This is something my ped said when DS was 1 week old. He said some babies won't cry when they are hungry and will just be calm and passive but secretely starving. This has played with my head ever since. It seems like hogwash to me. I can't imagine any living creature just happily starving... and eating is such a urgent drive for babies. Has anyone ever actually seen a case if this?
Re: "Happy to starve"?
MY JOURNEY AS A SINGLE BF-ING, CD-ING, BABYWEARING MOM
I think "starve" is a bit strong, but my DD was one who was always pretty content and never an "on demand" BF'er. She was slow to gain weight, even when she was 4 months old, and I found I really needed to offer to BF her every 2 hours rather than wait for hungry cues.
I think it is important to remember that "don't offer, don't refuse" is weaning advice. It is great to BF babies on demand, but it also never hurts to offer whenever you feel like it.
My baby is a very content little guy, who does not really cry for much of anything. I agree that having a laid back baby can be a bit of a guessing game. I just decided that I would offer at least every 2 to 3 hours in the beginning. I was super careful that he always had an adequate diaper count. As he has gotten older, I will let him sleep a little longer during the day, but if he's awake I offer like clockwork even if he's not giving much in terms of hunger cues. Most of the time, he is happy to nurse when I offer. When he's not interested, he will suck a few times and then turn away. I am still counting diapers as well. His weight gain has been completely fine. He was born 5 weeks early at 5 lbs 12 onces, and I think he's around 13-14 lbs now. I don't really think there's anything wrong with his ability to feel hunger, or anything pathological that requires treatment. I think this is a matter of temperment, and that he just needs me to take the lead on things a little bit. When he goes to daycare, I will tell them to feed him every 3 hours, unless he's giving hunger cues. I don't expect to have a problem. I think they might think I'm a little obsessed with diaper output, though!
There's a section about laid back babies in The Womanly Art of Breastfeeding,
This is all very well said, but the bold part is SO true. DD2 was born early (35w) and I had to wake her up every 1.5-2hrs to force her to eat. She would have slept until she shriveled up into nothing had I not woken her up. She had jaundice issues that lasted longer than most due to being preterm. One of the hardest parts of BFing her was making her wake up. Even if I got her awake long enough to latch, a few sucks into it and she was back asleep. I had to constantly do things to keep her awake so she'd keep eating. So yes, they definitely will sleep instead of eat and then get dehydrated very, very quickly.