They are doing a study here at the hospital I'm doing my IVF at. Has Anyone ever done one? Do you recommend it?
me 40, DH 39... FSH:8.6 AMH 2.3 AFC:15...
DH: MF: sx for Double Varicocele, SA 45 mil, motil: 50%, morph 3%- "lazy swimmers!"...
Me: All "normal" but aging eggs most likely... ;-/
DS: 4/29/05-7 yrs old
MC 9 weeks: 9/21/11
TTC for 3 yrs...7/2012:
1st IUI: BFN 8/2012:
2nd IUI: BFN...
Need a break already!
IVF #1 in progress Jan 2013: Antagonist Prot.: Gonal F 300/Menopur 150
ER: 15 follies, 12 retrieved, 10 mature, 10 fertilized...grow embies grow!
1/8/13: BFN.
Re: Should I do a research study??
***SAIF/PAIF***
I can't speak to specific studies regarding IVF, but as a researcher, I would recommend considering it. Definitely read everything, so you know who is conducting the research (I would be wary of a drug company vs. a known gov't agency or university, for example), and what your participation would entail.
If you feel comfortable with what is being asked, go for it, because your participation can help others dealing with IF down the line. Does this study cover IVF costs as well, or is it just asking you to participate?
IVF #1: 9/11: ER: 12R, 11M, 10F, No Frosties; 5dt: 2 blasts, 1 morula; DD born 6/3/12
IVF #2: 11/12-12/12: ER: 20R, 20M, 16F, 4 Frosties; 5dt: 3 blasts, DS born 8/9/13
It should in no way compromise your treatment, or they wouldn't be allowed to do it. All studies must receive approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), and their job is to ensure minimal harm to the participant. In your case, I cannot see how they would allow a study to take place that would impact your chance of success.
The only possible exception might be if it was a clinical trial, so the potential risks would be unknown, hence the purpose of the study, but the intent would be to have results be as good or better than standard treatment, and there would have to be some proof to have no known harmful methods to the participant, or at the very least, they would have to be disclosed.
It sounds like you are good to go, if you'd like to participate, and I would recommend it to you, but bottom line is, it's totally your call. Good luck to you!
IVF #1: 9/11: ER: 12R, 11M, 10F, No Frosties; 5dt: 2 blasts, 1 morula; DD born 6/3/12
IVF #2: 11/12-12/12: ER: 20R, 20M, 16F, 4 Frosties; 5dt: 3 blasts, DS born 8/9/13
SAIF response below
I participated in a clinical trial for my one and only IVF. To be completely honest, I wanted to participate because I am completely OOP for everything, and the study provided my drugs free of charge and I received a discount off of the cost of my cycle. The particular study did not really change my treatment plan by very much, though I had to be on double the amount of Lupron than my RE normally gives. Also there was slightly less flexibility in how much they could increase my dose. Fortunately I didn't need to go over the allowed amount. I was also very comfortable with either arm of the study so I did not worry about it compromising my care from that point of view.
If you are comfortable with the parameters of the study and feel like it won't hurt your chances at success, I would say go for it.
IVF #1 ET 1 d3 embryo 10/30/11 BFP
3 Embryos frozen (1 d5, 2 d6)
DS born 07/29/12
FET #1 ET 1 d5 embryo 02/10/15 BFN
FET #2 1 d6 embryo didn't survive thaw, transferred last d6. CP
and chemicals on our fertility, something i believe strongly in so im happy to do it. they only take blood and urine, hair sample, and some of the follicular fluid at ER, which the embryologist throws out anyways after. i get to see what my lead and mercury levels are right away and they also test hormones and things like that. I get $50 every time i pee in a cup so not too bad :-) im doing it anyway at each visit so they just take a little extra for the study.