Parenting

Coworker and forgery?

Not sure how to proceed. Our small office of 15 people was asked by the receptionist to contribute to the three children of coworkers that are graduating this year.

. I am PT, and I don't know these kids, but I understand office politics to know that I needed to pay up. I know their parents and was happy to give the money because as an adult, that's just what you do.

The receptionist had three graduation cards that she sent around to sign, and said she had three envelopes, one for each kid, and that the company would match whatever was given.

I overheard receptionist talking to accounting lady that three of us had not given our money yet graduation is a month away, so I wrote out three separate checks, one for each graduate, written out to each kid.

I looked on my online banking today, and receptionist had signed each kid's name and her name and cashed the checks to supposedly go into the communal pot of cash! I was livid. I went to her and told her that I wrote the checks to them because I wanted them to know how much money came from me. She mumbled something about "we'll get it worked out."

Apparently she used to work at the bank and they just let her do that when she explained what she was doing. I did tell several friends at work and they couldn't believe it. Maybe I was wrong to do separate checks, but regardless I don't think she should have cashed them without asking the kids' permission.

What does Parenting think? My boss wasn't in the office today. I don't want to start a war, but I want her to know what she did was wrong. It's like she's oblivious. She also takes money from clients when they come in to pay. It makes me wonder what else she has done.

Re: Coworker and forgery?

  • The bank tellers should be fired. The employee should be fired. That's fraud
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Loading the player...
  • Andplusalso these things should not e mandatory
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagekiraliz2:
    Wait, they were made out to someone else and the bank let her cash them into her account?

    Call the bank and demand an explanation. Not ok.


    This.


    image image
  • imageRondackHiker:
    imagekiraliz2:
    Wait, they were made out to someone else and the bank let her cash them into her account?

    Call the bank and demand an explanation. Not ok.


    This.


    Yes, the bank let her cash them for cash. As I read this all typed out it sounds even worse! Glad I'm not just making this big in my head.
  • A teller that did that for someone at my bank would be fired.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • The whole scene is so very wrong.

    People should get fired over this.  Non-negotiable.

    Also, your company should stop expecting its employees to give cash gifts to children of coworkers.  Very bad practice.

    promised myself I'd retire when I turned gold, and yet here I am
  • imageSpooko:
    I'm super small town and there's no way they'd even allow that here, despite knowing everyone. That's ridiculous and I'd pursue it.


    Yeah, super small here too. I'd hate to see anyone get fired, because she would throw my name all over town. I just can't let it go though.
  • imagepeanutrach1:
    Fraud. You need to go to the bank and tell them what happened. Also tell your boss. The teller and her shld be fired.

    At my old job we had someone in accounting who would organized stuff like that and then pocket the money. Turned put she also did some worse stuff and my work fired her and pressed crimal charges. I would not be surprised if your coworker was also into some other shady stuff if she handles money regularly.


    Do I go to my bank? Or the bank where my work makes deposits? I am not certain where she did this. I'm scared y'all!
  • Start with your bank.
    promised myself I'd retire when I turned gold, and yet here I am
  • imageridesbuttons:
    Start with your bank.

    This. You'll need copies of the checks with the forged endorsements.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • This content has been removed.
  • imageHilarityEnsued:
    So she obviously shouldn't hav cashed the checks into her account, but honestly you shouldn't have written out individual checks to the kids in the first place. I was supposed to be a present from the company. If you know enough about office politics to know that you had to pay up, you should have understood that the card want going to be signed:happy Graduation! Judy gave 20, Marcia gave 45, Jack gave 30. Dd you think that they were not going to include your name in the card? nbsp;Either you should have sent those checks separately from the "company gift" or given the money to the Admin or whoever is handling it knowing that the intention was not the give the recipients an envelope full of checks so everyone could get their individual glory. nbsp;


    I completely agree, but I don't think that's the biggest issue at hand
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageHilarityEnsued:

    While this specific incidence is definitely fraud and forgery, you can endorse a check made out to you over to another person for them to deposit. So if the kid in question singed the check over to the admin,the admin could deposit it. I have done this a million times (obviously with actual permission, not forgery).

