I had my 28 week MFM growth scan today and both babies are measuring large. Baby A is estimated at 3.6 and B is 3.8. That's up from 2.4 and 2.0, respectively, four weeks ago and in the high 70s / low 80s for percentile.
The Dr told me I should "limit carbs, if that's something that you like to eat." What pregnant woman *doesn't* like carbs?
So now I'm wondering... what's the downside to having big babies? I thought we *wanted* them to be big. The only issue I can think of is if Baby B is bigger going into a vaginal birth, there might an issue if he goes breech. Am I missing something? If they keep gaining at this rate, my estimate has them at around 6 and a half pounds by 38 weeks. I'd be quite happy with that.
Also, I'm 5'11" and the donor we used is 6'2". That's gotta count for something... it's not just 7 pounds of "ice-cream" babies in there!
Re: Big babies
Meh. My doctor told me all along that I was going to have big babies. They were born full term NOT big. The estimates I had were WAY off. It happens a lot. That's just my 2 cents worth.
However limiting carbs can't really be a bad thing. I'm not sure that I really think it will slow down the growth of your babies this late in the game, though. Of course...I'm not a doctor or a dietician either, so there you go.
My babies are a little smaller then yours but not much at my 28 week on Monday A was 3.0 and B 2.12. My doc said keep doing what I am doing. It looks like with your hieight and Donor's hieght you are probly meant to have big babies... Congrats on doing such a good job growing them!
Tanya
I'm 5'10, DH is 6'0. My babies were born at 38+6, Baby A weighing (18.5" long) and Baby B weighing 6lb 15oz (20" long), so your babies sound right on track to me. I started at 155 and got up to 220, no diabetes or anything.