Parenting

Dumbasss things to get banned by schools

 https://blogs.babble.com/strollerderby/2012/08/14/seriously-15-things-schools-have-banned-so-far-in-2012/

 

 

Gosh, we like to ban things.

In recent years, we?ve seen schools ban everything from Silly Bandz and skinny jeans, to dictionaries and saying the word ?meep.? (Memorable School Bans: 18 Things That Failed to Follow the Rules) But in 2012 alone, which isn?t even over yet by a long shot, at least 15 more things have been banned by schools.

Some of them, I agree with. For example, the ungodly amount of sugar consumed by my kids at school on Valentine?s Day. And I?ve got no problem with a ban on Ugg boots because a) those things are damn expensive and b) why would you want your feet to be sweaty all day at school? On the other hand, some of the bans seem way out of line. Sunblock? Hair bows?

And for God?s sake, what was that Texas school thinking when it banned a kindergartner with cerebral palsy from using her walker?

Check out 15 things that have banned in school so far this year. I wonder what the next few months will bring!

 

"We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch

image

 GIFSoup 

<a href

Re: Dumbasss things to get banned by schools

  • My jaw dropped at the 'upsetting words' ban. I remember reading about that poor little girl with cerebral palsy. They thought she should use a wheel chair instead. i'm sure they were worried about her falling and them getting sued. Confused

    And she was so proud of being able to walk so she could go to school. Broke my heart.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic BabyFruit Ticker
  • Loading the player...
  • Thank you for the laugh and for the reminder of why I do not want to send my kid to any of my local public school. Because Texas likes to ban stuff, like critical thinking because it might cause children to challenge their parents.
    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker


    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • Most of those are ridiculous.  I think most don't apply up here in Canada.  We are nut and "may contain nut" free up here, which is a pain, but understandable.  The only other thing I've seen his school "ban" is trash from food.  They make kids take home all the garbage from their lunches and snacks.  They do it to try to encourage parents to use reusable containers for food, which I would do anyhow. 

    They also ban perfumes and strong scents up here.  Oh, and you're not allowed to send in any food treats for birthdays or special events.  They suggest sending in special pencils or stickers instead.  I'm sure in the next 2 years before L goes to JK there will be more. 

    image image

    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • OK, some of these I "get". Whether I agree with them or not is a different story, but I can sort of see, on most, what the motivating factor is behind them. Even the whole milk one (preventing obesity, etc.). But who the heck is banning sunblock and how do they rationalize that one when the benefits of sunblock and increase risk of skin cancer, etc., is all over the news? My pedi is pretty laid back, but if there's one thing she's been very consistent is asking/reminding us about is using sunblock and/or bug spray on DS. The bug spray isn't too much of an issue, since we don't really have him out during dusk/prime mosquito time, but with his fair skin, you can bet I keep his supply of sunblock at daycare stocked up!
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • My highschool was so ghetto - everything that was banned was because it was, or was perceived to be, gang-related, from bandanas to starter jackets to dickey's clothing to wearing houseshoes - some of the things, I don't know if they ever even WERE "gang-related," or if someone just made it up.  Oh, and even though we could leave for lunch, we weren't allowed to bring cups back in from fast food places and such because people would put booze in them. Klassy.
    imageimage
  • Our DC will not apply sunblock- we must do it at home before we bring them in. They also consider it a medication. The only "medication" they ever agreed to "administer" has been diaper cream.

  • Wtaf? Why waste time on banning stupid sh?t?
    image

    image

    image
  • No high-fives, hugs, LOL, or upsetting words.  It's like we're trying to raise a generation of robots.

    Good find, Kit.  I'll start acclimating DS now.  Time out for using LOL.  No dessert for hugs.  And God help him if he gives a high-five.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Totally bogus. I mean, seriously. I'm totally going to try homeschooling because I can't even handle the insanity of public schools. At my SK's elementary school, they aren't allowed to have "gender" (how SD phrased it) school supplies. So, no pink pencils, flowery folders, Spider-man backpacks or what? I mean, where's the line there? It's stupid because they don't share the school supplies. I know in some places, you just have everyone buy the same stuff and then certain things get thrown in together for the year, but this is not the case here. SD's and SS's stuff stays in their desks, so who gives a rat's a$$? Next, they'll say all the kids need to use "gender-neutral" pronouns and put everyone in orange coveralls.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagemartha919:
    Totally bogus. I mean, seriously. I'm totally going to try homeschooling because I can't even handle the insanity of public schools. At my SK's elementary school, they aren't allowed to have "gender" (how SD phrased it) school supplies. So, no pink pencils, flowery folders, Spider-man backpacks or what? I mean, where's the line there? It's stupid because they don't share the school supplies. I know in some places, you just have everyone buy the same stuff and then certain things get thrown in together for the year, but this is not the case here. SD's and SS's stuff stays in their desks, so who gives a rat's a$$? Next, they'll say all the kids need to use "gender-neutral" pronouns and put everyone in orange coveralls.