    OP there is a strong chance you will lose your job if you make a huge war out of this.  I know I am in the minority with this but I don't think you acted right to start with.  None of that excuses forgery or fraud, but I don't know if I would be sounding a million alarms over this.  

    Are you serious, Clark? 
  • She can go to her bank and see copies of the checks. If the kids signed, which is incredibly unlikely, it's done.

    But, tellers that go cashing things willy billy need to go
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageHilarityEnsued:

    While this specific incidence is definitely fraud and forgery, you can endorse a check made out to you over to another person for them to deposit. So if the kid in question singed the check over to the admin,the admin could deposit it. I have done this a million times (obviously with actual permission, not forgery).

    OP there is a strong chance you will lose your job if you make a huge war out of this.  I know I am in the minority with this but I don't think you acted right to start with.  None of that excuses forgery or fraud, but I don't know if I would be sounding a million alarms over this.  

    I was with Robin on your first post - that you were right but that wasn't the issue really needing to be dealt with.  But this?  This is off base.  You know damn well that those kids weren't given the checks and signed them over to the company worker.  Obviously it's ok to sign a check of YOURS over to whomever you choose and that's not at all what happened here.  I also want to know how in the world you think the OP could lose her job over this.  IMO, the worst that will happen is that the company does nothing to the shady worker and OP has to live the rest of her days getting the side eye from anyone who thinks she overreacted.  Personally, I think she is reacting appropriately. 

    Formerly known as elmoali :)

    image
  • imagerobinsokj:
    The bank tellers should be fired. The employee should be fired. That's fraud

    THIS. I used to be a bank teller, and this is definitely grounds for immediate termination. Plus, the lady is also breaking the law by forging your signature on the checks, I believe. That is shaaaaaaady.

     

    The VERY NICE thing to do would be ask her to pay you the money back, re-issue checks to the graduates, and that way no one would get hurt and your money would be treated the way you wanted it to. However......you could definitely just cut to the chase and pursue action against both the bank and her.

    daughter born June 2011 via C-Section, son born November 2012 via VBAC
  • imageHilarityEnsued:
    imagekiraliz2:
    imageHilarityEnsued:

    So she obviously shouldn't hav cashed the checks into her account, but honestly you shouldn't have written out individual checks to the kids in the first place. I was supposed to be a present from the company. If you know enough about office politics to know that you had to pay up, you should have understood that the card want going to be signed:

    happy Graduation! Judy gave $20, Marcia gave $45, Jack gave $30.

    Dd you think that they were not going to include your name in the card?  Either you should have sent those checks separately from the "company gift" or given the money to the Admin or whoever is handling it knowing that the intention was not the give the recipients an envelope full of checks so everyone could get their individual glory.

    Is that normal? I would not have known that's how it went.

    But also. I wouldn't have thrown in on something like that, I would have sent a card directly. I'm contrary like that.

    no it is not normal at all. I would be signed "happy graduation from ABC Company". And no one would get pointed out for giving any specific amount.  

    Hence my original comment about not sending individual checks. It was like the OP was trying to be a deliberate pain in the rear.

    Obviously none of this is really pertinent to the fraud issue.  



    We had all already signed the cards. I honestly thought she would just put my check in the card with the other cash. The reason I did the checks in the first place is because I wanted the kids to have a record of what came from me, in case some WAS skimmed off the top. I know, this sounds stupid now. if I had it to do over, I would have politely told her that I was giving the gifts on my own, and stayed out of it. I'm a wuss and probably won't call the bank. I am going to quietly mention it to my boss, and then the ball is in his court.
  • imageanchalmasako:

    imagerobinsokj:
    The bank tellers should be fired. The employee should be fired. That's fraud

    THIS. I used to be a bank teller, and this is definitely grounds for immediate termination. Plus, the lady is also breaking the law by forging your signature on the checks, I believe. That is shaaaaaaady.

