My original plan was to have a natural birth. I've been diagnosed with GD and will be induced at 39 weeks if LO doesn't come before. I'm so frustrated that my idea for a natural birth is being thrown out the window before it even happens. I'm SO hoping that LO comes prior to needing an induction.
Did any of you have GD and still able to go natural?
Re: Feel like my birth plan got thrown right out the window
FYI, getting induced for GD does not necessarily have to do with size of the baby. Having extra glucose in your system stresses the placenta more and makes it deteriorate faster. If you are careful about what you eat and your blood sugar numbers are fine, you should be able to hold off and go natural. If you need insulin to control your blood sugar, they'll be more concerned about how well your placenta is functioning.
I'm not knocking NB; I've got GD and I'm hoping to go natural myself, but I just wanted to make you aware that there is a legitimate medical reason behind being induced with GD and that it's not "the baby is too big", even though your risk of shoulder dystocia does go up as well when you have GD.
The Princess of Anything is Coming!
Had a dream I was queen.
Woke up. Still queen.
I personally feel that such decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis as opposed to routine (e.g., always inducing GD moms at 39 weeks). As long as your sugars are diet and exercise controlled and you are not on medication, can you suggest that you'd like more intense monitoring during those days after 39 weeks instead of the induction? They can do U/S and NSTs to check size of baby, placental function and fluid levels. Of course if anything seems off you can still be induced. I went to 41w1d with my GD pregnancy and delivered a very healthy 8lb. baby. Good luck!
EDD June 25
My three little ones
Yes. GD does not mean you cannot go natural.
I would revisit the induction date. Why 39 weeks? You might consider it at 41 weeks, you might not.
I was induced for other medical reasons, not GD, just 2 days before my due date, and went without any pain meds. I had cervadil for 12 hours, made a teensy tiny bit of progress with that, and they started pit, low and slow at my request. A few hours in, contractions got going pretty good, and with about 4-5 hours of "real" contractions that I had to breath through (and that, in the moment of transition, made me think I hate everyone and I'm never having another baby), she was born. THis is my first, so I can't compare to labor without pitocin, but it is definitely doable if you prepare yourself for it.
Definitely keep talking to your doctor about the need for induction, what you can do to stay healthy and minimize risk, as well as your options if induction does end up being necessary.
I had GD that was diet/exercise controlled. I ended up being induced after my water began to leak and labor didn't follow at 37 weeks. I did cervadil for 12 hours and then moved over to pit. After three and a half days of no sleep & severe cramping/vomiting from my Crohns I ended up getting an epidural (moved from 4cm to 10cm in less than 3 hours while I napped after it was put in - just long enough for all of my medicine in the machine to get used!).
Talk to your OB and ask what they will do if your child stays on a normal growth pattern. I was told I could go to 41 weeks and then they'd induce given how easily my GD was controlled.
As a bonus - my OB signed off for me to eat/drink during labor to keep my sugars in check. It was heavenly to be able to eat real food!
Socializing foster puppies since 2009
Chart for TTC#2
I had GD, and I was on insulin 5x/day towards the end. When I was fist diagnosed, I panicked - because I thought all of my planning for a natural birth was out of the window. I was so upset!
Luckily, I was with a midwife that worked within an OB practice. The OBs wanted to push me for induction at 39 weeks, but after speaking with the extremely knowledgeable endocrinologist who handled my GD, I realized it wasn't necessary. The MWs were perfectly comfortable with me going to 41 weeks if necessary. It didn't wind up being necessary, as the MW stripped my membranes and that put me into labor. I had a natural birth with absolutely no intervention - no IV catheter, nothing. It was wonderful.
GD doesn't = high intervention birth. You need to be with a practice that you trust and with people that respect your decisions. You also need to make sure that they can CLEARLY explain WHY an induction is necessary and back it up with literature.
Good luck. It can be done!
With my last GD pregnancy, I went into labor on my own at 39w1d, and delivered DD with no pain meds. The only intervention we had was my OB broke my water to move things a little faster. (I had two days of mild, but regular contractions, got to 4cm, broke my water, and had a baby an hour and a half later.)
This time, the induction subject has already come up. My blood sugars are much more difficult to control, so if baby doesn't make her appearance by 39 weeks, we will most likely be inducing.
I dont know much about GD - but I can swear that I came across literature or a video where Dr. Marsden Wagner (it may not even have been him, but it was some authority on childbirth) said that GD was actually totally normal response to pregnancy and doesnt need to be treated like this big thing that causes all these interventions. It sounded like GD was "invented" by the medical industry - I wish I rembered the source but perhaps you could google for it?
ETA - FOUND IT!!
In Marsden Wagner's book Born in the USA: . . .
Obstetric Practices That Should Not Be Done:
"Screening for 'Gestational Diabetes,'" the authors put gestational diabetes in quotation marks because there's no such thing as gestational diabetes. It is an invention of obstetricians that describes an elevated glucose level in the blood, a level that is normal in pregnancy and without complications.
Also check this article:
https://www.drmomma.org/2010/06/gestational-diabetes-emperor-has-no.html