Very interesting article about the origin of the notion of "self soothing". Wanted to share based on the recent posts by mamas worried that their babies should be doing this by now. Discuss?
https://uncommonjohn.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/selfsoothingpossiblythebiggestlieeverfoistedonparents/
Re: Self Soothing a Lie
It really is a worthwhile read. TIA!
https://uncommonjohn.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/self-soothing-possibly-the-biggest-lie-ever-foisted-on-parents/
back to discuss after I read it
Interesting article. I actually read another article on the study that he references, and got about halfway through before I was like, "wait, what?" It's a really odd "study" that's really just an observation then someone's (IMO, insubstantiated) opinion.
I think somewhere along the way self-soothing became a synonym for staying quiet. The concept of self-soothing obviously exists, I've seen my kid do it both awake and asleep- ie bumping his head, starting to cry, then saying "owie, sowwy, sowwy, Parker okaaay," or by stirring, putting his paci back in and going back to sleep. But STTN doesn't necessarily= self-soothing.
Mostly I object to the idea that I'm somehow harming or hindering my kid by responding the way I do in the MOTN. Self-soothing is a skill to be learned, yes, but I think for my kid it will come with age/time/maturity, not necessarily by being left alone to figure it out.
That is seriously adorable.
I love it too. It really reflects how i approach every day. DS just fell asleep in my lap now, and I'm rocking him and bumping on my phone/ watching house hunters, and ignoring the sweet potatoes he threw onto the floor at dinner. There's plenty of time to clean, but I'm enjoying snuggling him!
Children need independence to learn and grow. Babies need to know that they have someone to care for them. This argument always gets a side eye from me. There is a huge amount of time for learning, growing and independence between 4 months and 5 years when most children start school.
Great article! The part of the CIO claims that I object to the most is this notion that a baby, an infant really, stops crying because they "learn" to self-soothe. An infant's ability to understand cause & effect and to regulate one's emotions & behavior, is very primitive. A 6 month old can understand when we, the parents, disapprove and wants our approval, but does not have the self discipline to control one's impulses. So to theorize that a 6 month old "learns," as in gains a new level of understanding, and then changes his behavior accordingly is pretty ridiculous.
When a baby stops crying and goes to sleep, it's probably because he's tuckered himself out from all the crying. It's not a new level of understanding that got him to finally go to sleep. Alternatively, he may have just given up and realized you're not coming back. I'd hardly call that self-soothe, that's just defeat.
Anecdotally, the few times my daughter has suddenly stopped crying and collapsed into sleep, it was clearly exhaustion that got her there. And she wakes up much sooner in the night - to me that's a sign that her sleep is less restful if she got there by crying.
excellent post.
I've read through all of this gentlemans posts, and he really has quite a balanced approach. I like it.
I do become weary from reading unscientific BS that gets spread around, I am also wary of everything I read on the internet.
You are welcome to raise your child however you see fit, but I hate to tell you that your opinions are not grounded in scientific fact. Babies do not need independence. In fact, without being held enough they can actually die. Obviously this would be neglect type treatment but it was a problem in large orphanages where they had too many infants and the children were only held when fed/changed and otherwise left in a crib. Babies need comfort and human touch as much as they need food.
There is zero evidence that responding to a child at night, or rocking them to sleep, etc, leads to lowered self-confidence, less independence, etc.
No 4m old learns to handle things themselves. FFS they can't even sit up on their own at that age. And a 4m old is hardly comparable to a 5yr old in terms of how to respond to the child.
Even adults need help from family/friends and seek the comfort of others. Humans are social creatures, we NEED other people.
Finally, when we teach children skills, any skill, they learn by watching us, by us helping them. We don't leave them in a room with a pair of sneakers and say, learn to tie these. We demonstrate how. If soothing oneself is a learned skill, then you are doing a disservice to your child by NOT showing her how to soothe.
I think that's the point of the article
There is no evidence at all that not doing CIO will lead to a kindergartener unable to soothe themselves, that's ridiculous. There is also no evidence that kids who CIO and now STTN are actually doing any soothing, they are just quiet.
"At some point" humans have to learn hundreds of things, few of which are appropriate for a 6 month old.
I guess there is a difference in intent here. I didn't always rush to DD's side the second she whimpered (I still don't and I was just annoyed that she was waking up from a short nap and she is now asleep again). But, it wasn't because I was teaching her independence. It was because I learned that she wasn't necessarily actually awake and just making some noise. Going to her 'aide' was actually just waking her up. There was a learning curve involved.
I am not totally against CIO either. I just think a lot of my issue with CIO is the idea that somehow a child MUST be independent the second the umbilical cord is cut. I just don't think it works that way. Every child develops different skills at different ages. My DD speaks in complete sentences. She is nowhere near ready to PT and wets her diaper the second I put it on. I know lots of kids her age that are PT and can't string two words together. Both kids are normal...just developing different skills at different times. Self soothing is the same. You have to know your child and respond to your child's needs.
But, the idea that a 4 month old should be independent still makes me scratch my head.
No. Ferber doesn't advocate just leaving a baby to cry until they pass out(contrary to popular belief).
CIO was coined by Dr. Holt in the book "The Care and Feeding of Children" back in the late 1800s.
Married 6/28/03
Kate ~ 7/3/09 *** Connor ~ 11/11/10
4 miscarriages: 2007, 2009, 2013, 2014
*~*~*~*~*
No more TTC for us. We are done, and at peace, as a family of 4.
"Suffering has been stronger than all other teaching, and has taught me to understand what your heart used to be. I have been bent and broken, but – I hope – into a better shape.” — Charles Dickens
The article was excellent and relevant, but the comments were where the miring-down occurred, at least for me. I agree with what the article said and it confirms what I have been taught and believe and have practiced as a parent and family member. Mine is a big family of loud, loving, creative, whimsical, adventurous, entrepreneurial folks. Can't beat that for results!
And sleep scheduling? I don't even claim to know what that entails, but I can't imagine letting my baby lie awake crying and refuse to interact with him because I 'think' he needs to be sleeping when he is clearly hungry at 2am. Weird.