Attachment Parenting

Hey guess what? CIO is ok!!!

I'm not sure if anyone caught the 2-minute clip on the NBC nightly news last night, but they informed America that CIO is actually ok.  Apparently all of us who are in the AP world are idiots for thinking that letting our kids CIO is going to damage them and that by age 5, all kids are the same.  So, ladies, tonight just drop the baby in the crib and have a margarita on the porch.  No biggie, the news says we can.  The kid won't remember anyway, right??!!  Confused
Lilypie Second Birthday tickers

Re: Hey guess what? CIO is ok!!!

  • The article is Rey misleading as the sample size was very small and it stated that although kids rom 7 mos to six y.o. were studied, pos. effects were only evident o age two.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Loading the player...
  • I saw this and gave it major side-eyeage. 

    While I haven't read the study referenced, what struck me from the newscast was that they were comparing two different types of sleep training, which isn't exactly CIO vs. non-CIO.  Also, not at all sure what their criteria was for measuring the biological impact years down the line, seems like that would be extremely difficult to quantify, not to mention, possibly not the point to begin with.

    imagephoto 64bf363d-3af0-4dcc-b880-c06326daa418_zps78d8d389.jpg
    *My Blog*
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    photo 0cc607b9-4233-4842-8175-d093f8f92ca8_zps7cc00875.jpg
    10/50 Read

    my read shelf:
    Stephanie's book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)
  • Totally misleading and sensationalist headline; the article had nothing to do with hard-core, "babywise" style CIO; it only suggested that letting a baby CIO for a few minutes, or under parental supervision was OK.

     I *** hate the media news outlets. Thanks to them now child abusers and negligent parents everywhere are feeling pretty good about themselves.

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Oh, FFS. I am so tired of this BS. The "dangers" of CIO are over stated and the assumption that people who use the method are selfish and hate their children is ridiculous.  

    And, no, I did not see the newscast or read the study. I am specifically responding to the OP. 

    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickersLilypie Second Birthday tickersLilypie Angel and Memorial tickers




  • imagepepomntpat:

    Oh, FFS. I am so tired of this BS. The "dangers" of CIO are over stated and the assumption that people who use the method are selfish and hate their children is ridiculous.  

    And, no, I did not see the newscast or read the study. I am specifically responding to the OP. 

     

    This.  I consider our style of "parenting" to be pretty attachment-style, but at 5 months old, we moved our daughter out of our room into her own room and did the increasing-intervals of comfort sleep training.  It sucked for 2 nights.  On the third night she pretty much stopped crying and went right to sleep after a few minutes.  From the fourth night til today, as a general rule, she goes to bed drowsy but awake at 8 PM and sleeps until 4:00 AM, when she wakes up for a feeding, and then goes back down til around 6 or 6:30 AM.  

    She is a different person since we have done this--so happy and well rested during the day.  Tons of smiles and noises.  Before we sleep trained, she just wasn't getting good, restful, sufficiently-long blocks of sleep in our room with all the noises of three people sleeping.  Am I glad that we co-roomed with her for the first few months?  Yes, because it is shown to reduce the risks of SIDS.  But by the time we moved her to her own room and did sleep training, it was time for that. And we did it for her own needs and she is happier because of it. 

    People who are super dramatic about the "dangers" of CIO probably haven't read the brain development books that show babies really need long blocks of sleep where they process through 2-3 sleep cycles before waking.  When our LO was in our room, she would pretty much wake up every 45 minutes at the end of each sleep cycle--not healthy!

    You can practice attachment parenting and sleep train.  It is not an either/or dichotomy.

  • imagesomebodysmama21:
    Yeah that ticked me off. It said 'letting your baby cry for a few minutes' won't damage them. Uhh how much if a few minutes talk about seriously vague. Yeah I will let her cry for a few minutes if I am using the bathroom or CANNOT get to her but seriously not going to just let her cry because a bunch of think you know it all jerks say the only reason I don't let my kid cry is for myself.

    This totally

    photo b6d12d4a-3c41-4686-a0af-8cf854f979e4_zpsffdadc4c.jpg Pregnancy Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagesadsadie:

    Totally misleading and sensationalist headline; the article had nothing to do with hard-core, "babywise" style CIO; it only suggested that letting a baby CIO for a few minutes, or under parental supervision was OK.

     I *** hate the media news outlets. Thanks to them now child abusers and negligent parents everywhere are feeling pretty good about themselves.

    Wait, you're saying that people who use a CIO method are child abusers and negligent parents? I can't feel right about allowing my children to CIO without me there and so I don't. But that's a far cry from thinking that those who do are abusing their children. You've taken that too far. 

  • imagejudahsmommy1:
    imagesadsadie:

    Totally misleading and sensationalist headline; the article had nothing to do with hard-core, "babywise" style CIO; it only suggested that letting a baby CIO for a few minutes, or under parental supervision was OK.

     I *** hate the media news outlets. Thanks to them now child abusers and negligent parents everywhere are feeling pretty good about themselves.

    Wait, you're saying that people who use a CIO method are child abusers and negligent parents? I can't feel right about allowing my children to CIO without me there and so I don't. But that's a far cry from thinking that those who do are abusing their children. You've taken that too far. 

     

    How I read her post is that negligent parents would use the headline to "validate" the way they are doing things, people who are neglecting their kids. I didn't get the CIO is neglect.

     ---

    I didn't see this on the news, and I'm glad I didn't. As someone who has read primary research (on different topics) I've seen enough how media can portray something that I really don't spend to much time on sensationalized studies.

    DD born January 2012 Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker image image image
  • I'm a RN and got an email about this study. The two methods studies were graduated extinction Ferber and parental supported sleep training a la Sleep Lady shuffle, not full blown CIO. The study suggests that at 6 year old, there were no statistically significant differences in the Ferber, Sleep Lady and no sleep training groups with regards to attachment, mental abilities, etc. I don't have the article with me, but I do remember thinking there were numerous flaws with it. However, my first DS was a horrible sleeper and just started STTN at 3. I will not be doing that again and if DS2 follows the saw path, I will do a variant of Ferber or Sleep Lady. Being sleep deprived for 3 years is not maintaining balance...
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    What just happened in my diaper?!
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"