So I've seen a trend lately where women are getting induced before they even reach their due date. This past June my SIL was induced a couple days before her due date, and a fellow coworker just announced she is being induced early. She is not due until the 6th but she is getting induced this Wednesday because "he doesn't want to come out"

I understand towards the end you're exhausted and sore and just totally done with being pregnant but come on, if baby and mom are perfectly healthy leave baby in until he's ready to come out on his own! Also, I've heard nothing but painful things about Pitocin and how much more terrible it makes contractions....why would you want to do that intentionally?! Anyone else have thoughts/vents on this topic?
Re: Thoughts on inducing before due date
I'm in the way of thinking that baby will come when baby is ready. If that means I go 41 weeks+, then I go 41wks+.
It actually p*sses me off when moms get induced for no medical reason. As for Pitocin though, they 99% of the time give you an epidural with it.
I know someone who was not in labor, and she ended up being in labor for at least 36 hours because she was induced (no labor, no water breaking, no nothing) so her body wasn't really ready. It made me really mad.
I had GD and I was not induced, but went 9 days early (but I think if my doctor knew how big my baby had been or was going to be, she may have induced me).
I completely agree with you. I'm not a medical professional but I feel like it would make for a much smoother labor and delivery if you let your body do what it's born to do and give birth on its own. I totally get having to do it for an urgent medical reason, but if it's simply out of convenience that's completely ridiculous.
I'm not a fan of inducing for non medical reasons/convenience before 40w but to each their own.
Oh the girl I knew was induced one day early *eyeroll*. Her baby weighed the same as mine, so it wasn't like her baby was huge or anything and needed to be born now.
My husband's coworker's wife was about 4 weeks late. She said she didn't want to be induced and I don't think she was. She had her baby 4 weeks late, and I think they're all fine.
Right now I say I would not induce unless medically necessary. Ask me again in late July/August, I might be miserable and feel differently then.
I have absolutely no issue with inductions in your situations, I said right in my original post that I am against it only if mom and baby are perfectly healthy and it's just out of convenience. Obviously if doctors feel that baby needs to come out ASAP due to a medical reason I am all for that. Saying I would prefer to put you and your baby at risk is ridiculous.
I actually had to look around to find an office that will let you go to 42 weeks without induction if there are no other medical issues. It wasn't easy! Most say 40-41 weeks max, or they will let you go into the 42nd week but not finish it. That made me really mad. I was born only 2 weeks early according to my mom's EDD, but I was much smaller and have had some birth-related health issues my whole life. And my she even went into labor naturally so I was ready, but it just goes to show that even 2 weeks early can have it's issues.
My SIL had to be induced early because of a blood clotting disorder and the meds she was on, which I understand, but to induce just to "get it out of the way" kind of upsets me. It's not in the best interest for the baby and just seems like a selfish decision on either the part of the parent or the doctor.
B born 7/15/13, C born 3/2/15, #3 on the way May '17
I’m a modern man, a man for the millennium. Digital and smoke free. A diversified multi-cultural, post-modern deconstruction that is anatomically and ecologically incorrect. I’ve been up linked and downloaded, I’ve been inputted and outsourced, I know the upside of downsizing, I know the downside of upgrading. I’m a high-tech low-life. A cutting edge, state-of-the-art bi-coastal multi-tasker and I can give you a gigabyte in a nanosecond! I’m new wave, but I’m old school and my inner child is outward bound. I’m a hot-wired, heat seeking, warm-hearted cool customer, voice activated and bio-degradable. I interface with my database, my database is in cyberspace, so I’m interactive, I’m hyperactive and from time to time I’m radioactive.
Inductions were initially instated to help a mother along who had impending danger to her or the child. I feel like they have become, however, a procedure of connivance. Any mother who is two days over is started on a Pitocin drip and may end up with an unplanned c-section, that may or may not have been necessary.
When the fruit is ripe, it will fall from the tree!
A doctor can convince a mother that this procedure is necessary, so if anything, this is on the mother to become educated about the possible side effects of induction. I'm not trying to vilify OB/GYNs, but I think people need to have a birth plan, and if the pitocin drip has no pertinent medical reason, it should not be included.
My two cents, anyways
This. There are so many risks to early inductions that unless it was warranted, it would never be worth the risk to me.
All of this. I was induced at exactly 40
weeks. I had slow fetal movement and
my Dr. though it made sense for us to induce. I didn't tell too many people I
was being induced for fear of
judgement, even though it was advised. A couple days early is nbd. If it were a week or two and for no reason, that'd be different. I think you'd be hard pressed these days to find a Dr willing to voluntarily induce early for no medical reason.
[MC 11.20.11] [DS born 9.24.12] [DD born 10.15.14]
4 weeks late? That's just negligence. Sorry. This doesn't even make sense. At some point after 42 weeks, it becomes dangerous for a fetus to be still inside you. I may be wrong but i think it's 42 and a half weeks or so. My Dr said they wouldn't let me go past 42 weeks.
[MC 11.20.11] [DS born 9.24.12] [DD born 10.15.14]