Community› The Bump Message Boards› 1st Trimester
1st Trimester
New Discussion

Is it true about the placenta?!?!

nemosucksIInemosucksII member
in 1st Trimester

If it's on the left side, it's a girl - right side: boy?

Report Reply to Post

Re: Is it true about the placenta?!?!

  • nemosucksIInemosucksII member
    Only 50% - that's not too convincing......
    Report Reply
  • 24karat24karat member
    It's basically as accurate as any other OWT, "Chinese Gender Chart", or guess. You have a 50% chance of getting it right, 50% chance of getting it wrong.
    J13 May Siggy Challenge: People lacking in common sense raise my blood pressure.
    image

    imageimage
    DD 8/11 | DS1 7/13 | DS2 7/13
    Report Reply
  • Loading the player...
  • katekat8721katekat8721 member
    nemosucksII said:
    Only 50% - that's not too convincing......
    lol, those are your standard chances it's a boy or a girl anyways.

    Report Reply
  • imakeeff0rtsimakeeff0rts member
    nemosucksII said:
    Only 50% - that's not too convincing......
    Sarcasm isn't your thing, is it?
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    image
    Report Reply
  • yvanehtniojyvanehtnioj member
    image

    imageimageimage
    H e n r y  May 21, 2014

    image
    Report Reply
  • rainydayluckrainydayluck member
    Oh. This crazy lady (it?) again.

    DD1: IUGR, low AFI delivered at 36 weeks

    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers


    DD2: IUGR, low AFI delivered at 37 weeks
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers




    Report Reply
  • cyndelgracecyndelgrace member
    Sounds like someone's been trolling BUT, FYI, there IS a study regarding early placenta location being indicative of baby's sex. I'll see if I can find a link.
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickersLilypie Second Birthday tickers
    Lilypie Maternity tickers
    Report Reply
  • cyndelgracecyndelgrace member
    It's Ramzi's Method if you'd like to know more. In the particular study, it was 6 week transvaginal u/s and the results were surprisingly accurate.
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickersLilypie Second Birthday tickers
    Lilypie Maternity tickers
    Report Reply
  • RondackHikerRondackHiker member
    cyndelgrace said:

    It's Ramzi's Method if you'd like to know more. In the particular study, it was 6 week transvaginal u/s and the results were surprisingly accurate.

    Yeah, but it needs to be at six weeks and it needs to be done during the ultrasound... A photo can be flipped. Also, it's not THAT accurate. Wait till 20 weeks.


    image image
    Report Reply
  • Erica314 Erica314 member
    cyndelgrace said:
    It's Ramzi's Method if you'd like to know more. In the particular study, it was 6 week transvaginal u/s and the results were surprisingly accurate.
    There was one single "study" that went off of ultrasounds performed by one single Dr. that showed that this was accurate, and no one else has replicated these results to my knowledge.

    I can find you a single study that says just about anything you can imagine. Doesn't make it accurate!

    imageimage

    Baby #1 due June 5th, 2014

    image
    Report Reply
  • cyndelgracecyndelgrace member
    From a clinical perspective, yes, it's one study and needs to be replicated to hold true but it's significantly higher than 50% in this study and is very intriguing. Why treat OP like a fool for being intrigued by these observations?
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickersLilypie Second Birthday tickers
    Lilypie Maternity tickers
    Report Reply
  • rainydayluckrainydayluck member
    cyndelgrace said:

    From a clinical perspective, yes, it's one study and needs to be replicated to hold true but it's significantly higher than 50% in this study and is very intriguing. Why treat OP like a fool for being intrigued by these observations?

    Because OP is a fool.

    DD1: IUGR, low AFI delivered at 36 weeks

    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers


    DD2: IUGR, low AFI delivered at 37 weeks
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers




    Report Reply
  • cyndelgracecyndelgrace member

    rainydayluck said:
    From a clinical perspective, yes, it's one study and needs to be replicated to hold true but it's significantly higher than 50% in this study and is very intriguing. Why treat OP like a fool for being intrigued by these observations?
    Because OP is a fool.
    ::Looks back on OP's posts:: Well, can't argue with you on that one...
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickersLilypie Second Birthday tickers
    Lilypie Maternity tickers
    Report Reply
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"