Reason being is that I am looking to get my tubes tied right after this baby.
I am thinking this is a better way to go, so it could be planned, can have family already here to watch my other 2. Have help ready to go afterward. Dh could be 2 or more hours away for work. (last delivery was just shy of 3 hours) it takes 30min to an hour to get to the hospital. Closest family is over an hour away.
With all that above I think it would be better. Would you consider this? An opinions, thoughts or alternatives welcomed.
Edit because I really need to proof read more.
Re: Really thinking of having a c-section needed an opinion
One question is are you 100% positive you are going to get your tubes tied? Is there any reason you might meet baby and decide another one is an option down the road?
Yes, 3 kiddos is a good number for me and DH we went into TTCing knowing it would be our last. It was either I or DH and since DH travels a lot for work it seems easier that it should be me.
Mom to Cam and Al, now expecting baby number 3, August 2016. Praying for lots of sticky baby dust!
Gotcha - I for some reason wondered if this would be your first and only baby, which is largely what prompted my question.
What were your other births like? Have you had a chance to talk to your OB, if this would be your first cs, and it would be elective without a medical reason? Obviously if you have a prior c/s, most OBs would support a repeat. I'm really supportive of natural childbirth myself and sought a VBAC after a cs with my first, so my opinion would be to seek to have a vaginal birth and have the surgery later, but if you don't feel that way, I can understand why doing both together would be pretty appealing as far as recovery and support.
I am going to disagree that it's easier for you. A vasectomy is an outpatient procedure done in the Dr's office where as a tubal litigation is considered major surgery and I could be wrong but I am pretty sure you go under a general anesthetic for a tubal. No? Obviously not if you are in the midst of a c-section, but as it's own surgery.
Good point - have you guys researched the pros and cons of either one having a procedure/surgery? Anyone know what a woman's hormones are like after a tubal? Do they basically go into menopause?
Personally, I wouldn't choose a c-section. I didn't have one with DD so I really don't know what it's like but that is major surgery and recovery may be rough, especially since you have other kiddos to keep up with. I was worried that DD was breech and I would need a cs - I wanted to avoid it at all costs. I'm not sure but can they do a laparoscopic surgery to tie your tubes at a later date? Less invasive and probably a quicker recovery. (??)
Either way, I would talk to your doctor and see what he/she recommends. Also tell them about your concerns regarding DH being out of town and needing childcare. Maybe as you get closer to your due date your doc would consider scheduling an induction to help ease your concerns if you don't go the c-section route.
I had natural (medicated) births with the first 2. With ds1 I was induced because my liver was shutting down, and he was having heart decells. With ds2 a gallbladder attack sent me into a very fast labor. He asperatied meconuim, life flighted to NICU with a rare stomach infection, he spent 2 weeks there.
I would look into the Essure procedure before getting my tubes tied for permanent sterilization. It's fairly new but it's supposed to be more effective and it's an in office procedure that you are released to normal activity level the following day. I don't have personal experience with having a c-section but, my Mom had three, the last one with a tubal and she said it was a more difficult recovery than the first two. I would definitely talk to your OB about it though, because it does make sense if that is the route you want to go.
Here is some info on Essure:
https://www.essure.com
I c&p'd from wiki because it was easier to understand than my rambling explanation. I just spoke about this with my Mom a few weeks back. She had one after me and it hasn't changed much in 33 years.
After the anesthesia takes effect, a surgeon will make a small incision at each side of, but just below the navel in order to gain access to each of the 2 fallopian tubes. With traditional tubal ligation, the surgeon severs the tubes, and then ties (ligates) them off thereby preventing the travel of eggs to the uterus. Other methods include using clips or rings to clamp them shut, or severing and cauterizing them. Tubal ligation is usually done in a hospital operating-room setting.
I wouldn't have a c/s just for the purposes of getting your tubes tied. It is much easier (and far less painful) for your husband to get a vasectomy.
