I saw this on another board and found it extremely unsettling. This kind of thing has to be rare, right?
Summary: An Ohio couple tried to return their 9 year-old son to the state because he refused to get help for his behavioral issues.
I understand that sometimes when older children are fostered/adopted they can bring with them problems that make it absolutely possible to mesh with the family, but this poor child was adopted as a baby. I love and trust my PAP's and recognize this has to be rare, but I'm already so emotional these days. I'm so heartbroken for this boy and what this has to be doing to him.
Re: Couple tries to return their adopted son???
@CarolinaGirl2014 you have to believe that this isn't going to happen to your little one. This is a sad and tragic story of a broken family, that only made the news because it was a family formed through adoption, but it is in no way representative of adoptive families, even on a small scale.
@JaxxM where do you get your misinformation about adoption? Are you a member of the adoption triad (birth/expectant mother, (prospective) adoptive mother, or adoptee)? Because while it's true that adoptive families often ace issues other families do not and adopted individuals often experience and have to overcome trauma in their lives, it is in no way common for adoptions to disrupt or have to be dissolved, and to suggest so is abhorrent. I would argue that once is too often, but that's not what your post suggested, and the misinformation was irresponsible to spread on a board that prides itself in sharing accurate facts about adoption and support to all members of the triad.
as anyone who has followed my story for the past several years knows, I am committed to the advancement of ethical adoptions, and believe we have to face all the information and not sugar coat anything if we want adoptive families to be successful. Your comment that "this actually happens all too often" was flippant, and incorrectly gave the impression that this is a common occurrence, which it's not--even by the statistics you've provided. In response to an expectant mother who is expressing fears about her baby's future, and without any following qualifying statements, it was misinformation in the way any broad, over generalized statement could be. It did nothing to quell her concerns or even place situations in context. All it served to express was that bio families should be concerned that adoptive families would cut and run if things got too intense. If you had brought up that this happens sometimes, given some facts as to what plays into it when it's does, brought up ways families could find supports to prevent such situations, or even mentioned statistics upfront, it would have been a much more balanced response,and would have giving the OP the kind of comprehensive information you say she should have access to.
Citig rehoming websites as evidence of the prevalence of this would be he same as me saying that a website designed for support to families touched by the rare disease nuerofibromatosis (NF) is evidence that NF is a common disease. Just because there are online communities for a particular issue where people facing a particular issue exchange ideas does not mean that it is common.
my point was never to compare bio and adoptive families. My point was that these stories only make the press because they are about adoptive families.
Finally, as Fred pointed out, dissolutions and disruptions are not remotely comparable. Disruptions can occur for myrad reasons, many of which have absolutely nothing to do with the prospective adoptive family. A formerly us identified birth parent could come forward and assert his/her parental rights. A kinship placement could be found. The caseworkers could decide that the child needs treatment Ina location away from the prospective adoptive family. And yes, the child, caseworker, court, or family could decide that the placement might not work well as a permanent setting. The reason that disruptions are so much more common than dissolutions in domestic adoptions is because domestic and foaster adoptions allow time for burn families to revoke their consent and for children and prospective adoptive families to "try out" living situations before adoptions are finalized, typically, in older-child adoptions, when children often have difficult behaviors or challenges as a result of the trauma they've experienced. Most international adoptions are finalized before the child leaves the country together, so their is no trial period similar to that in domestic adoptions, and if things really aren't working out and the family cannot find appropriate supports, dissolution is one of the only options available.
we are until forever...
check out our blog
At this point, I have the choice of using statistics and different calculations to battle it out with you, which you seem so determined to do, or I could back away, and hope and pray that CarolinaGirl sees through to what's at the heart of the matter hear: in adoption, all members take a giant leap of faith. You have to trust that all the other people involved are just as committed as you, or it will never work.
@CaroliaGirl2014 I believe that in your heart of hearts you know what's best for your baby. Follow that, and believe I the people you have come to know as the people you belive them to be. Only then will you know what the right path is. We will support you whatever you choose, as we have supported expectant mothers who chose to patent in the past. In the end, you have a choice, and the only way to be at peace with that is to trust that you are doing what's absolutely best for your child. We are here for you no matter what choice you make.
@jaxxM let's save it for a hot topic post another day, and remember the purpose of the orrigial post.