Hi all,
I'm a bit of a lurker here. H and I are still a ways out from TTC, but yesterday I had a pretty amazing job opportunity presented to me that might move our date up. It's all good news, and yet I'm nervous about it.
One of the things that makes me (probably irrationally) nervous is my FIL. My H has two brothers, and while they were growing up my FIL was very physical with them when it came to discipline - I'm talking an open palm to the face for talking back, the flat side of a knife to their knuckles for putting their hands on the table, a belt buckle instead of his hand for a spanking, etc. Don't get me wrong - he's very proud of them and generally loving toward them, but the discipline methods seemed pretty extreme. I had the exact opposite experience: my dad is actually a developmental psychologist and used timeout very effectively with me up until the age of 13 or so. I was spanked exactly once, and it was by a teacher. My parents raised hell for it.
My H does not want to physically discipline his children. But I have this nagging fear that if we had boys my FIL might try to discipline them in "his way" if they act up at his house. You know - his house, his rules and all that. Now I don't think this would happen if we had girls (FIL wants a granddaughter desperately and would spoil her beyond recognition), but with boys it makes me really nervous. I will find a way to talk to H about this (eventually), but in the meantime, any thoughts? I actually mentioned this to my dad and he thinks I'm overreacting - but he did admit there are different "grandparenting styles" and you never really know what you're going to get. My FIL has no problem lecturing me about all sorts of things in life - how to do my job, how to spend my money, how to "be successful" and I have no doubt he will lecture me about parenting and discipline. A lecture I could handle - a physical demonstration would be going too far.
Is this entirely irrational? I'm very excited about this job opportunity, but when my H suggested moving the TTC date up a bit, I kind of panicked. Has anybody else faced this? Or am I just worrying (which I'm prone to do)?
Re: BOTB - am I being irrational?
Have a very serious talk with your husband again. Talk about your discipline styles and the actions you are going to take. It sounds as though you are both on the same page, which is great. But the two of you need to be on the same page regarding your father in law and any other family member. You two will have to decide what your plan of action will be IF your father in law decides to discipline your child(ren) the way he used to.
I can confidently say that if we found out ANYONE used physical discipline (spanking, slapping, hitting) they would not be allowed to see my son. Period. We don't hit/spank and no one has the right to do that. I would be livid!!! It wouldn't matter if it was my mom, dad, grandparents...
This crazy motherly/protective mode comes over you and you literally cannot turn it off.
My grandparents were pretty physical to their kids (my mom and uncles). They had belt that hung by the door and was frequently used. And a lot of spanking. However, my grandparents pretty much raised me and never once hit or spanked me. And they have never done anything to my son.
Your FIL could have changed. I wouldn't talk to him unless it comes up or you two could bring it up in passing - stating that you are not going to spank your child, etc.
I hope this helps!
Congrats on the job!
XxOo
You may be more nervous over just having a kid (like I am) and this uncertainty is displaced on to the possible future actions of the grandparents? If you markedly tell him that you only punish with time-outs or taking away toys, I think he will respect that since in the end YOU are the parents. You said nothing about him being abusive or a raging drunk that would make me think he would go around your wishes and smack your kid. If anything, you can tell him that if your kids act up at his place you want to dole out the punishment, that way you don't have to defend your parenting style or choice of punishment and still get to "deal" with the issue instead of him. Ultimately this is far down the road since kids don't really start acting up, deserving actual punishment until past the toddler stage.
Personally, I support the average spanking, and find this clip by comedian Russell Peters to be hilarious: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CpKKQrhqkw
BFP 6/15/14 EDD: 2/24/15
Nothing about him being abusive?? Did you miss the part about slaps to the face, being hit with knives, and hitting with nto just a belt, but the buckle? This man is clearly abusive, even if not a raving drunk, and there's NO guarantee he'd just respect what they say about discipline. (And also... since when is "raging drunk" a requirement for being an abuser?) He might, but this also may have to be a very hard line drawn by them. She's very right to worry in advance. From what little I know of my grandfather, I suspect he would have hurt my sisters or I. That's why my dad didn't give him the chance.
Nothing about him being abusive?? Did you miss the part about slaps to the face, being hit with knives, and hitting with nto just a belt, but the buckle? This man is clearly abusive, even if not a raving drunk, and there's NO guarantee he'd just respect what they say about discipline. (And also... since when is "raging drunk" a requirement for being an abuser?) He might, but this also may have to be a very hard line drawn by them. She's very right to worry in advance. From what little I know of my grandfather, I suspect he would have hurt my sisters or I. That's why my dad didn't give him the chance. I was taken aback by the use of the knives to whack on the knuckles, true. But slapping a child is not abuse, it is punishment. Abuse is using fists to beat a kid until bruised and bloody, whipping them for no good reason, or smacking them just for being in the way...yet harsh punishment methods are a parent's choice and are simply punishment for wrong-doings by a child, not abuse. There is a distinct difference. And the OP said the following, "Don't get me wrong - he's very proud of them and generally loving toward them, but the discipline methods seemed pretty extreme." For coming from a family that only used time-outs and never spanked, of course the FIL's punishments seem extreme to her. Even by old-time standards they are a bit extreme. She isn't concerned about him abusing her kids, but about him punishing her kids, because it is his punishment methods she doesn't like. Otherwise, if he was actually abusive I doubt she would have her kids would be over at his house unsupervised for such a long period of time to get in trouble and need to be punished to begin with.