I didn't want to take up other people sharing their stories in the other thread.
I'm really glad you're just having a baby and not caring for someone having one because you are incorrect. You CAN release an egg that winds up in the other tube. You do understand that your tube is not connected to your ovaries, correct? The tubes float near the ovaries and during ovulation, there are little bits that send out "signals" to draw the egg to it.. basically the tube tries to seduce the egg to come inside of it.
Yes - My doctor's DID say to me that I ovulated from the left and it went down the right and how rare this is. I had nurses coming into my appointments hugging me, insanely excited, because they all know what I have been going through and feel that if this insane thing was going to happen to anyone - it deserved to happen to me. We did not ASSUME anything, I had very regular monitoring appointments and we tracked the follicular growth on both ovaries. I did not have measurable follicles on the right prior to ovulation, and did not have any corpus luteum cysts (basically the eggshell left behind after ovulation that produces progesterone and should go away by the time your period comes) on the right - everything signifying ovulation was on the left side.
From https://www.ectopic.org.uk/index.php/patients/emotional-impact/life-ectopic-pregnancy-faqs/
Even when a tube has been removed it is usual to leave the ovaries alone. Both ovaries compete each month to produce an egg and usually the one that is pulling ahead in the race continues while the other one gives up (but not always ? sometimes women will ovulate from both ovaries in one cycle or twice from one ovary but these are rare events ? they do explain how we get non-identical twins so there is no disputing it can happen).
We do not fully understand the process of ovulation and we make discoveries about it all the time, most latterly that the tubes and uterus are lined with little receptor cells. It appears that at the point of ovulation these receptor cells are sent a chemical signal which literally ?switches? them on and they emit a signal that attracts a similar receptor in the egg and in the sperm to come and meet in the same place, ie the fallopian tube.
When we ovulate, although the egg is most likely to travel down the nearest tube, there is some evidence to suggest this is not always the case. At the point of ovulation some very delicate structures called the fimbriae begin to move gently creating a slight vacuum to suck the egg toward the end of the tube it is nearest to. So, if you have only one tube then there is only one set of receptors working and one set of fimbriae creating a vacuum and so the egg is much more likely to find its way to that tube, whichever ovary it is produced from.
Conservative estimates suggest that an egg produced on the tubeless side manages to descend the remaining tube around 15 to 20% of the time.
This means that rather than your fertility being halved ? your fertility is probably no different to what it was before your ectopic ? assuming fertility is the ability to produce a fertilisable egg and or quality sperm. If you can do this before ectopic you can almost certainly do it after ectopic, so rather than a reduction of fertility, it is more the case that the opportunity to conceive has been affected but not by half ? by around 30%. Or looking at it another way, it means we have around a 70% opportunity of conception with each cycle, so it?s not all bad news at all!
SO - in conclusion - you are incorrect. It is not impossible for an egg to wind up in the other tube. My right ovary did not spontaneously release eggs, my doctors did not lie to me - I have ovulated from my left ovary and the egg went through the right tube.



Re: Angel0423 RE:Tubes, ectopic pregnancies, and more!
PS, I can't wait to meet the miracle baby!
Your "Most Informative" badge is well deserved!
GL
TTC since June 2010.
DX hypothyroidism, pituitary hyperfunction, and PCOS.
On med/treatment break indefinitely. Not currently trying.
Lots of love to all of my Golden Girls!
The Vagtastic Voyage
::The sudden disappointment of a hope leaves a scar that even the ultimate fullfillment of that hope cannot fully erase:: Thomas Hardy
BFP1: DD1 born April 2011 at 34w1d via unplanned c/s due to HELLP, DVT 1 week PP
BFP3: DD2 born Feb 2013 at 38w4d via unplanned RCS due to uterine dehiscence
Super excited that Shay is on the same BMB as me! I think I will be learning quite a bit from her the next 7 or so months
Excellent explanation, and what an amazing story!
M/C 7/8/12
Perfect baby boy born 7/8/13
BFP 8/20/14 EDD 4/27/15 It's a GIRL!!
Agreed! I have learned a lot from you Shay. Keep on rockin' it.
my blog :: the domestic wannabe
Good luck! Definitely worthy of the most informative award!
W : 01.11.13
#3 : due 11.02.15
That's all you have to say to this after going on and on and on in posts about how what I said wasn't possible by any means?