If you are already needing a c/s for medical reasons then I say go for the tubal ligation, as long as your are 100% sure that you are done.
If you're sure about the tubal, vs vasectomy or something else, I'd get the laparoscopic surgery later.
I personally would never opt for surgery, especially when vaginal is better for baby (so they get your flora, etc). I only understand c/s when it's truly necessary. I would send DH for a vasectomy or get your tubes tied later.
I mean, it's obviously up to you, but if I were in your shoes I would do it.
I added this a little early
I had natural (medicated) births with the first 2. With ds1 I was induced because my liver was shutting down, and he was having heart decells. With ds2 a gallbladder attack sent me into a very fast labor. He asperatied meconuim, life flighted to NICU with a rare stomach infection, he spent 2 weeks there.
I do not know if this would make a difference or not. I am going to bring it up to the doc. and see what he says.
I had an emergency csection with DS and am planning a RCS with this baby. With a scheduled c, you can't be scheduled any earlier than 39 weeks unless there is a pressing medical reason for it, so it's very possible you could go into labor beforehand, so from a convenience standpoint, you really still are at the baby's mercy for arrival times.
I had a great recovery from my first c, but I also didn't have any other kids to take care of and was able to just sit on the couch and nurse for most of the day, with a daily walk thrown in....I think it might be a lot more difficult now chasing a toddler who likes to be held and taking care of the baby...not sure how old your older kids are, but it's something to consider. That said, if you wind up with a c anyway, it would be worth it to have discussed it with your doc in advance and get consented for it. If I were in your shoes, I'd do an IUD postpartum, and then think about surgery once the kids were bigger and didn't need to be carried, lifted into car seats, etc.
My youngest will be just shy of 4 when this baby comes, and the oldest will be almost 7. As far as IUD I have had one after ds1 and it profrated my uterian wall and told that I could not have another one.
I am just considering options on things and looking for opinions and advice, and seeing what else is out there.
I would not consider a c-section outside of medical necessity. There is an increased risk of death with a c-section vs vaginal birth and the is recovery rough. You won't be able to pick up your other children, drive, etc...I had a "easy" recovery, but I still get twinges of pain from my incision over a year later.
Other sterilization options are MUCH more attractive. Having a tubal at a later date is an out patient surgery. A vasectomy is an even shorter procedure. From what you have said about your past deliveries, it doesn't sound like a c-section would have changed anything and the convenience isn't really there considering that recovering from a major abdominal surgery isn't very convenient.
As a hospital mother-baby nurse let me tell you that people don't know the full myriad of risks involved with c/s. Of course it's a perfectly valid option if there's a medical necessity but please don't do it electivelly. You increase your risk of hemorrhage, infection, blood clots, and urinary tract infections. You dramatically increase your pain level and will need prescription meds for much longer after you go home . You would be in the hospital for twice as long. And not to mention the risks to the baby. Your baby is much likely to have respiratory distress after a c/s because the chest wall isn't compressed as it is in a vag delivery.
If you absolutely feel the need to have things pre-planned because of your other two kids why not just plan a scheduled vaginal induction? It's not ideal but at least it would give you peace of mind to know exactly when you will deliver but avoid all the difficulties of a c-section.
I had an emergency C-section with DS, and will have a RSC with this pregnancy as I am not able to have a VBAC. With the first I was not in labor and that makes a big difference in the recovery times, most people who say recovery was difficult went through labor before their C-sections. I was up and about in a few days and felt fine apart from a few twinges here and there after a week, by a month I was pain free and have had no problems since.
Having said that, if you have the option, vaginal birth is better for the baby, although with your history I can see how it would be scary.
I second the pp's post about Essure, it seems much less invasive, if DH wasn't getting a vasectomy it is what I would do , even though I am having a RSC.
Lost Lilah (Audra's twin) at 26 weeks. Cause unknown. Forever in our hearts