My daughter is a former micropreemie who has been in EI since NICU discharge with varying amounts of services. Right now she gets weekly PT and monthly speech. We are coming up on a review in a few weeks and depending on what services and quantity they recommend I may consider just transitioning to private services. Im pretty sure they are going to recommend continuing PT but maybe on a reduced schedule, but Im really not sure what they are going to say about speech or an educator. That said, if we are only looking at PT once a week or once every 2 weeks Id like to go to private therapies which are covered under our insurance and avoid the $250 monthly family fee that our state charges for EI.
I am concerned about what that might mean for school system transition though. Is this a shortsighted decision if it is only going to cause problems in a year when she is eligible through the school system? Would I need to re-enroll in EI to get an IEP at age 3?
Re: EI to school system transition
I would probably talk to your team about the transition process and what role they will play in it. If they're as much of a support as my ei experience was, it would most definitely be worth keeping. If they don't do a whole lot, I would look into getting an advocate to help you through the process and do private therapy instead.
But, I agree with pp before making the switch be absolutely sure of the covered services of your policy, they can get tricky and often insurance companies don't even know what their own damn coverages are. Our OT gets a denial letter every month, and every month they have to call and explain over again, and every month it gets approved. But the process is the same month after month after month.
The other thing to consider is not only making sure you find a therapist who will fit your needs therapeutically, but who also takes your insurance and who also has openings. In my, fairly major metro area that was a harder task than I thought it should have been.
IME, EI didn't bring a ton to the table with regards to the transition to the school system. She provided me the paperwork to fill out and attended the first meeting to give the team background information and her final report. Which was a nice to have but totally not necessary. The school does all of their own evaluations anyway, and often the criteria for services is going to be different than what you were offered in EI.
www.virginiakkent.blogspot.com
As others have said, it just depends. For DS, keeping EI (we also did private PT/OT in addition) was the difference between him qualifying for SN preschool (or an itinerant teacher) and not. I am certain that if he had been in just private PT he wouldn't have qualified, but (where we are), his EI team was able to do his transition evaluations and they were more cautious than (I believe) most would have been.
We had discussed it with them - he would clearly qualify for gross motor, but was iffy on adaptive. The issue was that *technically* at 2 yrs 9 mo at his evaluation, he wouldn't qualify at 1.5 dev behind, by a little. But they (and we) knew that he was highly unlikely to make the same amount of progress a typical kid would in the next 6-9 months so he *would* qualify by 3.5/4 since the expectations are higher. Instead of changing his placement in 6 months and having to fight for reevaluation, being very strict on the evaluation ensured he got the services he really needed from the beginning.
Hopefully by the time V hits 3 you no longer need services, but I would definitely at least understand the process for transitioning to school services and plan to get her reassessed in time for her to do 2 years of developmental preschool if needed. I know too many preemies who have a honeymoon period between 1.5-4ish when they "catch-up" for the most part, but then struggle when they get to K so I think it is a good idea to at least know the process and make sure you keep a close eye on her development.
www.virginiakkent.blogspot.com