     

    The VERY NICE thing to do would be ask her to pay you the money back, re-issue checks to the graduates, and that way no one would get hurt and your money would be treated the way you wanted it to. However......you could definitely just cut to the chase and pursue action against both the bank and her.



    This is a great idea.
  • imageBateaulover:
    imageanchalmasako:

    imagerobinsokj:
    The bank tellers should be fired. The employee should be fired. That's fraud

    THIS. I used to be a bank teller, and this is definitely grounds for immediate termination. Plus, the lady is also breaking the law by forging your signature on the checks, I believe. That is shaaaaaaady.

     

    The VERY NICE thing to do would be ask her to pay you the money back, re-issue checks to the graduates, and that way no one would get hurt and your money would be treated the way you wanted it to. However......you could definitely just cut to the chase and pursue action against both the bank and her.



    This is a great idea.


    Yeah no. Don't cover up for everyone
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageanchalmasako:

    imagerobinsokj:
    The bank tellers should be fired. The employee should be fired. That's fraud

    THIS. I used to be a bank teller, and this is definitely grounds for immediate termination. Plus, the lady is also breaking the law by forging your signature on the checks, I believe. That is shaaaaaaady.

     

    The VERY NICE thing to do would be ask her to pay you the money back, re-issue checks to the graduates, and that way no one would get hurt and your money would be treated the way you wanted it to. However......you could definitely just cut to the chase and pursue action against both the bank and her.


    I think she still needs to pursue action against the bank teller. That stuff should not be happening.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagerobinsokj:
    She can go to her bank and see copies of the checks. If the kids signed, which is incredibly unlikely, it's done.

    But, tellers that go cashing things willy billy need to go


    I can see the images onlineshe signed their name and her name side by side.

    I'll mention it to my boss and leave it alone.
  • OP, I would not be shy about reporting it. Who knows if the coworker and/or the bank teller have done this before and will do it again. It's completely shady and unacceptable and you're not doing anyone any favors by keeping quiet.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagemabenner1:
    imageanchalmasako:

    imagerobinsokj:
    The bank tellers should be fired. The employee should be fired. That's fraud

    THIS. I used to be a bank teller, and this is definitely grounds for immediate termination. Plus, the lady is also breaking the law by forging your signature on the checks, I believe. That is shaaaaaaady.

     

    The VERY NICE thing to do would be ask her to pay you the money back, re-issue checks to the graduates, and that way no one would get hurt and your money would be treated the way you wanted it to. However......you could definitely just cut to the chase and pursue action against both the bank and her.

    I think she still needs to pursue action against the bank teller. That stuff should not be happening.

    That is very true. Honestly, a teller that careless probably doesn't need to be a teller any longer. It just sucks cause doing this has a chance of actually hurting OP at work, if action were taken against the admin lady. There's a chance that if she just called the bank, the bank could report the admin lady if they captured her ID (they should have, but with that teller, who knows!)

    daughter born June 2011 via C-Section, son born November 2012 via VBAC
  • imageIcarusalsoflew:
    OP, I would not be shy about reporting it. Who knows if the coworker and/or the bank teller have done this before and will do it again. It's completely shady and unacceptable and you're not doing anyone any favors by keeping quiet.


    Thank you. You are making me feel better. I definitely see Hilarity's view that this could bite me, but at the same time, I can't let it go completely.
  • imageHilarityEnsued:

    imageEstwd2:
    imageHilarityEnsued:
    But a small company and a part time employee starting an entire situation over fraud ad forgery and potentially getting some other parties fired? Yes I do think there is a strong chance that employer cuts ties.
    Huh. I must have too much faith in my employer. I would never in a million years think I'd hear them say "I'm sorry you were the victim of fraud. Oh, and you're fired for reporting a crime."

    yeah no it doesn't go down exactly like this.  Obviously. FFS enough with this.  



