Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Between those two I am surprised.
I remember the Ateal photo, also cute but it's too bad some perv had to make a creepy comment on it. Putting babies in suggestive positions is crossing the line, unless it's for something like what we do, a photo contest, but there is still a line in that and I don't feel anyone has crossed it (yet). I didn't see the fishnets, sounds like too much. Oh wait! The teeny bopper, like 11 in a half top? That was too much. Unless she was a part of a dance crew or something. There is a photo in someone's signature right now that makes me cringe...
Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Between those two I am surprised.
I remember the Ateal photo, also cute but it's too bad some perv had to make a creepy comment on it. Putting babies in suggestive positions is crossing the line, unless it's for something like what we do, a photo contest, but there is still a line in that and I don't feel anyone has crossed it (yet). I didn't see the fishnets, sounds like too much. Oh wait! The teeny bopper, like 11 in a half top? That was too much. Unless she was a part of a dance crew or something. There is a photo in someone's signature right now that makes me cringe...
It was some trashy looking mom holding up her baby in a two piece swimsuit with pink fishnets on. I don't know what you are talking about?
Also I am REALLY curious about the siggy pic you are referring to??? Is said person on our board??
Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Between those two I am surprised.
I remember the Ateal photo, also cute but it's too bad some perv had to make a creepy comment on it. Putting babies in suggestive positions is crossing the line, unless it's for something like what we do, a photo contest, but there is still a line in that and I don't feel anyone has crossed it (yet). I didn't see the fishnets, sounds like too much. Oh wait! The teeny bopper, like 11 in a half top? That was too much. Unless she was a part of a dance crew or something. There is a photo in someone's signature right now that makes me cringe...
It was some trashy looking mom holding up her baby in a two piece swimsuit with pink fishnets on. I don't know what you are talking about?
Also I am REALLY curious about the siggy pic you are referring to??? Is said person on our board??
I didn't see that fishnet picture. Ugh, the signature is butterbrot's. I really like her but her picture is too much for me.
Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Between those two I am surprised.
I remember the Ateal photo, also cute but it's too bad some perv had to make a creepy comment on it. Putting babies in suggestive positions is crossing the line, unless it's for something like what we do, a photo contest, but there is still a line in that and I don't feel anyone has crossed it (yet). I didn't see the fishnets, sounds like too much. Oh wait! The teeny bopper, like 11 in a half top? That was too much. Unless she was a part of a dance crew or something. There is a photo in someone's signature right now that makes me cringe...
It was some trashy looking mom holding up her baby in a two piece swimsuit with pink fishnets on. I don't know what you are talking about?
Also I am REALLY curious about the siggy pic you are referring to??? Is said person on our board??
I didn't see that fishnet picture. Ugh, the signature is butterbrot's. I really like her but her picture is too much for me.
If it's the pic I'm thinking of, teeny bopper in bra top, it was a pic of one of the Real Housewives mom with her kid, think the new jersey one. Someone just posted the pic on here
Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Between those two I am surprised.
I remember the Ateal photo, also cute but it's too bad some perv had to make a creepy comment on it. Putting babies in suggestive positions is crossing the line, unless it's for something like what we do, a photo contest, but there is still a line in that and I don't feel anyone has crossed it (yet). I didn't see the fishnets, sounds like too much. Oh wait! The teeny bopper, like 11 in a half top? That was too much. Unless she was a part of a dance crew or something. There is a photo in someone's signature right now that makes me cringe...
It was some trashy looking mom holding up her baby in a two piece swimsuit with pink fishnets on. I don't know what you are talking about?
Also I am REALLY curious about the siggy pic you are referring to??? Is said person on our board??
I didn't see that fishnet picture. Ugh, the signature is butterbrot's. I really like her but her picture is too much for me.
I think Mrs.Teddy posted it. She was searching for someone on FB and just randomly saw the picture as someone's profile pic. Let me see if I can find it.
