I had my 34wk check up with one of the nine OBs at my OB clinic. He told me that DH and I need to sit down and really think about whether or not we want to attempt vaginal or c-section. Right now both babies are head-down.
The OB told me we're prime candidates for a vaginal delivery but ultimately it's up to us and I've become incredibly indecisive about this. We are leaning c-section for mulitiple (not VBAC) reasons but he suggested making a pro/con list for each and prioritizing the pros/cons. He said either way he'd support our decision but that he is a proponent of vaginal deliveries. His words: Vaginal is the safest type of delivery for any baby including twins when both are vertex, followed by scheduled c-section, followed by emergency c-section. (this was in response to my concerns that vaginally B might flip after A delivers and I don't want her going into distress from a breech delivery).
I am asking for your honest insights. I hope everyone will respect each other's input because I'm pretty sure there is not "right" answer but your experiences and insights may help us see things from a perspective which we may have not considered. Thank you, in advance.
Re: C-Section vs. Vaginal Delivery...Time to Decide
Thank you for the quick response. Next question is why? Why not c-section - what made you so sure vaginally was the way to go? And I'm honestly trying to see things from different perspectives, I'm not being sassy
Obviously, your vaginal delivery went well? Cute babes!
I agree it sure sounds a lot better - plus I want to be able to hold them/BF ASAP.
Were either of you worried that B would flip? Or did B and you delivered breech?
I'll copy and paste my response to someone else just below about breech extraction:
This is where I'm at now and DH feels very strongly about a c-section but the OB I saw today (who will be out of the country if we make it to 38 weeks) is pretty convincing on the ole vag delivery.
Honestly, I was most worried about my recovery after a c-section. I knew that any issues the babies might have could be resolved in the NICU but once I left the hospital, I was on my own (with DH's help of course) to care for them, DD1 and myself. I felt like if I was in a lot of pain, my children wouldn't get the attention from me that they needed. But those are my personal feelings. You have to do what's right for you.
Nothing against your DH but I'd probably trust your dr's opinion more. When I tried to talk to my DH about my delivery options, he didn't have a clue. But now looking back, he says I definitely made the right decision.
I had to make the same decision just a few months ago. All of the OBs in my practice were of the same mindset as yours. I decided to take their advice and try for the vaginal delivery, and I'm glad I did. Both of my babies were head down, but my OB (and all of her partners) was more than comfortable doing a breech extraction if necessary. I ended up successfully delivering both vaginally!
ETA: The main reason I decided to try for vaginal is because 6 different OBs and all of my nurses (I was on hospital bedrest) thought it was the safest option for me and my babies. Since they're the professionals, I decided they knew more than DH and I did. Their main reasons were that the recovery would be easier on me, and since my babies were going to be in the NICU, that was important to me, and going through the birth canal squeezes fluid out of the babies' lungs.
7/30/12 - B/G twins born at 33w4d due to PPROM
I can not fathom why anyone would ever opt for a c-section if their baby/babies are in a perfect position for a safe vaginal birth.
It's your call in the end, but I would (and did) avoid a c/s at all costs. Invasive surgery for no good reason is never the right answer, imo.
Ok, hadn't put in that perspective even it seems SO obvious - the doctors do know best and they certainly won't put us in a bad situation. I need to remember that.
I just don't think of breech as safe nor do most of the OBs in the practice who could end up delivering depending on who is on call (and refuse to do them) and my worst fear, of course, is that Baby B will do a flippy-do and end up breech or transverse and I'd end up with a vaginal and c/s recovery.
This is a really tough one. I am scheduled for a c-section due to the positions of my twins, but if the type of delivery were up to me, I'd probably go with my doctor's recommendation. That said, the thought of a vaginal delivery with twins scares me, just because I have read so many stories about baby b flipping/baby b having problems/the dreaded double whammy.