    Yeah, they would just wait three months and let me go bc of "budget issues". I know how it could go down. I'm going to tread lightly tomorrow and talk to my boss without bringing emotion into it. I'm just going to tell him the facts and then leave it alone.
  • imagekiraliz2:
    Wait, they were made out to someone else and the bank let her cash them into her account?

    Call the bank and demand an explanation. Not ok.

    Absolutely this. I can't believe they let her do this.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • The issue starts at the bank not with your boss.
  • I would tread carefully. Clearly, what she did was wrong. I don't think it was a huge deal to write a check. I never have cash, but I have a checkbook at work and I would write it out to the kids and not burden the admin with cashing it. I also received a mix of cash and checks for a babyshower that was thrown for me by my coworkers. That being said, I agree with PP that this could end badly.

    If you go forward with this you need to be prepared for a backlash if potentially 2 people are fired and possibly criminal charges are filed. Even though you were not in the wrong at all, you very well could be (wrongly) viewed as the one that made a mountain out of a mole hill and caused a lot of drama that winds up hurting people.

    Personally, I would probably not tell my boss and I might be more likely to say something to the bank, but probably not. I would have a talk with the admin that what she did was wrong and illegal. I would understand if you do speak up, but personally I would not want to be in the middle of that shitstorm.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagerobinsokj:
    The bank tellers should be fired. The employee should be fired. That's fraud

    YES...i'd contact the bank. she can't forge a signature! i worked in a bank - that's fraud for SURE 

    who's to say she even put the $$ in the pot?! 

     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Technically she didn't forge the signatures because she signed her name next to them.  The situation gets a little muddy when dealing with children because many times children don't have their own accounts/IDs to deal with cashing or depositing checks.  For example, a relative wrote a check to DS (2 weeks old at the time) for his baptism.  Honestly, I could have been anyone depositing that check because banks don't require proof of the relationship, the teller had never seen me before, and my last name is not the same as DS's. I just had to put his name, sign my name, and indicate my relationship (parent of minor child).  I encountered similar situations with my foster children, too. 

    Obviously, these children are old enough to have IDs/accounts, but banks encounter all types of odd situations when dealing with businesses.  A fairly common problem is when a check is made out to an individual person instead of the business.  Usually tellers deposit those checks without batting an eye.  In this case, the teller and employee weren't trying to hide the situation.  If that was the case, the only "signature" on each check would have been payee's name.

    There's no great way to make sure that all of the money goes into the pot in this type of a situation. Basically, you have to trust your co-workers. In my office, we can pretty tell based on the amount of the gift that no one has skimmed anything.  If the OP wanted the graduates to know how much she gave, she should have sent the checks herself instead of including them in the group gift.

                      Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageNeener73:

    Technically she didn't forge the signatures because she signed her name next to them.  The situation gets a little muddy when dealing with children because many times children don't have their own accounts/IDs to deal with cashing or depositing checks.  For example, a relative wrote a check to DS (2 weeks old at the time) for his baptism.  Honestly, I could have been anyone depositing that check because banks don't require proof of the relationship, the teller had never seen me before, and my last name is not the same as DS's. I just had to put his name, sign my name, and indicate my relationship (parent of minor child).  I encountered similar situations with my foster children, too. 

    Obviously, these children are old enough to have IDs/accounts, but banks encounter all types of odd situations when dealing with businesses.  A fairly common problem is when a check is made out to an individual person instead of the business.  Usually tellers deposit those checks without batting an eye.  In this case, the teller and employee weren't trying to hide the situation.  If that was the case, the only "signature" on each check would have been payee's name.

    There's no great way to make sure that all of the money goes into the pot in this type of a situation. Basically, you have to trust your co-workers. In my office, we can pretty tell based on the amount of the gift that no one has skimmed anything.  If the OP wanted the graduates to know how much she gave, she should have sent the checks herself instead of including them in the group gift.

