Two Under 2

Prepare for war?

Hi Mamas- a question for those of you in the trenches.  Should I be preparing for war?  I feel like I should.  I am a SAHM to an energetic boy and expecting number 2 in June.  MH will be working around 70 hours a week at points and I have no family around and no help.

So- we rent, and I am considering moving into a different, less expensive (and not as fancy) neighborhood so I can higher a nanny part time.  Would you make a move like this to afford outsourcing/ get some extra support?

 

TIA. 

Image and video hosting by TinyPic BabyFetus Ticker

Re: Prepare for war?

  • Personally, I wouldn't move to hire a part time nanny.    The kids aren't little for that long, and ha hate to move!  My experiences with 2 under 2 weren't "that bad" but everyone's children are different, and everyone handle's things differently.  If you feel that your current LO is handful, maybe it's the right move for you.  GL
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Lilypie - (HKbp)Lilypie - (WKbt)
     Lilypie - (2DqE)  Lilypie - (1KYE)
    Lilypie - (RlhZ)Lilypie - (1CAm)
  • Loading the player...
  • I wouldn't necessarily move for that one reason.  However, if you were leaning toward moving anyway, it might not be a bad idea.  A lower COL area would have benefits even after the kids are older.  It would allow more money for savings, family vacations, etc.

    I think having two under two and a husband working 70 hours per week with no other help could definitely be exhausting.  You might not need a part-time nanny, but if someone could come to the house in the middle of the day for a few hours twice a week that might be nice.  It would give you a break to get out and run errands, grocery shop, or maybe even sneak in a pedicure. 

  • I think it's completely unnecessary but I don't know you or your children so you have to be the one to decide.  I didn't think 2u2 was all that challenging - especially the little baby phase.  You will be amazed at how easy a newborn really is comparatively.  I am a sahm and still get at least an hour to myself since I worked hard to get them on the same napping schedule early on.  
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickersLilypie Second Birthday tickersLilypie Pregnancy tickers
  • imageQmommy:
    I think it's completely unnecessary but I don't know you or your children so you have to be the one to decide.  I didn't think 2u2 was all that challenging - especially the little baby phase.  You will be amazed at how easy a newborn really is comparatively.  I am a sahm and still get at least an hour to myself since I worked hard to get them on the same napping schedule early on.  

    All of this! I personally wouldn't move. Yes 2u2 is hard, but its not impossible IMO. And I second the SAHM and still getting time to myself. I also worked hard to get them napping the same and I get at least an hr a day to myself because of it. That newborn phase only lasts so long and it gets easier every day (with some hard days mixed in).  

  • Thank you for your responses. It's hard to imagine what it will be like but I am sure we will find a good routine.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic BabyFetus Ticker
  • You could hire a mothers helper. Much cheaper and just as helpful.
    I had a friends daughter come to our for four hours a day twice a week. She would hang out with the girls while I got stuff done around the house. It cost us about 5 dollars an hour.
    image
    Charlotte 12.3.09
    Madeline 6.24.11
    Eleanor 9.30.13
  • I am a WM but was on ML for 14weeks with my 2. My DH was also gone long hours 6am8pm most days. My mil works but did help occasionally but I was able to manage just fine on my own. It's really not as hard as you expect it to be. You'll get into a routine and actually find some time to yourself.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic


    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"