I'm not trying to start a discussion about politics, but this whole thing is insane.
My sister is affected by this government shutdown. She's an epidemiologist with the CDC. Makes perfect sense to furlough epidemiologists right before flu season starts, doesn't it? Oh wait, they decided that they actually DO need her to work, but they just aren't going to pay her. Because that makes PERFECT sense. She's an MD and apparently she's just going to work for free.
Anyone else affected?
A
M/c #1 - 10/30/07 - 5w3d, DS1 - born at 36w, M/c#2 - 12/7/09 - 5w, M/c #3 - 1/13/10 - 4w6d,
M/c #4 - 3/16/10 - 5w1d, DS2 - born via VBAC at 40w3d, M/c#5 - 11/5/12 - 7w2d
BFP #8 - 5/5/13- Looks like a sticky one! DS3 - born via epi-free VBAC at 39w1d
Re: NBR: Anyone affected by the government shutdown?
Bump Unofficial Glossary
I think this is just so ridiculous. I feel like this is congress' version of a hissy fit. Shutting down a government and forcing people not to be paid (when they have given themselves an exemption from the pay cut) because they are delaying something that they don't agree with is counterproductive.
Partially Complex (my blog)
Emma Kate - born 10.16.03 @ 29 weeks, weighed 1lb 13oz and 13.5" long.
TTC #3
This is our scenario also. I do worry about some of my veteran benefits if the shutdown lasts longer than a week though.
I'm a federal employee, non-esential, but with the very lucky distinction of being paid with "two year money". (I found this out on Friday). That means that Congress appropriates money to pay my group in 2yr increments, so they don't need to appropriate new money this year for me to continue being paid. I'm grateful that my military coworkers will continue being paid as well.
I know this isn't supposed to be a political discussion, but I'm going to chime in with all of you other frusterated people. I understand that the Tea Party members don't like the ACA. I'm not crazy about it myself. (It has good parts, but major flaws too, imo). But we have a process here. The ACA was 1. passed by the senate 2. ratified by the house 3. signed into law by the president and 4. upheld by the supreme court. There have been numerous attempts to repeal it, and they have failed. Hijacking the entire federal government because you don't like the rules of the game is not statemanship. It's immature and reckless and makes you look really bad.
Miscarriage 3/15 at 10 weeks
BFP 7/23/15 EDD 4/3/16
__________________________________________________________
DS1 born 08.02.11
DS2 born 12.05.13
**********************************************************************************************************************
Diagnosed with PCOS June 2010, TTC#1 since May 2012
Cycle#1-3 Clomid 50mg + TI= No response
Cycle#4-5 Clomid 150mg + Metformin 1000mg + TI= BFN, but finally ovulation!!!
Cycle #6 Clomid 150mg + Metformin 1500mg + IUI(4/15)= BFP!!! EDD 01/06/2014 <br>
Stella Margaret arrived on December 21, 2013!
Due Date 11/10/16
I coach a HS team of 50 kids that uses a National Parks site in DC to train at, which is now baracaded and locked. Trying to make other arrangements for them so their season isn't cancelled has been incredibly hectic and frustrating.
I know it's small peanuts compared to what else is going on and how people have been affected, it's just hard to see kids who have no voice in what's happening affected by this.
Freebies for those furloughed: https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Businesses-Offer-Freebies-to-Furloughed-Federal-Workers-225942371.html
J14's January Signature Challenge: Favorite Post-Delivery Indulgence
I don't think any one political party is a "saving grace" - one side getting their way all the time does not a functioning democracy make. Legitimate government NEEDS healthy debate and combat within the confines of its chosen institutional system. But what separates us from failed states is the fact that we have a system at all - without the system, things fall apart...in ways that are unpredictable and not conducive to a functioning nation / economy.
Being a minority like the Tea Party in a representative government is a very frustrating position, I don't doubt it, but the Tea Party didn't win the last election. In our system, it means your options are limited - you can only achieve your policy goals by working with more moderate members of your own party, or the other side. Except the Tea Party has decided they don't want to work with moderates or majority. They want their own way, and they are willing to subvert the system and shut down the government for 100% of the population to satisfy the demands of the minority who represent their constituents. I can understand why people are angry at the Tea Party in this instance, can't you?
__________________________________________________________
DS1 born 08.02.11
DS2 born 12.05.13
But the problem with that argument is, the government DID function as it should. A law was passed in accordance with our legislative process. The Supreme Court has confirmed said law is constitutional. The chance to make changes to that law and come to the table is supposed to happen during the legislative process, not after the fact.
Why should a party come to the table at this point to renegotiate something it has already negotiated and passed through proper channels, and that a majority of the country, based on our most recent election results, supports? If this is the new process, get ready for nothing to get done, ever - the legislative process will become unending, because if a party doesn't get its way, it will be able to force a shut down and bring everyone back to the table...we'll never be able to consider legislation "complete". It's actually the ultimate form of control by special interests, if you think about it, and it's scary.
__________________________________________________________
DS1 born 08.02.11
DS2 born 12.05.13
I'm not arguing the point you are both making. I fully understand that the tea party is grandstanding and throwing a hissy fit. So YES, today, you may blame the tea party for the shut down. I don't personally feel that way (even though I do not agree with the shut down) because I don't support the ACA, but that is not my argument. My argument is that before the ACA got voted through both the Senate and the House and put into place as constitutional, the issues that BOTH sides still to this day have with certain aspects of the ACA should have been worked out, before it was ever even considered to be put through as a law. My argument is the current state of the government (being driven by political interest groups, voting on issues for the sake of poll standings, ect) is the bigger idea of what's wrong with today's government - which is turn why stupid grandstanding and government shut downs are happening.
@MarBee1214
My in-laws are in this city and my mother-in-law will be out of work. She works on base and her income there is her only income. We lost my father-in-law this year and her work has literally been the only thing keeping her sane and busy. We are actually leaving tomorrow to go visit, which was preplanned before this fiasco, so hopefully with us being there she'll be able to get through her days.
__________________________________________________________________________
Oh I think it's crap they expect people to work but they won't pay them. Seriously what is wrong with our government these days??