    WTF, seriously?  Restricting gender is just as bad as imposing gender.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • That Lee Greenwood song IS pretty annoying.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Baby Birthday Ticker TickerImage and video hosting by TinyPic
  • hmp1hmp1 member
    imageJerseyMa27:

    Our DC will not apply sunblock- we must do it at home before we bring them in. They also consider it a medication. The only "medication" they ever agreed to "administer" has been diaper cream.

    Same here. The playground is covered/shaded so it never bothers me. But I do think not allowing a child that is perfectly capable of putting on their own sunblock when they are going on an all day field trip is crazy. What is the difference of having the kid put on sunblock and put on lotion?

    And hair bows, huh? 


    James Sawyer 12.3.10
    Leo Richard 9.20.12 
    image

  • imagehmp&mrj:
    imageJerseyMa27:

    Our DC will not apply sunblock- we must do it at home before we bring them in. They also consider it a medication. The only "medication" they ever agreed to "administer" has been diaper cream.

    Same here. The playground is covered/shaded so it never bothers me. But I do think not allowing a child that is perfectly capable of putting on their own sunblock when they are going on an all day field trip is crazy. What is the difference of having the kid put on sunblock and put on lotion?

    And hair bows, huh? 

    Sunblock is also supposed to be reapplied every couple of hours or so.

    "We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch

    image

     GIFSoup 

    <a href

  • imagehmp&mrj:
    imageJerseyMa27:

    Our DC will not apply sunblock- we must do it at home before we bring them in. They also consider it a medication. The only "medication" they ever agreed to "administer" has been diaper cream.

    Same here. The playground is covered/shaded so it never bothers me. But I do think not allowing a child that is perfectly capable of putting on their own sunblock when they are going on an all day field trip is crazy. What is the difference of having the kid put on sunblock and put on lotion?

    And hair bows, huh? 

    I think our DC just had us sign a waiver. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageStardust225:

    imagerabstbmom:
    OK, some of these I "get". Whether I agree with them or not is a different story, but I can sort of see, on most, what the motivating factor is behind them. Even the whole milk one (preventing obesity, etc.). But who the heck is banning sunblock and how do they rationalize that one when the benefits of sunblock and increase risk of skin cancer, etc., is all over the news? My pedi is pretty laid back, but if there's one thing she's been very consistent is asking/reminding us about is using sunblock and/or bug spray on DS. The bug spray isn't too much of an issue, since we don't really have him out during dusk/prime mosquito time, but with his fair skin, you can bet I keep his supply of sunblock at daycare stocked up!

    Sunblock ban is covering their asss. Potential lawsuits, inappropriate touching kind of stuff. 

    Oooh, gotcha. Yeah, didn't think of that. But if it were my kid's school, I think I'd reply with "Two words--spray-on sunblock." They don't even have to touch the kids. There is absolutely no excuse for anyone, much less little kids, coming home with burns as bad as what those photos show!

    But then again, you're talking to someone who is very fair skinned, and whose mom (from whom I get the fair skin) was warned by a doctor about her risk for skin cancer waaay back in the 60s before anyone was supposed to have known any better.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Ok so most of these i found funny and absolutely ridiculous. But here is my question. has anything been done about the A-holes who decided to ban that poor little girl from using her walker.. I'm pretty sure that is against the Americans with Disabilities act.. and grounds for a law suit! Either way whoever did that should be fired!
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageamber31288:
    Ok so most of these i found funny and absolutely ridiculous. But here is my question. has anything been done about the A-holes who decided to ban that poor little girl from using her walker.. I'm pretty sure that is against the Americans with Disabilities act.. and grounds for a law suit! Either way whoever did that should be fired!

    Technically not against ADA because she could get around with a wheelchair and they had access for both the walker and the wheelchair.

    I cannot find anything current, other than a teeny tiny blurb in a Toronto paper from last week.

    ETA: Found this.

    https://montgomerycountypolicereporter.com/?p=42470

    SNC

    "We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch

    image

     GIFSoup 

    <a href

  • I thought the list would be funnier. My school banned whatever the cool thing was a the time: snap bracelets, pogs, trapper keepers, tomagotchis, etc.


    image 

    image

    can't get the ticker to work, but I have two sons:

    Baby RJ, born 1/25/2014



    Formerly Twilightmv
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"