How does it compare to natural contractions? Is the pain worse, not as bad, or just different? Or does nothing really feel different? I really don't want any sort of induction/augmentation, and it's not routine with my MW, but I would still like to know how the pain compares. Everyone agrees Pit's worse, but there seems to be little info on Cytotec. TIA.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Re: If you have had Misoprostol/Cytotec....
Married my love 6/11/11 | MMC 10/11/11 | Eliza Frances born 9/18/12 | Rhett Garland born 2/24/14
This is my understanding as well. It's discussed in Ina May Gaskin's book and, no matter the bias, it scared me enough to not want it.
I also went with cervadil and was lucky enough to go into labor while it was inserted. My mw warned me the contractions may stop when it was removed, but they didn't. I believe they were a pretty natural progression.
And the company has sent out letters telling OBs not to use it. No way is it coming anywhere near me!
This is why I asked. This is the experience I had @ about 9 weeks pregnant several years ago and wanted to know if labor will be anything like that. I'm not stupid, I'm actually medically educated myself, this is just my only experience with any kind of labor. I was young and unaware of what Cytotec was, and do not want it again, now that I know what I do.
No, I've never had Pit. I was wondering how the cramping/contractions relate to true labor pain. When I was given Cytotec, the cramping was terrible. I was also terrified and alone, so that didn't help. Since that was my only experience with any sort of labor-type pain, I was wondering how it relates. Is Cytotec worse, easier, or just different?