EESH!! WTF! No, not okay. Terrible attire, terrible idea, (Let's position the baby on the lamp post so it looks like a stripper!!! Awwe! So cute!) and I noticed the light socket for some reason amongst all that.
Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Between those two I am surprised.
I remember the Ateal photo, also cute but it's too bad some perv had to make a creepy comment on it. Putting babies in suggestive positions is crossing the line, unless it's for something like what we do, a photo contest, but there is still a line in that and I don't feel anyone has crossed it (yet). I didn't see the fishnets, sounds like too much. Oh wait! The teeny bopper, like 11 in a half top? That was too much. Unless she was a part of a dance crew or something. There is a photo in someone's signature right now that makes me cringe...
It was some trashy looking mom holding up her baby in a two piece swimsuit with pink fishnets on. I don't know what you are talking about?
Also I am REALLY curious about the siggy pic you are referring to??? Is said person on our board??
I didn't see that fishnet picture. Ugh, the signature is butterbrot's. I really like her but her picture is too much for me.
Wow. Alright. I am done here, ladies. It's been great and all, but wow. No thanks.
Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Between those two I am surprised.
I remember the Ateal photo, also cute but it's too bad some perv had to make a creepy comment on it. Putting babies in suggestive positions is crossing the line, unless it's for something like what we do, a photo contest, but there is still a line in that and I don't feel anyone has crossed it (yet). I didn't see the fishnets, sounds like too much. Oh wait! The teeny bopper, like 11 in a half top? That was too much. Unless she was a part of a dance crew or something. There is a photo in someone's signature right now that makes me cringe...
It was some trashy looking mom holding up her baby in a two piece swimsuit with pink fishnets on. I don't know what you are talking about?
Also I am REALLY curious about the siggy pic you are referring to??? Is said person on our board??
I didn't see that fishnet picture. Ugh, the signature is butterbrot's. I really like her but her picture is too much for me.
Wow. Alright. I am done here, ladies. It's been great and all, but wow. No thanks.
I honestly thought it was a cute picture with how he was holding th book with her. I'm guessing the majority of us on here thought that.
Really? REALLY? I haven't read the FFFC but remembered her picture, the Titanic one and it WAS NOT that bad. Jeez. I thought it was cute. People need to chill.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Between those two I am surprised.
I remember the Ateal photo, also cute but it's too bad some perv had to make a creepy comment on it. Putting babies in suggestive positions is crossing the line, unless it's for something like what we do, a photo contest, but there is still a line in that and I don't feel anyone has crossed it (yet). I didn't see the fishnets, sounds like too much. Oh wait! The teeny bopper, like 11 in a half top? That was too much. Unless she was a part of a dance crew or something. There is a photo in someone's signature right now that makes me cringe...
It was some trashy looking mom holding up her baby in a two piece swimsuit with pink fishnets on. I don't know what you are talking about?
Also I am REALLY curious about the siggy pic you are referring to??? Is said person on our board??
I didn't see that fishnet picture. Ugh, the signature is butterbrot's. I really like her but her picture is too much for me.
Wow. Alright. I am done here, ladies. It's been great and all, but wow. No thanks.
I honestly thought it was a cute picture with how he was holding th book with her. I'm guessing the majority of us on here thought that.
I don't want to go down as an overly dramatic bish here; I know that most of you thought that, huahua. I thought it, too, obviously, otherwise I wouldn't have use the picture as my signature.
But when someone sexualizes my kid, it's time to say goodbye. This actually has me in tears, embarrassing as that is, because I really liked posting here. But I have to draw the line somewhere, and megoguen's comment was just too much.
Butterbrot, I never noticed the shot and saw two children reading. I don't think the majority of the board saw it. Please stay.
Sorry no paragraphs, bumping from my phone.
I once had a picture until the trolls showed up.
TTC #1 7/08 PCOS dx 8/28/04 Met 1000 mg and Clomid cycles 1-4 1/6/09-5/2/09 BFN
Clomid 100mg 6/4/09=O'd=BFP on 6/29/09! Beta@14DPO 70.8 Beta@16DPO 152. EDD 3/7/10.
