Hi ladies -
I apologize for being totally "new"... I actually posted here a while ago after I had DS 2.5 yrs ago but can't figure out my old log in. Have been lurking on and off since, and got a new log in a bit ago when I realized it was fruitless to believe my old one would "come to me"
ANYWAY -
DS is an IVF baby. I have an ET tomorrow for our first (and maybe only) shot at #2.
I'm grappling with how many embryos to transfer. In all likelihood we have tomorrow and one not-so-great shot with a single frozen embryo from our first IVF. We will not do another IVF cycle (we just won't - long story you prob. don't care about really).
So I feel like transferring 2 increases the odds of one, but also is a very real possibility of twins (we transferred 2 w/DS and both stuck until I was 10w.)
I work full time (full time+ if I'm being honest) and so does DH. We are both at the top of our field and make great money. Plus I love my job (really). I have no desire to be a SAHM (again, long story/not worth it).
I come from a big family. I can't get my head around life as an "only" which is why we are taking a shot at #2. But I also don't know anyone IRL who has three LOs and still maintained a big job, happy marriage and raised good kids.
I kind of want to take the best shot and transfer 2, but CAN IT BE DONE?
Anyone here have 3 LOs and work full time (no flex, no WFH) at a job they want to work at?
Am i nuts to consider this?
I'm really having a hard time. Any opinions would be great. Tough to talk this out IRL because then people get invested in whether it will work and this is tough stuff to share when it doesn't...
TIA
Re: Any WMs with 3 LOs ... ?
It sounds like you and your DH are doing well financially, so you'll be able to hire help and life will be manageable. Get a nanny, cleaners, landscaping service, etc.
I think you should go for it, you have to think long term about what you want your family to look like.
The 1:1 time is a fear for me. I don't like the idea of being outnumbered either (LOL).
We love to travel, and Megan, you bring up a great point - it will GET expensive, fast...
But JF - I agree on the "playmate" thing. One of my friends had a baby the same day I had DS and another (oops) 13 mo. later - they're AMAZING together.
I do feel like we waited a long time to try for #2 so we kind of missed that for DS (and it makes me sad) - but we had to (DH has been traveling every other weekend, and I have my limits. LOL).
I only have one, but we went through IVF. We don't think we want to be one-n-done, although (unlike you, it seems), money is part of the decision for us. Anyway, I know what we're planning to do when we're ready for #2 is to only transfer one embryo at a time. We'll do a transfer with 1 and if that doesn't work, we'll try again, until we are out of frozen embryos. For us, we absolutely do not want three. We'd rather have one than three, and I think I'd shoot myself if I had twins. Not really, but you get my drift. I think it really comes down to thinking about two factors: how you would respond to having twins (i.e. would you rather have three than one) and whether you could do more than 1 transfer. For us, I'd rather pay more money and do multiple transfers than risk having twins.
I realize that you probably won't see this before your transfer this morning - so good luck with your decision and I hope it all goes smoothly! I know how stressful it is.
I have 3 and work FT. I do WFH one day a week but that does not solve all of the time logistics. We outsource some things: a cleaning lady 2 times a month do do a deep clean of the bathrooms and kitchen, we have a teenager mow our lawn weekly and the slow cooker is my best friend. I found the baby stage to be the most challenging - but that is the same with 1 or 3 kids. I hope all goes smoothly with your ET today!
A colleague was in a very similar situation. They had 1 IVF baby and decided to go for number 2. They transferred 2, only 1 took but the egg split. So she is pregnant with identical boys. I think her situation is rather unusual though (?).
For me the bigger issue would be not about having three kids but about having twins - which just makes for a higher risk pregnancy. But given that my pregnancies were super-uneventful in your situation I would go for it.
I have 3 and work full time. That being said, my girls are really spaced out in age- 14, 5 and 10 months. My husband works from home, so that is a major benefit. Plus, my employer is family friendly and has adjusted my hours so I can be available for the kids.
That being said, life is hectic sometimes, The house is a mess by the end of the week and we spend a lot of the weekend catching up. I do a nanny share part time for the younger girls and we pay my teen to help out an hour here and there when needed.
I would also like to add that my kids are awesome- they are polite, well adjusted and do great in school.
I love my family and I wouldn't have it any other way. I say go for it and everything will work itself out.