Anyone heard of this before? Basically, the husband spanks the wife or gives her timeouts or takes away phone, tv, or other privileges when she breaks a rule.
It's an excuse for men to be physically/verbally/emotionally abusive and get away with it. I fail to see how any woman with any amount of self worth would allow their husband to treat them that way.
There was a bumpie a while back who said she and her husband did this. I can't remember what board, it was several years ago. She used to get flamed up the ying yang.
I assume that it's a cover for sexual fetishes on the parts of both members, whether or not they want to admit that.
That is EXACTLY where my mind went! I had to go poke around the site because it just seems so crazy , it's just S&M being covered by some crazy nutty religion name. I mean they are sexually repressed and can't say "hey I want you to spank me" or vise versa so they are just covering with the "Jesus told me I need to be control so its ok I have these desires". I actually hope its the case for most because at least then they are secretly happy about the "punishment" I guess.
The other choice is just sad, like other poster said, could be an excuse for controlling abuse.
I bet it's a combination of both abuse and sexual fetishes, depending on the couple. My favorite line is "Many of them report feeling extremely calm and relaxed after being disciplined, and believe it is an expression of their husband caring about them and their marriage, enough to help them modify their behaviour,"
enough to help them modify their behavior....seriously??
Ugh this is gross. I read 50 shades. I wouldn't compare the two after skimming their "rules". In 50 shades, the spanking was very sexual [obviously] this is just trying to make abuse ok. I get a pit in my stomach thinking that women offer themselves up for this type of thing. Yes, gross.
Re: Christian Domestic Discipline
I agree.
This, lol.
That is EXACTLY where my mind went! I had to go poke around the site because it just seems so crazy , it's just S&M being covered by some crazy nutty religion name. I mean they are sexually repressed and can't say "hey I want you to spank me" or vise versa so they are just covering with the "Jesus told me I need to be control so its ok I have these desires". I actually hope its the case for most because at least then they are secretly happy about the "punishment" I guess.
The other choice is just sad, like other poster said, could be an excuse for controlling abuse.
I guess as long as both parties "consent" to this so-called Christian Domestic Discipline, then sure, go for it.
S&M.
I bet it's a combination of both abuse and sexual fetishes, depending on the couple. My favorite line is "Many of them report feeling extremely calm and relaxed after being disciplined, and believe it is an expression of their husband caring about them and their marriage, enough to help them modify their behaviour,"
enough to help them modify their behavior....seriously??
I would do it if I could be the dominant one.
*My Blog*
10/50 Read
my read shelf:
Ugh this is gross. I read 50 shades. I wouldn't compare the two after skimming their "rules". In 50 shades, the spanking was very sexual [obviously] this is just trying to make abuse ok. I get a pit in my stomach thinking that women offer themselves up for this type of thing. Yes, gross.
SAHM to 4 kiddos... K (5/05), N (4/09), C (11/10) and Baby A 1/13/14