycare a lot, honestly, but it was a convenience thing for us.  The daycare closest to us that I liked was 30 minutes away and then we had to walk to the train and then commute another 35 minutes to get to work.  So to get to our offices at 8:30, we left our house at 6:30.  I left my office at 5:00 but got home at 6:50.  Now to get to my office at 8:30 we leave the house at 7:20.  I leave the office at 4:45 and get home at 6:00.  That was huge for us.

    The other pluses in my mind were absolutely the personalized attention of course, and also (and this is huge for me with anxiety and OCD) a LOT LESS ILLNESS.  When DS was in daycare it was about 4 months and I think he got sick on average about once every month (cold, ear infection, whatever).  In the past year I'd say we average out at once illness every 2-3 months. 

    If you are concerned about the socialization aspect, our nanny brings her child with her to our house and he and DS are like two peas in a pod.  DS can only say like 10 words and one of them is her son's name.  A lot of nannies (in my research before I went back to work) do want to bring their own child and a bonus is they will usually work for a lower wage than nannies without children (because it's an added benefit to them that they don't have to pay for childcare for their own child).  Some people are very anti-nanny bringing her own kid (she'll neglect yours, etc.) but we have never found this to be the case and honestly I would be hesitant to get a nanny without her own child to bring along just because it has been a huge joy for DS to have a best friend come to play with him every day.

    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers 
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers 

    BFP #1 6/28/11 ~ EDD 3/7/12 ~ m/c 7/15/11 at 6w2d
    BFP #2 8/29/11 ~ EDD 5/12/12. 4/25/12: Our take home baby is here!
     BFP #3 8/27/13 ~ EDD 5/11/14.  4/27/14:  Our second take home baby is here!

  • Daycare vs. Nanny.

    Most of my rational was based on situations that happened to my sister and I (7 years difference).  When I was 2 my mom had a babysitter for me, who took me to her family gathering and didn't bring me home until midnight. My parents were filing a child abduction report when I was brought back (this was the days before cell phones).  With my sister, they had a trusted church member watching her, who ended up abusing her (hand bruises around the rib cage).

    Because of this I prefered a daycare center with multiple care takers around.  DD has 2 main teachers, but there are others who fill in for lunches.  Our daycare has at least 5 cameras in each classroom, everyone is CORI checked and certified and the center is routinely inspected.  This accountability made me feel much more comfortable.  While I know not every in-home care taker or nanny is a boogie man, I didn't want to risk putting my child in that situation.

    She adores her daycare teachers and has started reaching out to them to 'say goodbye'.  She smiles and lights up whenever she sees them.  So, I know I made the right desision for us.

    As far as the little issues... Include a note in the baby's lunch box or diaper bag with volumes of BM or Formula needed per bottle. If the baby is normally BF, the crying while the bottle is being made is inevidable (sp?).   The care taker needs to put milk in the bottle and warm it up and most likely wouldn't have a bottle ready to go (which may potentially go bad).  Label everything and the teachers will learn his name.  Keep the lack of 'activities' in perspective.  Looking around for a newborn is far more exciting for them as it is for you.  it was the same with DD, but as she got older it was easier for all during playtime.  And, she is DEEPLY bonded to her caretaker.  They don't always have time to write down that they read or sang to the baby.

    Sorry for how long this is, but I hope it helps a tiny bit.  Give your daycare a chance, especially if your baby seems content.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

  • snicksnacksnicksnack member
    edited January 2014
    We have just switched to a daycare center from a nanny type situation. My 18-month-old did great my 3.5-year old who goes to preschool part-time already came home aggressive and told me about kids fighting etc... I also witnessed the aggression of others and saw my daughter who is not aggressive have to get physical to fend off another little girl. This does not happen in her preschool. We are hoping it was just an oddity and not the norm given they are just coming off a holiday. If it ends up being the norm we are going the nanny route. In reality we work and can't be there to "control" how our kids are raised every second so the best we can do is find what works best for us. What I loved about one-on-one was the lack of illness, attention etc. what I love a out daycare is the structure and interaction. What I don't like a out daycare is the bad habits etc... That kids often pickup from other kids but in reality this will happen in school too so they can't be protected forever.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker BabyFruit Ticker
  • Adding my 2 cents.  We have an in-home daycare where there is actually a curriculum and all food is provided.  All we provide are diapers and wipes (and when DD was breast feeding, pumped milk).  I love our daycare provider!  DD is always very excited to see her in the mornings when I do drop off.  DD is only 18 months, but gets really excited seeing her friends.  She practically leaps out of my arms to go play with them.  It definitely makes being a working mom easier knowing that DD is happy where we are leaving her.

    Now that baby #2 is on the way, we have talked about maybe switching to a nanny or au pair, but a) I think that will probably still be cost prohibitive (and if we were to go the live-in route, we would lose our only guest room) and b) I think DD would miss her little friends.  I would love the flexibility of not having to rush home to pick up.

    I guess bottom line is find whatever makes you and LO happiest (and is within your budget).

    I guess bottom
    Check out my blog on Guinevere's growth: http://brendasbabybumpblog.blogspot.com/ Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • We started doing both once he was 18 months old.  A few hours each day at Montessori and then rest of day with nanny.

    Best of both worlds.
  • I would probably recommend a Nanny for the first 3 years.  Then on to a day care after that.  This gives the LO all the attention they need while small and then the social interaction with peers as they enter the toddler years.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"