Community› The Bump Message Boards› Multiples
Multiples
New Discussion
Options

Adjusted age vs real

ceechieceechie member
in Multiples
Ok, I'm so confused! Do you go by your twins adjusted age, how many weeks they'd be if went to term, or real age when looking at developmental milestones? My twins were born at 37 weeks and are now 5 weeks old (born 6/23). So, when calculating when they should smile or roll over, what age do I follow?
Hopefully this isn't a goofy question! My previous pregnancies went over due, 41 weeks, and it felt like those babies did things really early!
Report Reply to Post

Re: Adjusted age vs real

  • Options
    Missa_gMissa_g member
    37w is technically FT so you don't adjust. However, all kids develop differently and those milestone charts are just a guideline not set in stone.
    Lilypie Premature Baby tickers
    Married 9/22/07, began TTC 8/10
    Diagnosed with DOR, LP defect, mild endometriosis and cysts
    BFP #1 EDD 9/10/11, natural miscarriage at 6w
    BFP #2 Medicated cycle, twin boys born 4/4/12 at 29w4d
    BFP #3 EDD 8/8/14, D&C for missed miscarriage at 8w, baby boy with triploidy
    BFP #4 June 2014 CP
    Report Reply
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"