I'm just curious if anyone else has been told they will not go full term? My dr told me today because of my age they will not let me go to 40 weeks. Unless something goes wrong and they need to do it sooner, they will induce me at 39 weeks. I guess with AMA there is a greater risk of stillbirth if you carry full term. I hadn't known that until my last ultrasound. Anyway, I guess I can chuck my November 25 due date now and plan on meeting my daughter sometime around November 18 instead. Feels kinda strange. I know I could go into labor early naturally anyway, but it's an odd feeling knowing you'll be induced before your due date. One more twist in the AMA adventure!
Me:41, DH:41 Positive for MTHFR mutations- one copy C677T, one copy A1298C. One daughter born on Thanksgiving in 2013. Six losses.
Re: Full term?
BFP #1 5/27/12- m/c 7/9/12 @ 10w2d (cytotec induced @11w).
Fibroids, Hashimoto's Hypothyroidism
BFP #2 11/18/12 EDD 7/27/13
Yes, I was told it was simply because of the risks associated with my age. I'm 40.
This for me, too.
TTC 10/11. IUI 2/12. BFP 3/8/12. 4/26/12 missed mc. RE consult 5/17/12. IVF #1 ER 7/13/12 53R, 41M ICSIed, 32F, 8 5d, 6 6d blasts - all PGD/frozen. PGD results 1 normal M and 1 normal F, 1 maybe M. FET 9/6, transferred 1 F embie. Beta 9/15 BFN. FET#2 planned for 11/2012 put off until 2013. Surprise BFP 11/21/12!! My son was born on 7/24/13!
I haven't heard of them inducing early just because of age. I'd push back on that if it were me.
They are taking my little guy at 36 weeks because they can't risk me going into labor on my own, but that's because I have uterus that's been chopped up and they are worried about rupture. Nothing to do with age.
BFP#1 1/31/12, EDD 10/6/12 Harrison Gray born sleeping @ 18w6d. You changed our lives little guy.
BFP#2 EDD 10/29/13, C/P 2/25/13, Bye little Ish, we barely got to know you.
BFP#3 EDD 12/21/13, Baby Boots born 11/23/13 My rainbow baby!
January PAL Siggy Challenge: Good Advice
I have an induction scheduled for 39w1d. My OB does not want be going past 40w mostly b/c of age.
I went into spontaneous labor with my 1st at 38w2d, and I was starting to dilate at my 36w appt last Monday, so I may not make it to 39 weeks anyway. I'm currently getting weekly biophysical profile u/s to check on baby, placenta, and fluid levels and they have always looked good. I could probably talk my OB into letting me go closer to 40w if I wanted it....and given the fact I know my body can labor just fine on it's own, I would rather wait if my cervix wasn't favorable for an induction.
It is a little strange knowing your baby's potential birthdate so far in advance.
DD born 12.21.09, conceived w/ injects and IUI
TTC#2 since Nov 2011
BFP 2.6.12 m/c 6w5d | BFP 5.25.12 c/p
-Back to the RE-
3 medicated IUIs, all BFN
-Taking a break from treatment-
BFP 11.20.12 ~ EDD 7.28.13
My Chart
Same for me. I'm 40 and my OB said she will start offering me induction at 41 weeks. I asked why. She said risk of stil birth goes up in 41 to 42 week period. I've only just started to look at the actual statistics (increase of 1:2000 to 2:2000) in week 40-41 versus 41-42. I only read the news reports and haven't read the published articles yet. I don't know how well they controlled for factors that could have caused the still birth. So it is hard for me to believe it is AMA alone. Maybe it is other health characteristics associated with AMA.
Same for me. I'm 40 and my OB said she will start offering me induction at 41 weeks. I asked why. She said risk of stil birth goes up in 41 to 42 week period. I've only just started to look at the actual statistics (increase of 1:2000 to 2:2000) in week 40-41 versus 41-42. I only read the news reports and haven't read the published articles yet. I don't know how well they controlled for factors that could have caused the still birth. So it is hard for me to believe it is AMA alone. Maybe it is other health characteristics associated with AMA.
This is the only reference I found, but I haven't read the source document.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-21277369
Talk about inducing just came up at my OB appt last week. However, it was the issue of inducing at 41 weeks. 75% of FTMs delivery after 40 weeks. So I am not keen on inducing at 41 weeks. I'd prefer to wait to 42 unless there is truly Grade A evidence about the increased risk of still birth.
Over-40 parents...what we lack in vigor, we make up for with cunning.
bullshiz.
unless you have a medical history that indicates a reason for this, inducing carries it's own set of risks for both mom and baby.
I would want a detailed u/s (with Doppler flow to the placenta examined), NST and a biophysical profile of the baby, before considering induction.
I went to nearly 41 weeks w my son (not induced) and I was 35 years old. that being risky was never mentioned.
DS born via unplanned C-section at 40w6d
I am 35 but can honestly say even if I was a bit older I would still refuse an induction. To me the negatives associated with inductions outweigh an induction based on age alone. They can do additional testing and monitoring and I would much rather choose that option. My doctor has not mentioned anything regarding induction but I plan on making it very clear that I don't want pitocin or any of the synthetic drugs in my system either before, during, or after delivery. It is probably one of my most required items along with delayed cord clamping.
https://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/News_Room/News_Releases/2013/Study_Finds_Adverse_Effects_of_Pitocin_in_Newborns
https://www.sicklycat.com/2012/05/24/21-reasons-to-say-no-to-pitocin-according-to-manufacturer/