My plan is not to have an IV while giving birth in a hospital. Hoping I don't get a hard time on this from the staff. I am plenty hydrated with water daily and am planning to pack coconut water bottles for the big day of labor. Anyone else not have an IV in a hospital setting? Thx!
Re: No IV in hospital
My provider said it would be fine so long as it wasn't difficult to place a heplock quickly if there was an emergent situation. The hospital will defer to her judgement. (She asked me if I had any issues with needles and looked at my veins.)
...in her opinion hating needles is a good reason to get a heplock setup early. But the way I look at it, I am already sparing 30 minutes by being in the hospital as opposed to being at home - surely they can setup an IV quickly (in anyone) if they have to.
I plan to labor at home as long as possible, so maybe by the time I get there, it will be a non-issue.
I would prefer no IV or Hep-lock, but I'm not going to fight a battle if they hassle me about it. I plan to talk to my OB about it in advance.
I don't have a problem with needles, but I have heard of baby getting "bloated" if mom is pumped with fluids and then when baby loses weight initially, Dr. can push for formula supplementation even though extra weight is because of fluids. It will also be harder for me to "cave" and take pain medication if I don't have an IV in.
Hospital policy for me was a hep lock, and despite hating needles I consented because it wasn't a battle I cared to fight. My care providers (an OB the first time, midwife the second) both wanted me to have it as well.
I did not have an IV at all for my first labor, but that is how they administered pitocin post-delivery to help shrink my uterus. Second time, I labored most of the time without an IV, but when we figured out baby was breech, they required a bag of fluids in case I ended up needing anesthesia for a c/s. I was also given pit afterwards.
My husband is mandating a saline lock. I had gotten really sick over New Year's and ended up needing IV fluids and they had a hell of a time getting the IV started because I was so dehydrated. While I am planning on drinking and not needing IV fluids or anything else, it makes more sense for them to set it up while I am calm and hydrated than when I'm stressed and not feeling well.
Also, we just found out I'm GBS+ which means I will need IV antibiotics every 4 hours while in active labor or once the water breaks. So I'll need a lock set up anyway.
I see it as a precaution, like a seatbelt, not something that is going to make me more likely to get meds.
***Twin fraternal girls born at 35w6d in 12/2008***
I had neither a hep lock nor an IV for my hospital birth.
I also arrived 10 cm dilated and ready to go. If your goal is to avoid an IV, stay home as long as you can.
I will also say that you may need to be flexible. Some women are pukers in labour and actually need the fluids (I was not and easily drank 3-4 L while pushing). If you're GBS+, you may need antibiotics.
Natural Birth Board FAQs
Cloth Diaper Review Sheet
I did not have an IV but I did allow a hep-lock in the event that there was an emergency. It was not a problem. They cut the end off of a rubber glove and covered it so that I could labor in the shower.
Toward the end of my (long) labor, my midwife did comment on my needing to hydrate myself more in order to avoid an IV, so I just chowed down on a few cups of ice and had a few sips of juice and it was fine.