Unlurking myself to ask your opinion on the NCP helping to pay for extracurricular activities.
BM is demanding my DH pay for SS1 (10) club Sport1 this season. I do not think that we should be paying for this activity though as DH already pays BM almost $2000/month in CS, and that is supposed to cover normal childhood costs and extracurricular activities per the CO. Her reasoning is that because ?she pays? for SS1 and SS2 (7.5) to play Sport2 that DH should pay for club Sport1. I?ll add that she did not consult DH before enrolling both boys in Sport2 ~3 years ago, and even after DH voiced his disagreement with putting them in that sport at all, she continued. I should also mention that should SS1 make the team for Sport2 this year, Sport1 is the defacto secondary sport in her opinion (e.g. Sport2 games trump Sport1 games, and if there is a conflict then the Sport1 game would be missed.) I?m positive he will make the Sport2 team, and he will end up playing hardly any of Sport1 this season, and our money will completely go to waste.
I think if she wants SS1 to play both sports so badly, she should pay for it using the CS she gets every month ? that is what it?s for. But she says she is stretched too thin and DH must pick up the slack or SS1 won't play Sport1, even though BM recently finished building a swimming pool in her backyard. Are you kidding me?!
DH and I are talking about TTC (possibly a different post sometime), and we are finally getting back on track after a year and a half of struggling with his unemployment and underemployment - I'll add that CS was paid on time, every time while we went through this. Is it wrong to draw the line at just paying the CS every month (plus half of medical expenses when they occur as stipulated in the CO)? He is leaning toward paying for Sport1, and I say no. When does the family we are talking about starting and saving for take precedence over satisfying her demands and apparent inability to budget her money? Sure, she can build a pool that we help pay for I'm sure, and then also she can make us pay extra for something that is supposed to be covered by the CS already?! No, thank you.
I feel like she views us as her overflow bank that she thinks she can just cash in on any time she feels like it. I don?t want to cater to those whims. Am I wrong here?
Re: NCP and Extra-curricular Activities
Created by MyFitnessPal - Free Weight Loss Tools
you are probably going to get mixed reviews on this, but IMO if he is already paying a lot in CS (which he is) and even managed to pay when he was unemployed, you are not obligated to pay. yes, it would be nice if he could pay if he has some extra $$ but if you are having to make big financial changes in order to do it- no way. plus, its not like he isn't playing a sport anyway.
is it possible BM is just trying to see if she can get it out of DH? and regardless of if he pays half or not she will sign him up anyway?
I agree with you- your DH pays a lot already. if DH wants to pay for SS to play a sport at his house when he is visiting with DH thats something completely different.
The way I have read is that any "extraordiany" expenses would be considered in child support. I always viewed that as private school, tutoring, summer camp type stuff? And as far as agreeing to these things I think a judge would figure in what seems reasonable. He can't deny his kids opportunities to save money for his future children who aren't even born yet.
I don't know how much sports are as my son is not in them yet. But if this went to court I would think a judge might include it under "extraordinary" expenses and it would be factored into the cs. I don't think your ex should pay for the full amount but in the interest of goodwill maybe he should voluntarily pay for half of the uniform or whatever the money is for.
I'm sorry to say but you sound a bit immature and spoiled. I won't judge you for that though because I've been there and done that. What I learned is that those kids will come first until they at least turn 18. Your family and your bio kids together will get whatever is left after that cs is paid. If your H doesn't help those kids with sports, etc their mom will make sure to let them know how little dad is helping and the kids will likely get pissy. That was my experience. And something you will just have to accept.
Actually, a lot of Judges would say "if you can't afford it on your own and Dad has already said 'no', then don't sign them up". Also, OP already said that it's stated in the CO the CS covers extracurriculars. And how is OP the selfish one? BM had the money to build a swimming pool but now can't put the money together for the kids to play sports? That seems pretty selfish and spoiled.
Created by MyFitnessPal - Free Weight Loss Tools
This, but if he was unemployed or has a different job now, you should do modify the amount he is paying in CS. It is a worksheet you fill out, you really don't even need to use your lawyer.
The way we do it is whomever signs them up pays. I pay all of DD's band, girl scout, sports, ect. because I sign her up. If her BD wanted to sign her up for something, I would expect him to pay. BM pays for my SK's sport costs because she signs them up. I also pay for SD's girl scout trips/camps, ect because I signed her up for scouts.
We don't pay any CS for my two skids (knock on wood!), so I can't relate to that. But as far as kids activities go; we check with BM and she with us when the activities are long-term like gymastics for 10 weeks, etc. If we all agree, we split the tuition in half but purchase our own uniform, shoes, leotard, etc. (that way we don't have to worry about the kids losing or forgetting anything at her house) If she signed one of them up for something like that without checking with us, I'd be against helping pay for it and I'd hope DH would too (especially if we couldn't afford it)!
It sounds like your BM is the one pushing this second sport, so she can take care of paying for it. Just make sure she knows that in the future you expect her to check with you BEFORE signing them up for anything!!
I agree with this. At least here CS is calculated by how much the person earns so if he pays more it's because he was earning more. (if that changed then he should ask them to re-calculate it)
I agree that if sports/activities are supposed to be covered by CS (as stated in a CO) then he shouldn't have to pay unless he wants to and can afford to.
My response is strictly based on the fact you stated that cs has extracurricular activities factored into the amount of cs is to be paid monthly. The other factors you mentioned like the pool, I didn't even consider.
BFP #1 11/07/2012 EDD 07/09/2013 M/C 11/22/2012
BFP #2 02/05/2013 EDD 09/19/2013 Arrived via c-section 09/27/2013
BM can demand all she wants - if the CO states that extracurriculars are included in child support, demanding ain't getting!
For me, it would boil down to what is the significance of Sport 1 in SS's life. I'm a little confused, and I think the two sports have become a pissing match for BM and your H. If Sport1 is what your H wants him to play (or be able to play) and BM's not going to pay for it - would your H be ok with SS not playing Sport1? Would SS be ok with not playing Sport1?
If my child had a passion for a sport and it came down to me paying or my child not participating, I'd cough up the money, even if that meant someone else was "getting their way" or "taking advantage of me." I'd rather that my child be happy than being a "winner" in a fight with another parent.
As DD is getting closer to middle school, I am seeing more and more kids being directed by their parents on what sports / activities / instruments to play (or don't play), and IMO it is just sad! Let the kids choose what they want!
MyFitnessPal - Free Calorie Counter
"Karma1969: If baking someone a birthday pie/cake is romantic, I must be a slut."
This is untrue. Certain states (mine included), calculate child support based upon GROSS income, not net. DH pays CS in an amount which is MORE than one paycheck per month. Granted, I know this is not the case in every state, but it is in some.
His CS is MORE than one, net check.