Mine was NOT! With DS, my water broke at about 2am, I started having contractions about an hour later and we left for the hospital at around 7am. I finally got the epi around noon and delivered DS at 9:30 at night. It was a long day with a lot of waiting in between.
This time, I felt my first contraction at 3:50pm and they progressed VERY quickly. I got to the hospital an hour later and literally had my LO in my arms at 5:19. No time for an epi, no time to even hook up the fetal monitor, and no time to call our parents to say we were on our way to the hospital. The OB on call literally made it into the room to catch the baby as she came out.
That one was a little too close for comfort. Literally.
Re: For those with outside babies - was labour what you expected?
I can't get the ticker to work, but I have two sons:
Baby RJ, born 1/25/2014
Formerly Twilightmv
I just delivered about 14 hours ago. I didn't know what to expect, so to answer your, no it want what I had expected. It was horribly painful until I got my epi. After that, it was smooth sailing. I pushed my 8.39 lb baby out in 26 minutes. It was GREAT! Definitely not what I expected!
Not what I expected. I thought I would be numb from the epi during the entire thing but my doc said I needed to feel the contractions to push effectively. Pushing him out was the hardest thing I have ever done and I felt all the pain.
Also I did not expect the hormone crash after delivery. I was a sobbing mess up until a few days ago. Everything was making me cry. It's getting a lot better now though.
Lurker here. I just had my baby yesterday and it was so much better. I went fast labor started at midnight. My contractions picked up at 3:30am to every 5 mins i tried to wait home for as long as possible. I went to the hospital at 5 am. I had my water manually broken at around 9:30 am and then I gave birth naturally at 9:47 am.
We went to the hospital right after my water broke because we knew we didn't have much time.
This labour was definitely different...I had very strong but irregular contractions, and I never felt the transition that everyone talks about. I had painful contractions, then about five really strong ones, then my body was pushing her out with no break in between. No transition, just all GO-GO-GO! I definitely appreciate the recovery after a med-free labour, though!
claudia poirier
Little Dude: 16 Apr. 2009 | Little Doll: 10 Jun. 2012
It was miserable but only because I had a bad reaction to meds. It didnt hurt as bad as I thought it would. And pushing was exhausting but not painful.
I was really surprised how much worse healing was than the actual labor.
Exactly! Everybody warns you about labor, but no one warns you about recovery.
This was my second labor and it went better than expected. I was able to go med free again and was really in no/very little pain until the very end (9-10 cm and pushing-ow). Because I went to the hospital so much sooner this time, I was able to labor in a much more controlled way. The only part that stunk was that I had high BP spikes and they put me on magnesium for 24 hours which makes you feel pretty crappy. Other than that it was great.
Recovery is going better than it did with DS, but it is still worse than labor in my opinion.
I had to be induced at 38w5d due to pre-e, so the start of labour was not what I expected at all. But I was able to labour naturally after my induction so I did get what I wanted out of my labour experience.
I didn't really know what to expect, but it my speedy dilation from transition to outside baby was definitely the most intense experience of my life. Still today, I dont think I could describe it!! I think it honestly hurt more than I expected to, but Im not really sure what I was expecting...