Community› The Bump Message Boards› Babies: 0 - 3 Months
Babies: 0 - 3 Months
New Discussion

Child predator

mommybliss4evermommybliss4ever
in Babies: 0 - 3 Months
I am also just trying to get the word out. One of the ladies who is a frequent poster here is married to a convicted child pornographer. He is a repeat offender. There is proof available for anyone who wants to see it. Please please watch the pictures you post of your precious babies. Please protect them. This person is a mother to twins born in May of this year.
Report Reply to Post

Re: Child predator

  • meliss008meliss008 member
    How do you know this?
    Report Reply
  • Loading the player...
  • ashleybrittonashleybritton member
    He is on the National sex offender registry. His picture and his offense is posted.

    12 dpo: HCG = 184 Progesterone = 34
    14 dpo: HCG = 529 Progesterone = 24.6
    My Blog
    Report Reply
  • dragossoul84dragossoul84 member
    Ya I would want to know where you were getting this information from. Its a pretty strong accusation to throw out there
    <a href="http://www.thebump.com/?utm_source=ticker&utm_medium=HTML&utm_campaign=tickers" title="Ovulation Calculator"><img src="http://global.thebump.com/tickers/tt17cf53.aspx" alt=" BabyFruit Ticker" border="0"  /></a>
    Report Reply
  • mommybliss4evermommybliss4ever

    EDITED BY MOD FOR VIOLATING TOS

    Report Reply
  • amoerizzleamoerizzle
    The above post was edited because "personal" information was given. The personal information given was just the a link to the person's Sex Offender Registry, which is public record that anyone can obtain. People should be given the facts, not sheltered from it, especially in a situation such as this. 
    Report Reply
  • AliciaS1411AliciaS1411 member

    imageamoerizzle:
    The above post was edited because "personal" information was given. The personal information given was just the a link to the person's Sex Offender Registry, which is public record that anyone can obtain. People should be given the facts, not sheltered from it, especially in a situation such as this. 

    The post included first and last names of the poster and her husband, and the link included their current address. It needed to be edited.  

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
    Report Reply
  • beavs109beavs109
    MommyBliss- YGPM
    Report Reply
  • Gismo123Gismo123 member
    imageAliciaS1411:

    imageamoerizzle:
    The above post was edited because "personal" information was given. The personal information given was just the a link to the person's Sex Offender Registry, which is public record that anyone can obtain. People should be given the facts, not sheltered from it, especially in a situation such as this. 

    The post included first and last names of the poster and her husband, and the link included their current address. It needed to be edited.  

    If it's on the sex offenders page then it's PUBLIC knowledge that anyone can get.  Megan's Law exists for a reason!

    Report Reply
  • SigirSigir member

    well, after reading the other threads on botb and June 2012, I see who it was.  I always wondered why that poster was such a nasty, bully b1tch on my bmb (June 2012)... I guess having a totally f-ed up home life is why she was so mean online.  She was a ringleader of nastiness and led to my decision to not actively post much there.    

    This def explains why she was that way!!!  I am sorry for those who got sucked in and donated!

    Report Reply
  • bigtex11bigtex11 member
    imageGismo123:
    imageAliciaS1411:

    imageamoerizzle:
    The above post was edited because "personal" information was given. The personal information given was just the a link to the person's Sex Offender Registry, which is public record that anyone can obtain. People should be given the facts, not sheltered from it, especially in a situation such as this. 

    The post included first and last names of the poster and her husband, and the link included their current address. It needed to be edited.  

    If it's on the sex offenders page then it's PUBLIC knowledge that anyone can get.  Megan's Law exists for a reason!

     HUGE 2nd!!!

    Report Reply
  • morethancottoncandymorethancottoncandy
    imageSigir:

    well, after reading the other threads on botb and June 2012, I see who it was.  I always wondered why that poster was such a nasty, bully b1tch on my bmb (June 2012)... I guess having a totally f-ed up home life is why she was so mean online.  She was a ringleader of nastiness and led to my decision to not actively post much there.    

    This def explains why she was that way!!!  I am sorry for those who got sucked in and donated!

    I agree.  She was a whack job and a total biitch on the tri boards.  There was another post that stands out from waaaayyy back about somebody that was flamed on ML on TN.  It was bad.   

    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers BabyFruit Ticker
    Report Reply
  • IDreamInPinkIDreamInPink
    imageSigir:

    well, after reading the other threads on botb and June 2012, I see who it was.  I always wondered why that poster was such a nasty, bully b1tch on my bmb (June 2012)... I guess having a totally f-ed up home life is why she was so mean online.  She was a ringleader of nastiness and led to my decision to not actively post much there.    

    This def explains why she was that way!!!  I am sorry for those who got sucked in and donated!

     HELLO!! I said the EXACT same thing as I read all that drama!! I was on the June board from the very beginning, and always thought she was such a royal b!tch to everyone. Makes a lot of sense now! I even quit getting on that board around 26 weeks pregnant because I was so sick of her attitude towards everyone. 

     

    Hmm, misery doesn't even look good on people on the Internet....... 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
    Report Reply
  • tartarugatartaruga member
    I'm a little curious as to how posting a picture of your child on this board is going to put them in danger from another poster's husband who may or may not be a sex offender and who is probably not even in the same state.
    image
    Report Reply
  • bogus123bogus123 member
    imagetartaruga:
    I'm a little curious as to how posting a picture of your child on this board is going to put them in danger from another poster's husband who may or may not be a sex offender and who is probably not even in the same state.
    It isn't that they are in danger, but I still don't want a man that was convicted TWICE for being in possession of child pornography (the ages of the children found on his computer were 2-13) able to have access to any pictures of any child. It's just uncomfortable and doesn't sit well with many people.
    Report Reply
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"