Our priest just called to schedule this LO's baptism for December 1st (this ish is getting real quickly!). We're planning a 1:00 ceremony Sunday afternoon and a light reception type thing afterwards. The problem is the guest list.
Some background: my entire family is Catholic- both my mom and my dad's sides, but only a handful of the families go to Mass regularly/at all. My parents and siblings/grandparents/and one of my dad's sisters and her family. The rest of the family is kind of "Christmas and Easter Catholics" and one of the sisters and her kids haven't been to church since the youngest who is my age was in 2nd grade. (Not that it's my place to judge how much they go to church-- just an illustration that there are varying degrees of "religious-ness" --for lack of a better word-- some of them have faith beliefs but don't formally practice a religion- some of them don't practice any religion at all) DH converted to Catholicism after we got married, but his family has a similar range of "religious-ness" of various types of Christianity (his mom attends a UCC church, his sister a Methodist church, etc.) and some that don't practice a religion at all.
So I was going over the potential guest list with DH and we agreed on one that is about 24-25 people-- basically our parents and siblings, our grandparents, the priest, DH's godmother, and DH's aunt/uncle couple that we would have chosen as godparents if they were Catholic. We feel like that's the perfect size for our house for a light lunch type reception. I mentioned this to my mom over the weekend and she's insisting we need to invite my whole family-- basically everyone that typically comes to birthdays/etc. That would be a guest list of 54-55 people total-- way too many for our house to fit comfortably in the winter (We've had big parties in the summer when we can use our patios/sunroom- but in Ohio in December that's out of the question.).
I've tried to tell her that it's just too many people/baby will only be a couple weeks old/germs/house is too small/etc. I've also tried the "I'm not having a 1st birthday party with 70 people so I have to draw the line sometime/somewhere" argument-- but that didn't resolve the issue either. She's insisting we have to invite everyone and that we can use her house if ours is too small. I personally just think it's too much for an infant baptism-- and I really don't want to draw the line anywhere between those two groups since that would be sort of inviting people based on how "religious" they are-- so I'd like to keep it to the minimum family group. And I don't really want to have it at her house because LO will be more comfortable at our house and since I'll be supplying the majority of the food it's just easier to do it at our house-- and I don't want to have this argument again at his first birthday party when we only invite the 20 closest family members-- I'm trying to nip it in the bud before she perpetually uses the "our house is big enough" offer in perpetuity.
Am I being a beotch? Should I just suck it up and invite everyone and have it at her house? Any other ideas/words of wisdom?
Re: Baptism Guest List- Advice Needed (Long)
Personally, if my mother and father offered up their home in order to accommodate more people, I would graciously accept. Not sure what your EDD is but by then hopefully your LO will be a month old. If people are sick, I'd hope they'd be smart enough to utilize common sense and stay home. Finally, just because 50-some people are invited doesn't mean all will show.
#LOLFITMAMA
#LOLFITMAMA
I would ignore the level of religiousness and be equal between both sides. So if you want to invite one aunt, then I would invite all aunts.
We will invite godparents, grandparents, parents, and siblings. That is all I want to host and all that I want involved.
If someone, like your MIL wanted to host the party afterwards and lived in town, then I would let her go for it. It is hard to host a party when you will be gone before it (we had the party right after the service), so if someone else wanted to do it, I would jump at the opportunity.