Lurker: I took a friend of mine to the WIC office today. While I was waiting, I read the posters on the wall. One of the posters said that cosleeeping increases SIDS by 40 times. It went on to liken cosleeping to child abuse and said that you should call the child abuse hotline to report these activities. Needless to say I was upset at reading this. My friend cosleeps with her 11 month old and I plan to cosleep with my baby.
Re: WIC Office
The risks are great when done under unsafe circumstances, but to liken cosleeping/bedsharing to child abuse as a rule? That is taking it way too far. Are we going to start calling CPS on people who do BLW as a rule because some people might not be smart about it and give their kids things they might choke on?
Not cool, WIC Office. Advising against it is one thing, but calling it abuse is over the top and frankly, inaccurate.
I guess I can understand that. It was mainly that fact that cosleeping was likened to child abuse. I know I live in the south where the majority of people think that cosleeping is wrong. But, I don't believe it to be, when done correctly.
I would rather people not cosleep at all than do it the wrong way. I don't think this poster was wrong at all given the location. A poster stating the ways to do it right/don't cosleep if you meet these conditions would take up a whole lotta room.
As someone currently receiving state assistance (aka part of a "specific demographic") and as someone also practicing safe bed-sharing, I couldn't disagree more. A poster advising against bedsharing in the WIC office is understandable. Calling bedsharing child abuse under your "wide net" strategy is not only over the top but downright offensive and wrong.
It's a tragedy when babies die because of bad choices or lack of information on the parents' part. But I would hate to have CPS get involved in my relationship with my LO because some poster at the WIC office incorrectly labeled my sleeping arrangements as child abuse.
DS: 11/1/2010 DD: 8/9/2012 #3: 4/2019
I thought of taking a pic with my phone, but they had signs saying "NO CELLPHONES". I would hate to be targeted by someone just for cosleeping especially since I have researched and plan to do it safely.
"Under those conditions it's a great thing. However, a large portion of the population they are dealing with at WIC likely does not meet those conditions and it is safer for them not to cosleep"
Um....what?!?
Oh. That's not judgey or offensive at all.
I don't get it. I don't understand what WIC has to do with not being able to safely cosleep.
The more I think about it, the more I think the poster is out of line, even if it didn't call co-sleeping abuse.
The fact is, people are going to do it anyway. It would be better to educate them on how to do it safely than to tell them not to. People don't tend to heed absolutes like that.