FB WTF

ClaireOtoms · October 2013

One of my fb friends just posted a series of 5 or photos of her 6 month old baby girl. Baby is naked and wearing a string of pearls, laying on the bed. The angles are "tasetful," so there are no private bits showing.

Seriously? If you have to use the word "tasteful angles" in reference to infant photography, the photo should probably not be taken. Am I being a prude here?

babyLOLO13 · October 2013

I don't see anything wrong w/ naked baby photos as long as they aren't showing the goods. I think a cute naked bootie baby picture is adorable. Thats just me.

hartsl01 · October 2013

I guess to each their own... I've seen some cute ones where they have on a diaper cover with a tutu, and I think those are cute. However, I will NEVER post naked pictures of my baby on the interwebs.

babygiantquest · October 2013

Naked baby photos creep me out, not going to lie. Naked wrapped in a blanket? That's cute. Tastefully-posed nude? That's weird.

ClaireOtoms · October 2013

I don't know, I guess it was the string of pearls and the fact that it was on fb that got me going...something about it just seemed off. I guess it's hard to explain without sharing the photos, which is not ok.

jennlin · October 2013

6 mos might be slightly big for nekky..but not too bad...i see nothing wrong with them younger though.

maybe black out some identifying marks and let us judge? i don't think it sounds that bad.

mancila60 · October 2013

I wouldn't put naked pics on the web at all baby or not. However I see nothing wrong with a naked baby when the goods aren't shown. I also agree that 6 months may be a little too big for naked baby booty.

FB WTF

Re: FB WTF

Choose Another Board

Search Boards