I just read this article on TIME: https://healthland.time.com/2012/05/23/are-vaccines-safe-a-major-media-outlets-specious-story-fans-the-debate/#ixzz1vhHqvA7X
and was kind of shocked at this paragraph:
?Discovery took down the article tonight = good things happen when smart people band together to support science!? e-mailed Amy Pisani, executive director of Every Child by Two, a vaccine-advocacy organization that learned about the article from a group of mothers who practice attachment parenting (the subject of TIME magazine?s ?bercontroversial cover story earlier this month). The mothers, according to Pisani, were shunned from their online attachment-parenting group because they vaccinated their children."
First of all, what does it have to do with the article at all?
Secondly, have you ever heard of an AP group being so anti-vax that they would "shun" parents from the group? I actually think most people, esp here, are pro-vax, and in the other AP groups I am in it's not even an issue. In fact, I don't think it's ever been brought up, except once when someone wanted a pedi referral who was fine with an alt. schedule.
Like I said in the title, it leads me to believe someone at TIME is uber-anti-AP.
Re: I think TIME mag is anti-AP
Speaking of the TIME article have you seen the great interviews with the AP moms featured in it over at kellymom?
https://kellymom.com/blog-post/time-apmoms-interview/
Great article! Thanks for sharing