While DH and I were engaged, his cousin and cousin's wife got pregnant. We were all hanging out at a family reunion one day, and my MIL asked me which name we would like to use one day. I said, "We don't have a name for a girl, but our boy name is Davis, with DH's first name being the MN." Cousin's wife must have overheard, because then she turned around, smiled, and walked away.
Next thing we know, his
cousin and his wife have decided on the name Davis, with HER dh's first
name as the MN. Anyway, it turned into a little bit of a fight between
my MIL and the cousins. They ended up having a boy, and using the name
anyway. (They also ended up admitting they got the idea from us- who knows if they'd admit it now though!)
Now that we are pregnant again, we still really love the name Davis if we have a boy. It is not just about the name, but also about the meaning, what it means to our religion (which they are not), etc.
Would it be too weird to have two cousins with the same name? We live 5 hours away from them, but would see them once or twice a year at reunions. What do you think? I feel like it was our suggestion in the first place (thanks MIL!), so we should not be ashamed. I don't care if our kids have the same name, I just don't want to look like copy cats.
What do you think?
Re: Same name within the family?
Ditto. I would.
I don't think that it is weird, then again I have 2 cousins named Christopher, 2 Christy's (1 with a K), and a Christina. Also there are 3 Michales. (My name is Nancy so I don't fit into the exact topic...I don't think I've meet anyone my age(26) with my name).
I wouldn't have a problem using the same or a similar name as one of my relatives....I mean it isn't like I invented a name on the spot and have a patent on it. I think fighting over the use of a name is ridiculous.
Just take it as a compliment that she liked your idea and know that it has a special meaning to you no matter what anyone else says.
Davis is OUR boy name too! LOL.
Use it.
I wouldn't personally only because I'm one for unique names anyway. I personally would prefer a name that is different from everyones name, and for sure different than a cousin's name. While I was pregnant with DS my grandfather who my sister and I were both very close to, passed away 2 weeks before he was born. I mentioned to my sister that if we had a little girl next she would be getting my grandfather's name, Lacey (Boys had girls names a lot back then). She said that she was also thinking about it, and it was a discussion we both had because neither of us wanted our kids to have even the same middle name. It came down to the fact that she has already named her other two kids our mom and dad's name so I got my grandfather's name. My point being as much as I love my grandfather if my sister wanted it bad enough she could have used it and I would not have, even in a middle name situation.
With that being said it's entirely up to you, I don't think there is some rule against it, just personal preference. :-)
Isn't Davis a more unusual name for a first name anyway? We have a common last name, that's why we cannot go with Jacob, Joshua, Michael, etc. We are intentionally looking for slightly less common first name that is still meaningful to our family and religion. It's quite a bill to fit. Ha. I guess that's why we are so frustrated that we have tried and tried to find "the name" and then.... stolen.
We're picking out names right now and one of our top girl choices is DH's second cousin's daughter's name. Since we only see them once a year, we decided we don't care if they have the same name. Plus they'll have different last names at least.