First u/s on 7/13/09 @6w0d heard and saw heartbeat 102 bpm.
K M #1 arrived via c/s 3/1/10 10 lbs, 22 inches long at 39 weeks.
Surprise expecting #2. Med-free BFP on 8/1/11!
Beta@15DPO 58.2 Beta@17DPO 198.3 Beta@23DPO 2338. EDD 4/9/12
K M #2 arrived via c/s 3/19/12 9 lbs 2 oz, 21 inches long at 37 weeks.
"If we weren't all crazy we would go insane."
If I thought anything about Butterbrot's picture, it was that she was being protective of her daughter by covering her face with the book. Butterbrot, I hope you don't really leave!
WHAT? I have seen her cute photo 100 times and never ever saw anything nasty about it at all. I am sorry you are sad, but I think that majority of us just saw too adorable little kiddos reading a book.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I posted on the Don't Go thread and just wanted to add again that both DH and I thought your pic was adorable and NEVER saw anything other than two siblings reading together.
I posted on the Don't Go thread and just wanted to add again that both DH and I thought your pic was adorable and NEVER saw anything other than two siblings reading together.
What the actual fuxcks? Seriously, if you have a problem with that picture, maybe you should look in the mirror and decide what kind of person you are. I would have never ever thought that of that pic. Ugh people suck.
Re: FFFC cliff's notes?
...Oh and there was a bit towards the end about your photo contest entry this week potentially being a little risque.
I personally didn't/don't have an issue with her photo, but I was surprised it didn't get flack in the discussion thread.
I remember a while back Ateal posted an adorable picture of Eden and someone on her FB mentioned it looked like that scene from Titanic. People went on to talk about how thinking about baby in that way/purposefully taking pictures like that is gross. Not that Ateal was in the wrong, the person who defined her picture in that way was wrong!
Also the post the other day with the little girl wearing fishnets(I DO NOT think that was okay at all) brought up putting LO's in sexual poses/outfits/etc.
Between those two I am surprised.
It was some trashy looking mom holding up her baby in a two piece swimsuit with pink fishnets on. I don't know what you are talking about?
Also I am REALLY curious about the siggy pic you are referring to??? Is said person on our board??
If it's the pic I'm thinking of, teeny bopper in bra top, it was a pic of one of the Real Housewives mom with her kid, think the new jersey one. Someone just posted the pic on here
Butterbrot's? Her pic seems fine to me. Why is it, because you can see her daughter's panties?
Wow. Alright. I am done here, ladies. It's been great and all, but wow. No thanks.
I don't want to go down as an overly dramatic bish here; I know that most of you thought that, huahua. I thought it, too, obviously, otherwise I wouldn't have use the picture as my signature.
But when someone sexualizes my kid, it's time to say goodbye. This actually has me in tears, embarrassing as that is, because I really liked posting here. But I have to draw the line somewhere, and megoguen's comment was just too much.
Take care, bishes!
I once had a picture until the trolls showed up.
TTC #1 7/08 PCOS dx 8/28/04 Met 1000 mg and Clomid cycles 1-4 1/6/09-5/2/09 BFN
Clomid 100mg 6/4/09=O'd=BFP on 6/29/09! Beta@14DPO 70.8 Beta@16DPO 152. EDD 3/7/10.
First u/s on 7/13/09 @6w0d heard and saw heartbeat 102 bpm.
K M #1 arrived via c/s 3/1/10 10 lbs, 22 inches long at 39 weeks.
Surprise expecting #2. Med-free BFP on 8/1/11! Beta@15DPO 58.2 Beta@17DPO 198.3 Beta@23DPO 2338. EDD 4/9/12
K M #2 arrived via c/s 3/19/12 9 lbs 2 oz, 21 inches long at 37 weeks.
"If we weren't all crazy we would go insane."
This....I'm sorry!