My daughter has recently grown out of her baby carrier. We got her a new carset that is rear facing AND forward facing. I have learned that we should keep her rear facing until 2 years old now. My delima is that we installed the new seat (rear faced) but her feet still hit the back of the seat. it was my understanding that once their feet touch the seat, it is 1) uncomfortable for them but mainly 2) unsafe, bc they can push against the seat, lifting them from their carseat. Anyway.....what do i do?
Re: rear face vs forward facing?
My LO is quite short so the feet thing isn't an issue for us, but my niece is very tall for her age, and she used to cross her feet "criss cross apple sauce" style until my sister turned her seat around from her outgrowing the height restrictions.
DD1 Feb 2010
DD2 Sept 2011
Internal decapitation vs some bent knees.
Watch this video and make your decision.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fak6R_K6_YQ
Great video -- well great video to show how much safer it is to extended rear face.
I would never turn a child FF before 2. If something (god forbid) were to happen I would never forgive myself. I don't care if DS is pissed or uncomfortable, his safety comes first.
Thanks for sharing! Very powerful.
This, also.... if they are able to push themselves up out of their seat, then they are not buckled in tight enough IMO.
DD is less than 2 months away from her 3rd birthday and still RF-ing. Her legs constantly kick the back of the seat and I couldn't care less. She hasn't had any problems RF-ing and even if she did I don't really care. I'm the parent and it's my job to determine what's safe and follow it.
I've hard past arguments (not on this post) about how uncomfortable it must be having to sit cross-legged in a carseat and that's just a bunch of BS. A toddler's flexibility is way better than an adult's. As an adult we can't imagine it being very comfortable but then again we can't remember how flexible we were back then. OP, there are some things in life you can't control or fully control when it comes to your child's safety. This isn't one of those things. You have full control over how safe you want to keep your child while in the car. Keep LO RF-ing until the recommended age and longer, if possible.
Do the research. It is neither unsafe NOR uncomfortable for baby's feet to touch the chair. I have seen 3 year olds with their legs crossed, and they are comfortable.
The reason for the new recommendation of AT LEAST 2 (the law is still 1) is because until 2+, babies spinal cords are longer than their spinal column. If you are in an accident, it doesn't take much power to SNAP their spinal cord (resulting in internal decapitation and paralysis or death).
Once again, do the research. The consequences are terrible.
My Ovulation Chart
My DS will be 2 next week, and we have no immediate plans to turn him forward facing. His feet definitely tough the seat and more so in some other seats. Ex: We have a Boulevard 70 and he puts his legs up on the seat. I just picked up a crashed True Fit for recycling and put it in my car to see how much leg room he had.... he had a TON more than he does in his Britax. Unfortunately, I don't know if it would be worth it to sell my current seat and get a TF because it has 35lb rear-facing limit, and I think he might be close to that.
Also, if they can really move the seat a lot by pushing on the back seat, then you probably need to have to seat checked.
No, no, no, and no. Please keep your child rear-facing for as long as possible. I would so much rather have to put my daughter in a cast for a broken leg than bury her because of a broken neck.
Do the research and lots of it. Google internal decapitation in infants/toddlers. Spend some time on youtube watching memorial videos from parents that lost their babies over something as simple as having the carseat facing the wrong way.
They have the rest of their lives to sit forward-facing, keep them rear-facing as long as possible.
Fastest year of my life.