September 2013 Moms

VBAC vs. C-Section?

Hi Ladies,

Yesterday during my 9 week appt, my doctor said that since I already had a c-section (back in 2011), I have the option of either a VBAC or another C-Section. With DS I was in labor for 17 hours and even with the pitocin I barely got to 5 cm. We opted for the c-section to avoid the risks of infection or trauma to the baby. I'm tiny, 4' 11", with a small frame, so that may have been why I didn't progress enough...

She mentioned that if I choose VBAC, the chances of complications due to a rupture are less than 1%. She also mentioned that due to the 1st c-section they can't induce me or use too much pitocin as they would with a normal birth.

If I choose to have another C-Section, we would schedule it 1 week before my due date. If I opt for a 2nd c-section, she said if we chose to have a 3rd child there is no option for VBAC since my uterus would be too weak at the incision.

I'm unsure of scheduling a c-section 1 week early because I've always thought you want to keep the baby as close to your due date as possible to give the baby all the time to develop and he/she will come when they're ready. Also, I hated how groggy I was afterwards and the recovery from major surgery.

I'm thinking of going with a VBAC but if I have the same experience with labor of me not progressing, especially since I'll be on less pitocin to help, is it worth even trying if I'll probably end up with another c-section? 

Does anyone have any experience with one or the other? I was checking out the VBAC board but it seems so anti c-section there, I decided against posting. I also looked into the ICAN websites, but they seem way to biased for what I'm looking for.

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!!

BabyFruit Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Visit The Nest! image image

Re: VBAC vs. C-Section?

This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"