Would you consider not sending your child to school in K and beyond? I have a friend whose child is physically and mentally delayed. The family is considering not sending her to K saying "what would she get from it".
Now this is truly a loving family, but is questioning the point.
I think he should go to school and all kids can benefit from being around other kids. You never know what is absorbed/learned. You know never know when a break through will happen.
By law do you have to send your kids to school or prove you are truly homeschooling them?
Re: anyone not sending kids to school?
Yes, you must send your child or prove you are homeschooling.
I agree with your opinion. There are teachers for people of all ability levels, and both academic and life skills. We can never truly predict a person's potential. In my opinion, it is not ethical to not provide one's child with all available opportunities for personal development.
That said, a child who has a severe or terminal illness might benefit from a home tutor, which a school district could provide. Every situation is different, so I try not to judge or offer my opinion unless it is my place to do so.
I agree with all of this.
When I was in high school there was a girl named Jessie in my choir class. She couldn't speak, couldn't make eye contact and was extremely cognitively delayed. She was in a wheel chair. This girl LOVED choir though! It was really nice to see how much she enjoyed her favorite songs even though she couldn't join in. I don't know how much she was able to actually learn but even to a bunch schoolers who aren't exactly known to be socially observant it was very obvious that she enjoyed coming to school!