DH and I have been house hunting for the last year with very little luck, and now we seem to have two houses to pick from. House #1 is a waterfront place, 4 bedrooms, 2 baths but needs a lot of updating. House #2 has a beautiful view of the water, but no access, 5 bedrooms, 4 baths, and totally updated. Both are in nice neighborhoods, unoccupied, so we could move asap, and both are on 2+ acres of property. Obviously lakefront property appreciates in value a lot faster than simply lake-view property, but when I say updating, I mean pretty much gutting the first floor (it's livable, but totally 80's). Also, they both have hot tubs, and again first world problem here, but we both hate hot tubs (I got a rash from one once, and I just get so grossed out by them now), and the sellers act like their doing us a favor by including it.
WWYD? Also, anyone in MN want a hot tub? I may have one on the market here pretty soon.
Re: First World Problems - NBR
If they are in the same price range I personally would probably go with the waterview property since it has more bedrooms.
Wow, yep, FWP! But congrats on whichever house you choose. Personally, I would choose what's move-in ready because the cost of those updates could potentially make them not end-up happening for a long time. Plus the extra bedrooms and TWO extra baths would be a HUGE bonus!
Have fun deciding!
For me, it'd be lake front. No contest. We bought our house looking straight out of the 70's and updated the kitchen and guest bath ourselves. Master bath still needs to be done. It has shared frontage on Lake Michigan and we knew it'd keep its value. Plus, we LOVE having a beach a short walk away. It'd be so awesome to actually be right on the water.
But, on the other hand, maybe you need the bigger house? I wouldn't want to have to clean 4 bathrooms unless I had to