My doctor said that she would recommend vaginal delivery if both twins were vertex or if just baby a was vertex (in that case it would be up to me, though). I think that if both of my babies were vertex, I'd probably go vaginal on my doctor's recommendation, but if baby b were breech, I'd opt for the c-section. Personally, I am sort of glad that there is no decision to make in my case! I have heard that a c-section recovery is not so bad if it is planned and not an emergency.
You may want to check and make sure that your insurance would cover you for a c-section if both babies are vertex. I seem to remember someone questioning that on this board at some point...?
thanks for posting the question and thanks to all who answered - we are also looking into pros and cons and the best birth plan so all this info really helps!
Vag. I HATED the c-section. Blah
I had a vaginal natural birth with DS & it was much better. I am still not right after the c-section 14 weeks later.
My twins were born 1 week ago...it was a double whammy. The first night and day were HORRIBLE and I don't wish a c-section on any one. Perhaps if I'd only had a c-section and had nothing to compare it to, I wouldn't think it was that bad, but having had a vaginal delivery for my first DS and a vaginal delivery for Baby A this time I can say that a c-section is 100x worse recovery wise.
The double whammy sucked, but if trying for vaginal means that you can try avoiding a c-section rather than just selecting one, that's absolutely what I would suggest. The pain from my c-section was so bad that I hardly noticed any pain from the vaginal birth. That's my .02!
I would choose vaginal no matter what if I was in your situation. I can't imagine taking care of twin newborns and a toddler after surgery. Recovery is faster and you aren't going through a major surgery.
ETA: Also, the risks of a VBAC scare me to death and since we want more children, I would like to stay away from that because I would prefer to deliver all my children vaginally and not be forced to have a csection simply because I had one before.
I would opt for vaginal! My boys were both head down and we gave it a go. I failed to progress and ended up with a c-section. Because of this, my boys didn't get what they needed in terms of the fluid being pushed out of their lungs at birth and both needed NICU time, one needed to be intubated and on a ventilator for about an hour to get the fluid out. I think if I were able to have a vaginal birth, we could have avoided the NICU.
Good luck!
I'm going to be the odd ball here and say c-section. I've only have my twins so I've never givin birth vaginally. But I will say it wasn't an experience that I felt like I needed to have. I couldn't have given birth vaginally even if I wanted to based on their positions but I was already schedualed for a c-section for the following week anyway. I chose c-section because I felt it was the less stressful option for me and the babies. I also didn't want to risk recovering from both a vaginal delivery and a c-section incase my Baby B flipped to breech after delivering A. Not to mention the day I went into labor (exactly 1 week before my schedualed c-section) My contractions were very intense and 2 minutes apart, yet I was only 1cm dialated and 50%. I imagine that would have been a long labor, but thats just my specific story.
As far as recovery goes...yes I was sore but I was able to move around fine on my own from the day I left the hospital, I just moved a little slower. Now like I mentioned, I only have my twins, so I didn't have a toddler to try and take of too and my husband was also able to take off for a month after they were born. But as I said before, I was able to move around fine on my own about 5 days after they were born, just moved carefully and a little slower. I found getting up and sitting down to be the hardest parts, but once I was either up or down I felt fine. My twins were born perfectly healthy and had no problems breathing, but I can definitely understand the concern about the fluid not being squeezed out of their lungs. That just didn't end up being an issue thankfully in our case.
In the end both options are safe options, both happen everyday. It's what you feel is best for you and your babies. Good luck
Married since June 2010
TTC #1 since 04/2011
3 abnormal PAPs and 2 colpo/biopsy since 09/2009
LEEP 05/2011
ASCUS PAP 08/2011 which means no PAP for 6 months!! YAY!!
BFP 11/6/11!! EDD: 7/15/12
1st u/s 11/21/11: TWINS!
16 wks 1/30/12: BOY and GIRL!
Schedualed c-section for 7/2/12 38wks 1day
Went into labor 6/25/12 37wks 1day. Delivered two healthy babies