I was just in the botanical gardens, and a woman came up to me and asked if she could take a photo of LO. I said yes, and she did and that was that.
Then I wondered whether I should have been more cautious/concerned or something. It's a big and famous botanical gardens, gets loads of foreign tourists, this was a foreigner (couldn't place her accent) and she was maybe my mother's sort of age. I didn't think anything of it at the time, but then got to wondering why a woman would take a photo of a strange baby playing in a sand pit. Apart from the fact that LO is desperately cute.
On another note, when we first got there, there were some geese with babies. Someone got too close, so the geese started quacking. LO sat there and quacked back at them. Some Asian tourists walked past and started quacking at LO. It was all very funny.
Re: WWYD? A stranger in the park taking photos of LO
Photography is my hobby, and I often see beautiful shots I'd love to take of other people -- especially children -- interacting in public spaces. I often opt not to take them for fear of upsetting someone or looking like a total creeper, even though I am definitely not. Being a woman helps -- A lot of my male friends who enjoy journalism-style photography don't even bother most of the time because men are judged as perverts immediately in this context.
I completely understand why this would make parents edgy, but I don't think your first instinct should be that this person has an ulterior or malicious motive. Still, it is well within your rights to ask about the intended purpose of the photo or to say no to her question.
I made rachelmichelle1 my bitch.
If you felt comfortable with her doing it, I am sure everything was fine and she wasn't a creeper. I truly believe in trusting your gut feeling!
After 7 years of no ovulation...
BFP#1 10/24/11 ~ EDD 6/29/12 ~ Natural m/c 11/2/11
BFP#2 2/3/12 ~ Alice born 9/26/12