    I think you missed the point:

    1) the kids didn't sign, her coworker forged their signatures and then signed next to them. So yes she committed forgery.  Whether the teller knew that is for the bank to investigate but ultimately the coworker did commit fraud and should be charged.

    2) The whole "you have to trust your co-workers" comment is absurd the whole reason she wrote the checks is because she was worried this person was untrustworthy and skimming off the top. She wanted to be part of the group gift so people would know she contributed, since clearly this coworker has no sense of decorum and is blabbing about who has and hasn't contributed but wanted to make sure the money actually got to the kids it was intended for.

    OP for those who are just saying shut up about it. Don't! This is the kind of crap people let go because they don't want to make waves even though they know it's wrong. If you don't say something who will?

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker


     

     

     

    image

  • imagenumeria11:
    imageNeener73:

    Technically she didn't forge the signatures because she signed her name next to them.  The situation gets a little muddy when dealing with children because many times children don't have their own accounts/IDs to deal with cashing or depositing checks.  For example, a relative wrote a check to DS (2 weeks old at the time) for his baptism.  Honestly, I could have been anyone depositing that check because banks don't require proof of the relationship, the teller had never seen me before, and my last name is not the same as DS's. I just had to put his name, sign my name, and indicate my relationship (parent of minor child).  I encountered similar situations with my foster children, too. 

    Obviously, these children are old enough to have IDs/accounts, but banks encounter all types of odd situations when dealing with businesses.  A fairly common problem is when a check is made out to an individual person instead of the business.  Usually tellers deposit those checks without batting an eye.  In this case, the teller and employee weren't trying to hide the situation.  If that was the case, the only "signature" on each check would have been payee's name.

    There's no great way to make sure that all of the money goes into the pot in this type of a situation. Basically, you have to trust your co-workers. In my office, we can pretty tell based on the amount of the gift that no one has skimmed anything.  If the OP wanted the graduates to know how much she gave, she should have sent the checks herself instead of including them in the group gift.

    I think you missed the point:

    1) the kids didn't sign, her coworker forged their signatures and then signed next to them. So yes she committed forgery.  Whether the teller knew that is for the bank to investigate but ultimately the coworker did commit fraud and should be charged.

    2) The whole "you have to trust your co-workers" comment is absurd the whole reason she wrote the checks is because she was worried this person was untrustworthy and skimming off the top. She wanted to be part of the group gift so people would know she contributed, since clearly this coworker has no sense of decorum and is blabbing about who has and hasn't contributed but wanted to make sure the money actually got to the kids it was intended for.

    OP for those who are just saying shut up about it. Don't! This is the kind of crap people let go because they don't want to make waves even though they know it's wrong. If you don't say something who will?



    Thanks for summing this up so well, Numeria11. I'm probably not going to stir the pot too bad.
  • imagembenit4:
    Wpw, this got heated. OP next time don't participate. You don't really know the people, you didn't "trust" the person collecting, you wanted your amount known, etc. Don't nobody have time for that.


    I know! You're right.
  • imagesofamonkey:
    imageHilarityEnsued:

    While this specific incidence is definitely fraud and forgery, you can endorse a check made out to you over to another person for them to deposit. So if the kid in question singed the check over to the admin,the admin could deposit it. I have done this a million times (obviously with actual permission, not forgery).

    OP there is a strong chance you will lose your job if you make a huge war out of this.  I know I am in the minority with this but I don't think you acted right to start with.  None of that excuses forgery or fraud, but I don't know if I would be sounding a million alarms over this.  

    Are you serious, Clark? 

    Yeah, I don't know about being fired for it. However, she would probably be treated like shiit in the office forever after that. As it often is with office politics, people tend to not like tattletales, whistleblowers. I'm not saying that that's acceptable. I'm just saying that, sadly, this happens all too often in office politics. You call someone out for doing something wrong, illegal, etc., and YOU are the one who gets ostracized.

