While I'm not a fan, my brother is a III and we actually call him by his middle name. (My mother wasn't a fan either, but they had some secret deal they won't tell anyone).
I know a lot of people who name their sons after dad but call them something else.
I don't care for Jr.'s, but that doesn't mean you can't use your husband's name as inspiration. Perhaps a derivative or international version of your husband's name (for example Collin is an Irish derivative of Nicholas, or Jackson for a son of John). Or use his name for a middle name.
I really wanted to name my third son after my husband Josh. We settled on JJ: Jensen Joshua. (Jensen actually means John's son but we couldn't find anything for Joshua's son.)
My husband is a II and he absolutely hates it. He hates his father and the fact that they have the same name is just a sore spot. Luckily, I guess we won't be having an arguement over having a III!
My oldest has my husbands initials and middle name i m not into the whole junior thing either My second has my dads first name as his middle name so not to bad if you do something like that
My father's name is Mark Joseph and my brother is Joseph Mark . It isn't a jr but still special.
My older sister did the same with both of her sons, but used the grandfather's names flipped. I think it's a great way of keeping the names and a sentimental touch.
BFP #1 11/19/12 EDD: 7/25/13 Natural MC on 12/31/12 at 10w4d
BFP#2 3/1/13 EDD: 11/5/13 Missed MC 4/9/13 at 10w D&C 4/11/13 Baby #2 diagnosed with Trisomy 16. Diagnosed Hetero MTHFR.
BFP#3 8/5/13 EDD: 4/13/14 Team Green Turned Team Blue! Our rainbow baby, Griffin R arrived via c-section (breech since 20w) on 4/11/14.
I personally hate it. I hate when kids have the same first name as another family member (even extended family). It gets confusing and you have to end up calling them big John or little John. I also think it's dumb to name someone something with the intention of calling them something else. If you plan on calling them by their middle name then just name them that!! It causes confusion when you are always having to correct people, "My name is John, but I go by Andrew".
Everyone should get their own identity. DS has the same middle name and initials as DH, but he has his own first name.
My mom named my brother after my dad (but used II instead of Jr.) against her better judgment. She said my dads mom fussed about it bc she told her all people deserve their own name. To this day, she regrets it.
If LO is a boy, we'll give him a first name with the same first initial as DH's and then DH's middle name as his middle name. I like the idea of using family names for middle names and giving them their own individual first names. That way they can be their own person, but still have some family heritage in there too
With the possible exception of the equator, everything begins somewhere. - C.S.Lewis
My husband's name and my FIL is George. I wanted to name DS something to go with his dad but not the George name again. So since my DH's middle name is Osvaldo we decided on Aldo for my DS. We want another DD this time around and he teaming wants to use my middle name as either her middle or first (Anneth) but I'm not feeling it. Lol.
I think it can be nice for the son to carry his dad's name or some variation thereof (so many great ideas on here!). We have a good friend who is a jr. who has actually had many headaches with his credit report because they get his mixed up with his father's, and his father has terrible credit. While that specific scenario may not be an issue for everyone, keep in mind that the son having the same name as his father may be confusing for personal relationships and in more removed professional settings.
My husband and his father have the same first name, but different middle names. If we have a son, he's said he does not want to use the same first name again, but maybe use it as a middle name. I'm fine with whatever he decides :-)
My dad is a jr and I've seen him deal with so many headaches over the years that I never wanted my son to have the same name as my husband. With that being said, my husband wants nothing more in the world than to have a jr. Because I've been so adamantly against it for so many years, this is a real battle between my husband and me. I've always wanted a son so I've got lots of names in my repertoire. DH is being a total ASS about it!!!!! (Or at least in my pregnant mind he is) And it makes me so angry that we haven't discussed names with this pregnancy. Aaaaahhh! No jr!!!
I don't care for this tradition personally, but if it's something you and YH like, there's no reason not to. It's a pretty well-established tradition going back centuries. If it was soooo confusing, people would have stopped using it a long time ago. Personally, I just think people should get their own names. Other people love using family names, and some cultures insist on it. It's entirely up to you.
My sis named her son after her hubby who is a Jr and now regrets it because my family has a tradition of naming each child/grandchild/great-grand with the beginning Letter being L. He is an S and the only one out of maybe 20 of us with a S name and not a L. If my hubby wanted a jr it would've been a struggle for me because I love our tradition.
I appreciate all of the thoughts and advice! I will say, however, on the note of individuality- It seems everyone is so obsessed with uniqueness an individuality and trying to find the perfectly unique name that nobody else has that it seems like the last unique thing today is to give your child a traditional name that reminds them of family values and where they came from. I don't know if I think that a name decides whether or not someone is their own person. Isn't someone their own person no matter what? I had 6 other Lauren's on my cheerleading team and nobody had to remind me that I'm "my own person." Just a thought! Like I said, I really appreciate all of the respectful opinions!
It can be a nice idea, but I think it can also get out of hand if you have a large family with the same names repeating a lot or several generations with the same name. That said, we're planning to use a variation of DH's middle name as baby's first name if we have a boy. He'll be named after DH, but still have his own unique name too.
We're jewish and you only name someone after the deceased, no one living. But even if that wasnt the case i think i wouldnt. Everyone needs their own identity. They are going to be compared to their parents/siblings enough as it is.
I don't totally love the idea, but my husband comes from a long line of the same name that I don't intend to break. My husband is the only one that goes by the middle name, though.
Re: Naming son after DH
I know a lot of people who name their sons after dad but call them something else.
Edit: I can't spell
I really wanted to name my third son after my husband Josh. We settled on JJ: Jensen Joshua. (Jensen actually means John's son but we couldn't find anything for Joshua's son.)
The whole concept of naming after the father or anyone else seems to take a away a sense of identity in my opinion.
BFP #1 11/19/12 EDD: 7/25/13 Natural MC on 12/31/12 at 10w4d
BFP#2 3/1/13 EDD: 11/5/13 Missed MC 4/9/13 at 10w D&C 4/11/13
Baby #2 diagnosed with Trisomy 16. Diagnosed Hetero MTHFR.
BFP#3 8/5/13 EDD: 4/13/14 Team Green Turned Team Blue! Our rainbow baby, Griffin R arrived via c-section (breech since 20w) on 4/11/14.
.
~~Everyone Always Welcome~~
Everyone should get their own identity. DS has the same middle name and initials as DH, but he has his own first name.
ETA: spelling.
With the possible exception of the equator, everything begins somewhere. - C.S.Lewis