I thought with all your big talk in the other thread, you would argue back with me here on how I am incorrect. You didn't just reply to their scenarios, you assumed your own scenarios and experience.
Here, I'll break it down for you.
^ Not going to stick by this being anatomically impossible and that your internet guess is I ovulated from the right?
^again, you assuming that I ovulated on the right and am just mistaken. You wanted to know, and now I told you. And all you had to say was a condescending"sorry if you were offended"
Once more with your condescending and assumptions. Believe me, I am not offended or care what you think about my pregnancy. But I refuse to let you sit here and say that this is impossible to happen. Some people cling to the hope that their egg will go to their only open tube every month - not about to let your ignorance crush that for them.
You may have medical background - but like you said, you are not an OB, nor are you a gynecologist, nor are you a reproductive endocrinologist. I suggest you keep your "facts" to the areas you did study and admit you were incorrect here.
Like I said in the other post you gave a great explanation of how this actually happened. I am not challenging you. I am not continuing to say its not possible. And I did not put my credentials out there to prove any type of point. It was just because I was asked. I am not a reproductive specialist and I respect the difficulties that you have gone through. You keep pointing out my assumptions, which I admitted were assumptions. With limited information you can only assume. My assumptions were incorrect. I am ok with that. It is my personality to challenge what (I think) is incorrect. I see our personalities clash and I apologize if you feel like I was debating your pregnancy. Just questioning the science. I meant no harm.
The only Easter Bunny I can get behind.
Maxwell Joseph 4/09 Lucy Violet 10/12
Not that I need an apology, but you do realize that starting off your apology with "I apologize if YOU feel.." is condescending, right? An apology would have been "I'm sorry I.." or "I apologize if I.."
You didn't just question the science - you made statements that were false. The statements you made about eggs ONLY going to their tube and such had nothing to do with what information I put out there, detail or no detail, you posted false information. I'm not sure what other information in my OP would have made you magically believe it - I was pretty clear with how I was monitored and we confirmed multiple times that the follicle was only on the left.
Again, I don't care if you think my right side ninja'd an egg or that my tube magically grew itself back to catch this one, whatever - I wanted to make it known that the statements you made were incorrect in relation to ovulation, follicles, and fallopian tubes and for you to admit that you were wrong.
I apologize for coming off as condescending as that was not my intent. Sorry for the wording of my apology? But I was making an attempt to apologize for what i actually felt like the issue was. I thought i made you feel like i was challenging your mircle through debate. And i wanted to clearly state that i did not intend for that to be the case. I accept your very thorough explanation, so no nijna kicking or tubal regeneration is being assumed. I obviously unknowingly made statements that were false. Not maliciously.
You are not allowed to say what you are sorry for when you apologize? Is this a new rule? I give up.
Did you even read this! " I apologize for coming off as condescending as that was not my intent. Sorry for the wording of my apology? But I was making an attempt to apologize for what i actually felt like the issue was. I thought i made you feel like i was challenging your mircle through debate. And i wanted to clearly state that i did not intend for that to be the case. I accept your very thorough explanation, so no nijna kicking or tubal regeneration is being assumed. I obviously unknowingly made statements that were false. Not maliciously. "
Point proved
I'm late to this and lurking.
A) Shay, you rock and I'm so excited for you!
A real apology is simply this: "I was wrong. I am sorry." Voila.
Formerly Otter*Pop
Dx=Severe MFI IVF#1 with ICSI=BFP!
Lots of love and luck to my TTGP IVF Buddy Kathy4678!
Yep! Love you Shay!!
BFP #1:10/31/10 DS born 6/22/11BFP #3:4/24/12 DD born 12/31/12
Henry Cavill...You're welcome!
BFP #3: EDD 1/10/13 **DS born 12/30/12!!!**
BFP #2: MC 7/2/11 @ 12 weeks
**Missing our February '12 LoveBug**
BFP #1: MMC discovered on 12/6/10
There, I fixed it for you, Angel0423.
3/12 150mg Clomid + B2B IUI =BFP!! TWINS!
Vanishing twin at week 6
Tater-tot born January 3rd 2013
2 IUI's in 2016- BFN
3 IUI's in 2017- BFN
8/17 IUI BFP!!!!!!!!
Yes???? Is that all you have to contribute?
BFP #1:10/31/10 DS born 6/22/11BFP #3:4/24/12 DD born 12/31/12