    "To me, you are perfect."
    image

  • imageBateaulover:
    imagerobinsokj:
    She can go to her bank and see copies of the checks. If the kids signed, which is incredibly unlikely, it's done. But, tellers that go cashing things willy billy need to go
    I can see the images onlineshe signed their name and her name side by side. I'll mention it to my boss and leave it alone.

    If you're able to view the back of the check online, and it sounds like you are, you should be able to see both the name of the bank and the branch number where the checks were cashed. 

    In your position, I'd be much more inclined to report this to the branch manager of the bank rather than to your boss.  Although you really should do both.  But the teller's offense is the more serious problem IMO. 

  • imagekrptcmschfmkr128:
    imageNeener73:

    Technically she didn't forge the signatures because she signed her name next to them.

    She signed someone else's name to a document. That is forging a signature. No ifs ands or buts, it is forgery.

    "Forgery is the process of making, adapting, or imitating objects, statistics, or documents with the intent to deceive."  She signed her own name, in addition to the other names.  Therefore, she wasn't trying to hide that she was cashing the checks. 

                      Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagerobinsokj:
    The bank tellers should be fired. The employee should be fired. That's fraud

    This. She is not the parent or legal guardian of those children and should not have been able to deposit or cash those checks. Your complaint need to go directly to your bank, disputing that check, stating that it appears to have been cashed by someone not affiliated with the person you made the check out to, and that you consider it stolen.

    "We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch

    image

     GIFSoup 

    <a href

  • imageHilarityEnsued:

    So she obviously shouldn't hav cashed the checks into her account, but honestly you shouldn't have written out individual checks to the kids in the first place. I was supposed to be a present from the company. If you know enough about office politics to know that you had to pay up, you should have understood that the card want going to be signed:

    happy Graduation! Judy gave $20, Marcia gave $45, Jack gave $30.

    Dd you think that they were not going to include your name in the card?  Either you should have sent those checks separately from the "company gift" or given the money to the Admin or whoever is handling it knowing that the intention was not the give the recipients an envelope full of checks so everyone could get their individual glory.

     

    Not the point.

    "We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch

    image

     GIFSoup 

    <a href

  • imageNeener73:
    imagekrptcmschfmkr128:
    imageNeener73:

    Technically she didn't forge the signatures because she signed her name next to them.

    She signed someone else's name to a document. That is forging a signature. No ifs ands or buts, it is forgery.

    "Forgery is the process of making, adapting, or imitating objects, statistics, or documents with the intent to deceive."  She signed her own name, in addition to the other names.  Therefore, she wasn't trying to hide that she was cashing the checks. 

    But she is also not the legal guardian of the children the checks were made out to, and by signing next to their name she is indicating that she is legally authorized to make decisions for those kids.

    Here is an example.

    When having your ears pierced, you must provide an ID showing that you are over 18. For places that take minors, an adult must provide the ID and sign documentation stating that he/she is the parent or legal guardian of the child being pierced. Those doing the piercing may not check birth certificates or anything; however, the documentation is enough should there be a concern by a child's parent that a step parent or an older sibling took the child in for the piercing, and can be subpoenaed for legal proceedings.

    In the same manner, signing the check recipient's name and one's own name next to it implies that one is legally authorized to cash those checks for someone, unless the recipient him/herself has signed it. In a similar manner, the bank and the recipient could both file legal charges against this person for fraudulently cashing the check.

    Not that difficult people.

    "We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch

    image

     GIFSoup 

    <a href

  • imageNeener73:
    imagekrptcmschfmkr128:
    imageNeener73:

    Technically she didn't forge the signatures because she signed her name next to them.

    She signed someone else's name to a document. That is forging a signature. No ifs ands or buts, it is forgery.

    "Forgery is the process of making, adapting, or imitating objects, statistics, or documents with the intent to deceive."  She signed her own name, in addition to the other names.  Therefore, she wasn't trying to hide that she was cashing the checks. 

    But she hid the fact that the children's signatures were not actually the children's signatures.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"