DH hates to think of his little boys being stuck with sissy names. He gives me the look when I mention Porter, Milo, Nolan, or Mason. None of which seem sissy to me (maybe not rugged like Jack or Michael, but not sissy, right?). So what do you think? What makes a boy name sissy?
Re: Sissy Boy Names?
I was just wondering about this the other day. Someone on a similar baby name forum asked for "strong" names. I had a few ideas but when I read the list that some others had put up it made me stop and think...
I guess it would come down to what kind of strengths are valued. I think Nolan and Milo are strong names. I see them as intelligent (almost a scholarly type). I like names like Ronan, Miles, Adrian (and Liam, my LO) paired with what I consider stable/salt of the earth type names; Warren, Robert, Louis, Roscoe, Leon). I know we can't know what our LO's will grow up to be but I think we still name them according to our taste and what we hope.
So, basically, what may indicate strength to one person may seem brutish according to one persons standard or sissy to anothers.
I can't get the ticker to work, but I have two sons:
Baby RJ, born 1/25/2014
Formerly Twilightmv
I don't think of Nolan or Mason as sissy names. In fact, I associate Nolan with Nolan Ryan (retired baseball player) who was definitely NOT a sissy.
Am I the only one who finds the concept of a 'sissy' name to be kind of offensive? Not every boy needs to have a name like Blade or Thor or Macho. You can be perfectly secure in your masculinity without having a name that sounds like a cartoon villain- not saying your examples of Jack and Michael fall into that category, but I definitely see people posting looking for those kinds of names.
This double standard just pisses me off. Boys can't have 'sissy' names, but let's give girls masculine names because anything feminine is bad- ugh.
ETA: I might be over-reacting to this specific post, but the concept in general pisses me off.
Nope, I'm right there with you. The OP's DH gets a big ole eye-roll for his fear of "sissy names". I bet Macho Jr. won't be allowed to play with no sissy dolls either.
No, I absolutely agree with you.
That's a simialr to what I am trying to say in my pp. There are planty of strong girl names and names for boys that don't scream MACHO that are still strong. I don't think I would categorize any name as "sissy" therefore, I can't classify what would make a name "sissy" as OP is asking.
btw LOVE Adrian.
You are not alone.
hahaha Seymour. Niiice.
I like Nolan and I like Mason. Although Mason DOES make me think of Kourtney Kardashian's baby.
******************************
Nov siggy challenge: animals eating Thanksgiving food
Rhys - born 04.17.2013
Harry - born 04.18.2016
I don't think any of your choices are sissy, but I don't really think there are sissy name per say. Some boy names that, in my opinion, end with an -a sound do have a more feminine sound. For example, I will probably never name my son Ezra or Micah.
I don't think they are sissy. I like Mason and Nolan!
I think sissy names are more like Tristan, Christian, or other names that could go for a girl or boy.
Mason is NMS, but it means bricklayer/ stonecutter, for goodness sake. What could be more rugged than that?
I definitely agree that the sissy terminology is troubling. It smacks of someone wanting to stamp out feminine qualities because of homophobic fears. Certainly, some names have a more feminine, less rugged quality to them-- I happen to like a lot of those names, but I could see how it wouldn't everyone's cup of tea (and in some cases-- Tristan comes to mind-- they're too extreme for my tastes as well). But I don't see any of the names you are listing as falling into that category.
My Ovulation Chart Simple Link: My Ovulation Chart
George Carlin did a whole bit on guys named Todd...
FWIW, I think names are subjective and associations are built based off personal experience and preferences. While I wouldn't necessarily use the term "sissy" to categorize the names mentioned, I do find names such as those mentioned by the OP to be in the trendier category, and less my style.
And for the poster that mentioned something about there being less girls with less feminine names because feminine names aren't desirable, I find that a little bit over the top and simply inconsistent with the current SSA data. Of the top 10, I would categorize all the girls names as "strictly feminine". How else would one categorize; Isabella, Sophia, Emma, Abigail, Ava, & Olivia?