Which did you have (or going to have) and why? I would love to hear your experiences. Both frighten me a lot but I'm almost 41 and would rather be prepared than surprised.

06.10.12 +HPT 06.12.12 Beta #1 = 2,770 06.14.12 Beta #2 = 6,300
1st U/S 06.18.12 2nd U/S 06.25.12
09.24.12 It's a Boy!! ---> Jacob Owen
Our IF Journey Began: October 2009
**8 Failed IUI's, 1 Blighted Ovum, & 1 Failed IVF**
Dx: MFI, DOR w/MTHFR Homozygous A1298C & Hypothyroidism
03.2012 Lab Results: FSH 6.83 AMH 0.67 TSH 3.8 E2 17
SA 156 million 93% motility 3% morphology

**~PAIF/SAIF Always Welcome~**
Re: CVS vs. Amnio
I had a CVS because 1) the perinatal center at which I had it done was very experienced; 2) I am a need-to-know-for-sure person, and percentage chances weren't going to do it for me; 3) I knew I would terminate in the face of a serious chromosomal abnormality, and therefore I wanted to know sooner rather than later, since with an amnio one can already be starting to show and even feel the baby move before results come back -- which would have made it even more awful if the results weren't good. I was very anxious about the CVS but in fact experienced no complications, not even cramping, afterwards. And it was wonderful to know for sure that everything was fine by only 14 weeks. Best of luck making your decision!
I had good results from the NT and the MaternT21 so I didn't feel the CVS was warranted. I have yet to do the second round of testing so fingers crossed.
Knowing early would be a big postive for me but as I understand it the Amnio tests for a few more issues than the CVS so I'd probably hold off. Its a tough choice either way but good to have options.
All of this, except I did experience cramping and I'm currently waiting for my results.
I personally think it all depends on what your plan would be if there was an abnormality. We did not want to wait for the amnio, for us it was too far along.
One thing I should have mentioned in my previous post is that they all test for different things and I would make sure to visit a genetic counselor before making a decision either way. I was scheduled for the quad scan, but had the CVS after meeting with the GC because I wasn't going to get the answers I wanted.
I don't think it is fair to compare an quad scan to either amnio or CVS because both of the latter tests are far more comprehensive.
My Blog




I am 37, and had the cvs test last week due to my last pregnancy being very stressful with several markers showing up at my big ultrasound. The cvs was super easy, like a longer pap test. I had no bleeding or discomfort after. I did ask about the maternit21 test, but was told that at this time, it is considered to be screening not diagnostic. If anything weird came up at the ultrasound later, i'd still be asked to do an amnio even if the maternit21 test came back negative. So, that made it seem really unattractive as I am trying to eliminate stress and worry! I also had an amnio my last pregnancy, and I found it to be more stressful and uncomfortable. Both tests have a 1 in 1000 loss rate at my hospital. Good
Luck, I think both tests are way easier than most people think and it is great to relax with good results!
If we had gotten unfavorable odds with the first trimester blood draw combined with NT scan, DH and I would have done the CVS so we would have the option to terminate. We were fortunateto not need that route, but the CVS and Amnio both give definite DNA results where as the quad screen,NT scan, and the integrated screening are just odds.
If you don't think you would wish to terminate either way, the amnio has a slightly lower risk of miscarriage (both are still less than 1%), but you would have to wait until the 2nd trimester for it.
I would talk to the geneticists to help you make a decision.